jpwilly
Member
Nice looking build. Bit rich for my wallet but very appealing rifle.
Just from looking at it, I would have to say that it is a DSG Arms with a 1 in 9 twist...the contour I don't know (HBAR?).longdayjake, what's the contour and rate of twist on that barrel (and where'd you get it)?
longdayjake, what's the contour and rate of twist on that barrel (and where'd you get it)?
That's where my mind was wandering. 6.5 Grendel seems ideal for our North Carolina deer, must be OK for those behemoths that grow in Idaho, too.It is going on my deer hunt this year.
Just givin' you a hard time...and it was DSC (Double Star Corp.) so I was wrong...but there is a company called DSG that sells AR parts IIRC.So, I "axed".
Laupa 6.5 Grendel brass is really expensive, but I was able to pick up 500 rounds of brand new IMI 7.62x39 brass pretty cheap and it's easy to fireform. I think the 6.8 and the 6.5 are relatively close up to 100 yards (the target's not going to be able to tell the difference), but the 6.5 just gets better and better as the distance increases compared to other cartridges. I think my next build will be a 12.5" SBR in 6.5 Grendel. As soon as I finish paying off my first one that is.Just givin' you a hard time...and it was DSC (Double Star Corp.) so I was wrong...but there is a company called DSG that sells AR parts IIRC.
As far as the choice between 6.8 and 6.5...the Grendel wins out in every way from my point of view. Components are hard to get, but brass can be formed from cheap, readily available 7.62x39mm (so I have been told by some more experienced reloaders) making it very economical for the handloader. The ballistics also blow the 6.8SPC out of the water, approaching the ballistics of the venerable .260Rem.
Never done it before, but IIRC all you need to do is run it through a 6.5G sizing die then load it (with less than normal powder), chamber and fire it. This is known as fire forming and it blows out the case to 6.5G specs. I believe that you do the same for 6mmPPC, but again I have never done it and am just getting started with handloading.To reform 7.62x39 brass, you'd have to turn the neck, right?
I got the IMI brass off Gunbroker. It appears to be very good quality, but does use a large primer however.If you don't mind me asking, where did you get the IMI brass and what did the 500 run you? Also, they use the large primers right?
I've looked at Lapua and AA brass on a few sites and ended up just ordering it direct from AA. It's about the best price and it's manufactured by Lapua anyway.
Out of the 30 Wolf I've ran between both of my Grendels I don't even want to bother with that brass since I've blown 1 primer and a couple of others are starting to go after 1 shot. I figured I'd probably just stick to the Lapua brass with small primers, but I'd consider the IMI brass at least to test a few loads in.
I haven't turned any of the cases I've resized and they have worked fine. While all the IMI brass resized without a hitch, I also had around 90 cases of mixed Remington, PMC and Winchester and I crushed about 20 of them in the resizing process.Maverick, no worries!
To reform 7.62x39 brass, you'd have to turn the neck, right?
What about up sizing 6mm PPC? Or is that brass just too expensive?
The way Bob at Templar described it to me the piston rod induces flex between the barrel and receiver. Probably not an issue for a CQB gun, but not conducive to maximum accuracy when shooting at extreme distances.Simply beautiful.... nice job!
Mav... I have been tossing that very idea around, a piston 6.5G.
I am a fan of the Grendel!
Why do you suppose you are going to loose accuracy with the piston upper?
I too am a fan of the 6.5G...very good ballistics in a small OAL. I have never been a fan of DI, so it will be a piston for me.Mav... I have been tossing that very idea around, a piston 6.5G...I am a fan of the Grendel!
+1, the op. rod moves to the rear prior to the exit of the projectile resulting in a slight loss of accuracy. I am willing to part with 1/10 of a MOA to keep the rifle clean and functioning without gallons of lube cooking on the carrier.The way Bob at Templar described it to me the piston rod induces flex between the barrel and receiver. Probably not an issue for a CQB gun, but not conducive to maximum accuracy when shooting at extreme distances.
To reform 7.62x39 brass, you'd have to turn the neck, right?
I haven't turned any of the cases I've resized and they have worked fine. While all the IMI brass resized without a hitch, I also had around 90 cases of mixed Remington, PMC and Winchester and I crushed about 20 of them in the resizing process.
Yes, possibly even in the ever-accurate AK-47 , however I do not think in makes a big difference in the grand scheme of things. For me it is a worthwhile upgrade. IMO if you are that concerned with the ultimate in accuracy then the only rifles to consider are select single shots and bolt actions.Do you rekkin that op rod receiver barrel 'flex' is evident in...say a M1A or Garand?