SunnySlopes
Member
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2011
- Messages
- 1,233
Believe it or not, most gun makers are small-cap companies at best. I can only think of 1 off hand that has revenues of over 1billion and that is Ruger. They are not "big business" the way anti's suggest. I believe that Smith and Wesson is a $600 Million per year company... Peanuts.
Sort of. The fact is that in America, only Smith and Wesson and Ruger are publically traded, so it's really impossible to know what's going on with, say, Jennings or Bryco. Winchester is publically traded but apparantly it's wrapped up in other non-gun items w/Olin, Inc. I don't have the time or inclination to research their gun division separate from the rest.
For 2010, Smith and Wesson had $406 million in sales with an adjusted net income of $32 million. That compares with an adjusted net from 2009 of minus $64 million. 2008: an adjusted net income of $9 million.
Their future looks bad. They had a spike in sales because of Obama, but that's cooled off. Their only hope is that he gets re-elected cause that fuels gun purchases.
Looking at profitability, liquidiity and investor ratios of S&W compared to Ruger, Ruger is in much better shape. Still, Ruger's figures as a corporation aren't such as to necessarily attract the attention of multinational investment conglomerates.
I honestly wonder why anybody would be in the gun business, from an investment point of view.