westernrover
Member
- Joined
- May 4, 2018
- Messages
- 1,613
For me, it means "too bling"Too nice? That has never made sense to me.
To date, I've only ever owned firearms for which I've had a practical use (protection, hunting, etc.). My firearms haven't been cheap, but they haven't been ornate either. More recently, I've considered buying firearms as a store-of-value. Speculating is too risky for me, so I'd only be looking for guns that would keep their value against inflation, not trying to win a jackpot. Besides, even if they did go way up in value, I'd rather have the guns or gold than cash anyway.
Colt seems to be keeping up with demand for their new revolvers and I see retail prices dropping as well as an increase in available used examples at lower prices. Buying a Colt new would surely result in some depreciation. A used stainless Python could probably be expected to hold some value, but I suspect they're not done depreciating yet.
One of the questions I have is whether a lot of guns aren't like silver coins. If a person were to put much savings into them, they would find that they can quickly create a storage problem. As long as I'm not beating them up like some kind of "truck gun," I wonder if it doesn't make sense to buy more valuable guns. On the other hand, I suspect a lot of "value-add" propositions like engraving and inlay and elaborate decorations can make it harder to find a buyer for a gun. The "numismatic" value of rare, "original" items of collector interest is probably a safer investment, but a finnicky one and might mean that I'd have to leave the gun "unfired" to maintain its maximum value -- and who the hell would want to do that?