New to me…Browning MKIII hard Chrome / Target sights

whatnickname

Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2008
Messages
1,004
Location
Oklahoma
Found this one on-line and couldn’t resist. ‘95 vintage MKIII in mint condition. It came with after market walnut grips that included finger groves on the front strap…not particularly fond of these type grips so I replaced them with some G10 grips. Browning isn’t making any more of these. Magazine safety is still in place but the trigger breaks very crisply at just a tad over 5.25 pounds.




6E1628F4-7CDE-4FA7-81A9-E652BD40F0C8.jpeg
 
Nice find. Don't see many hard chrome HP's. Hope it shoots as good as it looks. Love the grips, g10 has become my go-to for HP grips. Have them on all 4 of mine.
Thanks. The pistol shoots 2”ish groups at 25 yards. G10 grips are nearly indestructible. I thought the black & grey would look nice on the pistol. I’m going to carry this pistol and it always seems like the butt it getting dinged when I get in or out of the truck.
 
whatnickname
Magazine safety is still in place but the trigger breaks very crisply at just a tad over 5.25 pounds.

That's what I found on my Hi-Power Mk.II when I first got it. Even with the mag safety still in place, the trigger was clean and crisp at 5.4 lbs. Much better than a lot of older Hi-Powers that I had tried. Like the hard chrome finish too.
52xA8NW.jpg
 
Very nice! Your 5.25# trigger is lighter than any stock Hi Power I've owned, except the GP and SA-35. My stock HPs have been more like 8#. That hard chrome finish is a favorite of mine. I had a couple hard chromed, and had the factory Practical model with hard chrome frame. Hard chrome and DLC are the hardest, toughest, finishes I've encountered. They are easy to clean too; so hard nothing wants to stick to them..
Practical-m.JPG
 
The hard chrome is nice, and if I were to carry one, Id definitely consider having it done. My MKIII's finish was more of a park "wash", and was wearing off just by handling and shooting it. I gave it a proper park job not long after I got it, and its held up well. I took the mag safety out because I wanted the mags to drop free. The trigger was fine, before and after, although I don't know what its weight actually is. Really like this version of the HP, but hate the ambi safety. Keep threatening to replace it, but at this point, Im not going tobother.

00-DboCy8WJYzQR_q_dc-F5BNyntOLdWDP5ZdA7LI-ODz80kKmkJl5kbjuT8lw_Ie1bUnDnu4gHHWpfyYq5WwzmNg



Picked this one up a couple of years back. Was in good shape, but I found out that somebody "improved" its trigger the first time I shot it as it put the first round I dropped the slide on into the ground about 6' in front of me. Thought hmmm, that's weird, but of course, I went right ahead and pulled the trigger again, and got a 4 or 5 round "burst" out of it that time. That was it for that range outing. Ended up putting a factory sear and sear spring in the gun and its been fine ever since. Took the mag safety out of it too, and and for the same reason, and its trigger feels about the same as the other one.

00-DboCy8WJYzQR_q_dc-F5BNyntOLdWDP5ZdA7LI-ODz9qQrtje1UisCQMISQcsIq3rnHjCyIZu59oV2we_kMG9A
 
The hard chrome is nice, and if I were to carry one, Id definitely consider having it done. My MKIII's finish was more of a park "wash", and was wearing off just by handling and shooting it. I gave it a proper park job not long after I got it, and its held up well. I took the mag safety out because I wanted the mags to drop free. The trigger was fine, before and after, although I don't know what its weight actually is. Really like this version of the HP, but hate the ambi safety. Keep threatening to replace it, but at this point, Im not going tobother.

00-DboCy8WJYzQR_q_dc-F5BNyntOLdWDP5ZdA7LI-ODz80kKmkJl5kbjuT8lw_Ie1bUnDnu4gHHWpfyYq5WwzmNg



Picked this one up a couple of years back. Was in good shape, but I found out that somebody "improved" its trigger the first time I shot it as it put the first round I dropped the slide on into the ground about 6' in front of me. Thought hmmm, that's weird, but of course, I went right ahead and pulled the trigger again, and got a 4 or 5 round "burst" out of it that time. That was it for that range outing. Ended up putting a factory sear and sear spring in the gun and its been fine ever since. Took the mag safety out of it too, and and for the same reason, and its trigger feels about the same as the other one.

00-DboCy8WJYzQR_q_dc-F5BNyntOLdWDP5ZdA7LI-ODz9qQrtje1UisCQMISQcsIq3rnHjCyIZu59oV2we_kMG9A
That park job looks great. I picked up a mkiii last year that someone mag-na- ported and did other things to it. Somehow got the trigger down to around 3 pounds. Not sure how. Once I got it to the range found out it was unsafe to shoot. Bad hammer follow and slam fires. Kinda like yours. It's at mk3 custom out in Vegas. Can't wait to get it back.
 
whatnickname


That's what I found on my Hi-Power Mk.II when I first got it. Even with the mag safety still in place, the trigger was clean and crisp at 5.4 lbs. Much better than a lot of older Hi-Powers that I had tried. Like the hard chrome finish too.
52xA8NW.jpg

I agree completely. I’ve got an 87 vintage HP with every bit of a 7+ pound trigger pull.
 
The hard chrome is nice, and if I were to carry one, Id definitely consider having it done. My MKIII's finish was more of a park "wash", and was wearing off just by handling and shooting it. I gave it a proper park job not long after I got it, and its held up well. I took the mag safety out because I wanted the mags to drop free. The trigger was fine, before and after, although I don't know what its weight actually is. Really like this version of the HP, but hate the ambi safety. Keep threatening to replace it, but at this point, Im not going tobother.

00-DboCy8WJYzQR_q_dc-F5BNyntOLdWDP5ZdA7LI-ODz80kKmkJl5kbjuT8lw_Ie1bUnDnu4gHHWpfyYq5WwzmNg



Picked this one up a couple of years back. Was in good shape, but I found out that somebody "improved" its trigger the first time I shot it as it put the first round I dropped the slide on into the ground about 6' in front of me. Thought hmmm, that's weird, but of course, I went right ahead and pulled the trigger again, and got a 4 or 5 round "burst" out of it that time. That was it for that range outing. Ended up putting a factory sear and sear spring in the gun and its been fine ever since. Took the mag safety out of it too, and and for the same reason, and its trigger feels about the same as the other one.

00-DboCy8WJYzQR_q_dc-F5BNyntOLdWDP5ZdA7LI-ODz9qQrtje1UisCQMISQcsIq3rnHjCyIZu59oV2we_kMG9A

Sounds like “bubba” really did a D-Lux trigger job on the second gun. What really pisses me off about stuff like that is that rather than doing the right thing “bubba” just traded it away and was perfectly okay with putting lives in jeopardy with an unsafe pistol. Glad you didn’t get hurt.
 
Yea, I told the dealer who sold it to me about it and to kick that person in the ass for me the next time he saw them. It wasn't the dealers fault, but the gun was dangerous.
 
Found this one on-line and couldn’t resist. ‘95 vintage MKIII in mint condition. It came with after market walnut grips that included finger groves on the front strap…not particularly fond of these type grips so I replaced them with some G10 grips. Browning isn’t making any more of these. Magazine safety is still in place but the trigger breaks very crisply at just a tad over 5.25 pounds.




View attachment 1201172
Nice, nice pistol. It was the top of the HP35 in the nineties and first decade of the 2000. The gold plated trigger is there to indicate it was the top. These pistols were also marketed in Italy as "Browning". There were a two tone model with fixed sights and this one. I can't remember how they call them as variants but I can find the information. Maybe Combat and Target.
Were yours is it made? Some HP35 of that era were made in Portugal instead of Belgium.

Edit: maybe assembled in Portugal but still made in Belgium.
The original grips were rubber Pachmayr with a rubber band around the front strap.
 
Last edited:
Found this one on-line and couldn’t resist. ‘95 vintage MKIII in mint condition. It came with after market walnut grips that included finger groves on the front strap…not particularly fond of these type grips so I replaced them with some G10 grips. Browning isn’t making any more of these. Magazine safety is still in place but the trigger breaks very crisply at just a tad over 5.25 pounds.
I have a '95 MkIII that looks just like that, same sights and gold trigger. Mine is .40S&W, though. It came with wrap-around Pachmayrs that had the Browning logo button, but I put a set of Hogue cocobolo grips on it, looks and feels much better. Browning called that model "Silver Chrome". Have you left the magazine disconnect in it? I removed mine and the trigger improved, hardly any creep, just a short take-up like a 2-stage rifle trigger. Once the disconnect is gone, you don't need the mousetrap style magazines to make the magazine eject. Without the disconnect, the mousetrap spring really launches the mag when it is released. Regular Mec-gar magazines will work fine.
IMG_1379.jpg IMG_2449.jpg

 
A lot of nice blasters in here! I have an FM (Argentine surplus) and a much more recent MkIII. Both wound up with C&S hammer/safety/sear, mag safety delete, thin Micarta grips, and better sights (Novak on the FM and factory night sights on the MkIII). I don't shoot them too often but always enjoy it when I do :D
 
We had a number of the FM's in the past, and my kids each got one as their first handgun. They were well made and in some cases, I thought they were a bit beefier and better made than the Brownings. Their paint over park finish was a bit rought/crude, but it was robust, especially compared to the Brownings of the same period.

One weird thing with them was, that their mags would not fit in my Browning and Inglis HP's, but they would take any of the others HP's mags without issue or problem. Just had to make sure to segregate their mags from the rest.
 
I removed the magazine safety on both of my Brownings....one a standard in .40 S&W and the other is a "Practical", two-tone in 9mm. That small change made a considerable difference in the triggers on both...for the better. Without a trigger pull gauge, I'd estimate they're just south of 5 lbs.

As for features: I'm not overly fond of the high riding sights on the .40 Standard but it functions fine. Nor am I a fan of the ambidextrous safety on the Practical as it has a tendency to flip off while riding on my right hip. Too the fixed sights on the 'Practical' are regulated a bit low for my taste and it came with a set of Pachmayr rubbers grips that are entirely too bulky. The Hogues fixed that.

My Springfield SA-35, however came in with a trigger that feels 1/2 lb. lighter...and was not equipped with a mag 'safety'. The Springfield is a better pistol, better accuracy, better sights, no mag safety and with good usable factory grips....it's better IMHO than any BHP I've owned or shot.

Best Regards Rod Pic below of the 9mm 'Practical' with a replacement set of Hogues on it.

 
Last edited:
My Practical is a 40S&W. I've had a love/hate relationship with my BHP. The trigger sucks is subpar and I cannot stop the hammer bite. Even the C&S hammer didn't fix it. The best results my shadetree gunsmithing; I bobbed my own hammer spur...still not perfect, but it'll do.

BHP 231201 008.jpg
 
Back
Top