Kramer Krazy
Member
I've got two Norinco MAK-90s, both in 7.62x39, and one with a stamped reciever and one with the forged reciever. I bought both of mine in 1993 or early 1994 for only $199 each. They are pretty well made, fun to shoot, ammo is fairly cheap, and I don't have any functional problems with them. Accuracy at 100 yrds is a joke. My old 1944 M1 carbine can outshoot both of them. To add to the AK vs. AR and ammo issue, I also have a Colt AR-15A2 and a Bushmaster CAR-15A2. As a comparison to 7.62x39 and .223, I used to have some home-made steel targets made of 1/2" cold-rolled steel. The 7.62 made a bigger surface area hit, but the pentration was only about halfway through the plates. The .223 looked like I'd taken a drill press to them. The holes were perfectly made, had about 7/8 penetration, and the back of the steel had big dimples where the bullet tried going through it. Overall, I'd rather shoot the ARs for accuracy, less amount of recoil, and they are just a whole lot of fun. 
