New (to Me) Marlin 1894C

Status
Not open for further replies.

Legionnaire

Contributing Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
8,637
Location
Texas
Unfortunately, time ran out this weekend before I was able to get to the range. However, I did have some fun with a new-to-me 1894C. Had an older, pre-crossbolt-safety specimen a few years ago and foolishly sold it. Once I got into reloading, I immediately missed that 1894, since I really enjoy reloading for my .357 revolvers.

Anyway, got the "new" gun second hand from a guy on another forum. When I picked it up at the dealer, it looked barely fired. It's a late model with Ballard-style rifling, crossbolt safety, and utilitarian wood.

Broke it down Saturday and minimal internal wear suggests the seller was accurate in his description of less than 50 rounds fired. Key giveaway was that the leading edge of the cam on the lever was still razor sharp, but there was only the slightest notch in the mating surface on the carrier. First order of business was to radius the front of the cam to keep it from further wearing the carrier, thus (hopefully) preventing the infamous "Marlin jam."

Second order of business was getting rid of that stupid crossbolt safety. Replaced it with a kit from Long Hunter Shooting Supply. Third, swapped out the stock trigger with a Wild West Guns "happy trigger" kit; dropped in nicely, thank you. And finally, after detail cleaning and reassembling, added the XS ghost-ring sight set that I at least had the foresight to pull from my previous 1894 before selling it.

Once it was all reassembled, cycled several different types of ammo through it without a hitch. I was especially pleased that my handloaded 158 grain Missouri Bullet LSWCs seemed to load and cycle well.

So now, can't wait for a free afternoon to get to the range, sight it in, and see what it will do. When I have enough time, I'll also chronograph some of my hand loads to see what kind of velocities I'm getting compared to my revolvers.

Range report and pics to follow ... not necessarily in that order.
 
Last edited:
Wife and I both love ours chambered in 357. I like it because it's accurate, relatively quiet, and a great HD rifle. She likes it because it reminds her of the old "Rifleman" tv series... whatever. :rolleyes:
 
I got one new last Christmas and just took it to the range last Saturday. It held a 4" group at 50 yds and a 7" group at 100 with iron sights with 10 shot groups. Goin back soon as I clean her up. Interested in the Happy trigger Legionnaire (maybe that and a peep will do wonders).
 
Couple of pics ...

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • 1894c01.jpg
    1894c01.jpg
    121 KB · Views: 280
My first rifle was a BL-22 Browning...so I have been a long-time lever fan.
I like my 1894, and it is a great companion for my .357 revolvers.
I wish Illinois would make short range, straight wall calibers legal for deer hunting like Indiana has done.
 
you seem handy and may have already done this or decided not to, but I find that if I take a little off the hammer spring and bend the ejector spring a little so that it takes some tension off the bolt, pop out the pin that holds the plunger that holds the lever closed and take some off that spring and you will have a whole new gun. a better gun.
 
Thanks for the tips, greyling. Conceptually, I understand what the first two do. The last helps loosen the lever?
 
yeah, it takes less effort to break the lever free of the gun, and to fully seat it back again. there are a couple springs in by the trigger that can be bent as well, but I don't know if they're still there after installing a new trigger.

http://marauder.homestead.com/files/tuning_m_1894.htm
http://www.gunfighter.com/cgi-bin/bbs/cowboy-a/cowboy-a.cgi?read=39871

are a couple of good resources on slicking up a marlin. I don't do everything in there, but I did some. it helped turn a few good guns into great guns with so little effort it amazes me that marlin doesn't spend an extra half hour to get their guns right and charge an extra 50 bucks. heck, they could just put in springs with the correct tension for an extra 0 dollars and have a better gun. lawyers I guess. or just manufacturing laziness.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top