Well,
At least I got a reply from one of 'em. Mikulski, must be too short to read my letter or something.
Here's what he said...
Dear Mr. XXXXXX,
Thank you for contacting my office to express your concerns about S. 1431, the Law Enforcement Protection Act of 2003. I appreciate having the benefit of your views on this important issue.
As you may know, S. 1431 extends the assault weapons ban established by the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, which was signed into law on September 13, 1994. This legislation forbids the manufacture, sale, or possession of nineteen assault-style weapons typically used in criminal activity. The assault weapons ban established by the 1994 crime bill is set to expire next year. S. 1431 is intended to extend the assault weapons ban, as well as include several other types of assault weapons, that are not covered by the ban.
You should know it is my belief that assault weapons are more suitable for harming people than hunting or target shooting and are used by criminals to commit violent crimes against police officers and ordinary citizens. Therefore, I must tell you frankly that I am a co-sponsor of S. 1431. Since its introduction in the United States Senate on July 17, 2003, S. 1431 has been referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee. While i do not serve on this committee, you can be sure that I will keep your views in mind I should S.1431 come before the full Senate for debate.
While we may not fully agree on these issues, you may be sure that I will continue to consider the interests of hunters, target shooters, and people who use firearms for authorized security purposes as the Senate considers this legislation. Again, thank you for taking the time to express your thoughts to me on this issue. Please do not hesitate to contact me in the future about this or other matters that may be of concern to you.
With best regards,
Sincerely,
Paul Sarbanes
United States Senator
Now,
Should I reply? Do I even bring up his "I believe assault weapons are more suitable..." is full of crap? How about how his "I believe..." is irrelevant? What his consituents believe is what's relevant, and judging by the fact that a "underdog" Republican handed an incumbent Kennedy her ass (one of the main reasons is over gun control) in the gubernatorial race should matter to him. How 'bout the fact that it's obviously a form letter from 2003 (almost identical ot the one he sent me a year ago)? How bout the fact that most police departments, including the MD state police (his home state) think that the AWB is a useless POS? Or that by supporting the AWB that he's NOT considering the "hunters, target shooters...." that he claims to love so? Not to mention *** does he mean in the last sentence of the second to last paragraph?! Do I even bother?
R
At least I got a reply from one of 'em. Mikulski, must be too short to read my letter or something.
Here's what he said...
Dear Mr. XXXXXX,
Thank you for contacting my office to express your concerns about S. 1431, the Law Enforcement Protection Act of 2003. I appreciate having the benefit of your views on this important issue.
As you may know, S. 1431 extends the assault weapons ban established by the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, which was signed into law on September 13, 1994. This legislation forbids the manufacture, sale, or possession of nineteen assault-style weapons typically used in criminal activity. The assault weapons ban established by the 1994 crime bill is set to expire next year. S. 1431 is intended to extend the assault weapons ban, as well as include several other types of assault weapons, that are not covered by the ban.
You should know it is my belief that assault weapons are more suitable for harming people than hunting or target shooting and are used by criminals to commit violent crimes against police officers and ordinary citizens. Therefore, I must tell you frankly that I am a co-sponsor of S. 1431. Since its introduction in the United States Senate on July 17, 2003, S. 1431 has been referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee. While i do not serve on this committee, you can be sure that I will keep your views in mind I should S.1431 come before the full Senate for debate.
While we may not fully agree on these issues, you may be sure that I will continue to consider the interests of hunters, target shooters, and people who use firearms for authorized security purposes as the Senate considers this legislation. Again, thank you for taking the time to express your thoughts to me on this issue. Please do not hesitate to contact me in the future about this or other matters that may be of concern to you.
With best regards,
Sincerely,
Paul Sarbanes
United States Senator
Now,
Should I reply? Do I even bring up his "I believe assault weapons are more suitable..." is full of crap? How about how his "I believe..." is irrelevant? What his consituents believe is what's relevant, and judging by the fact that a "underdog" Republican handed an incumbent Kennedy her ass (one of the main reasons is over gun control) in the gubernatorial race should matter to him. How 'bout the fact that it's obviously a form letter from 2003 (almost identical ot the one he sent me a year ago)? How bout the fact that most police departments, including the MD state police (his home state) think that the AWB is a useless POS? Or that by supporting the AWB that he's NOT considering the "hunters, target shooters...." that he claims to love so? Not to mention *** does he mean in the last sentence of the second to last paragraph?! Do I even bother?
R