NJIT's smart gun moves closer to completion with $1.1 million grant

Status
Not open for further replies.

Harry Tuttle

Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2003
Messages
3,093
Public release date: 4-Nov-2004
attachment.php

Contact: Sheryl Weinstein
[email protected]
973-596-3436
New Jersey Institute of Technology
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2004-11/njio-nsg110404.php

NJIT's smart gun moves closer to completion with $1.1 million grant


Scientists at New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT) were awarded $1.1 million by the US Department of Justice to continue testing a safer personalized weapon.

"We're still on target with a delivery date of January, 2006, for a commercial-ready prototype of a smart gun," said Donald H. Sebastian, PhD, vice president for research and development at NJIT and professor of mechanical engineering. "This new money allows us to keep field tests and evaluations running smoothly with researchers at the U.S. Army Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center (ARDEC), in Picatinny." The gun has been in testing at Picatinny for almost a year now.

(Editor's Note: Reporters may schedule a time to observe the firing of a prototype weapon by calling Sheryl Weinstein, 973-596-3436.)

Since 2000, NJIT has spearheaded efforts to develop a personalized handgun that can recognize, instantly and reliably, one or more pre-programmed authorized users. To date, the New Jersey legislature has awarded NJIT $1.5 million for the project.

In December of 2002, New Jersey became the first state to pass legislation specifying that three years after it is determined that personalized handguns are available for retail sale, dealers and manufacturers will not be able to sell, assign or transfer any handgun legally unless it is personalized. Last January, U.S. Senator Frank R. Lautenberg and U.S. Senator Jon S.Corzine hosted a media conference at NJIT to highlight the project.

The attention capped a year of developments. Six months earlier (May, 2003) Michael Recce, PhD, associate professor of information systems at NJIT, received a patent for inventing Dynamic Grip Recognition. This behavioral biometric has enabled Timothy Chang, PhD, professor of electrical engineering at NJIT, assisted by a team of engineers, to embed multiple small electronic sensors in both sides of the gun's grip. The sensors identify the user. The finished gun will eventually feature both electronic features and computerized parts. Recce sees his invention someday also being used in other applications--perhaps the yoke of a plane or the steering wheel of a car.

Then, last fall, NJIT also signed an agreement with the Australian-based research and development company Metal Storm Ltd. Metal Storm owns a patent for its Electronic Firing System which can be used in a handgun. Metal Storm's O'DwyerTM VLe® system is a unique, patented approach to firing projectiles. Entirely electronic, the system utilizes preloaded barrels holding multiple projectiles that are fired by electronic ignition. For the first time, interchangeable and multiple barrels can be made available to fire a range of projectiles of varying caliber from the same handgun.

"We're grateful for the money," said Sebastian. "We're looking forward to seeing the project near completion."
 

Attachments

  • njit110404.1.jpg
    njit110404.1.jpg
    22.9 KB · Views: 656
The answer to a question not asked by this nation's gunowners

What to do if the battery(ies) fail during a self-defense encounter?

What if the user is wearing gloves when they find themselves needing to present the weapon?

What if the (possibly delicate) sensors fail due to excessive wear?

Then what?

What sort of warranty coverage will the manufacture extend to legislatively-required add-ons?

Will there be a (noxious) exception to "smart" gun legislation whereby law enforcement personnel are exempt from using such products?

There's a plethora of problematic issues with NJIT's endeavor here. I'm sure I've only touched on a few.

TM

Holding on to his dumb guns.
 
Will there be a (noxious) exception to "smart" gun legislation whereby law enforcement personnel are exempt from using such products?

Of course. I might be in favor of the law if it was mandated that the police must use the technology before it was deemed safe for the population :evil: . I would forsee a quick death to this silliness then ;) .
 
The height of stupidity. Just the scum fleecing taxpayers.. And when
it causes problems, it gives the antis another reason to ban.Ed.
 
Scientists at New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT) were awarded $1.1 million by the US Department of Justice to continue testing a safer personalized weapon.


The Bush Administration needs to pull their head out and stop funding this crap.
 
Will there be a (noxious) exception to "smart" gun legislation whereby law enforcement personnel are exempt from using such products?
Already in place in PRNJ. :cuss:

The Bush administration should mandate "smart" guns as duty weapons for police in all states in which they are mandated for proles, as a condition for getting further handouts from Uncle Fedgov.

- pdmoderator
 
The irony is this law was first proposed for duty weapons so if they were taken away from the LEO his gun couldn't be used against him. After the legislature had proposed this law the LEO's in the state told the lawmakers where they could stick it because they would never use one of these guns. So what do the lawmakers do? Reword it so now it applies to civilians.
 
Things that could go wrong (to name a few) with this thing when you're trying to defend your life or your family:
(1) the wiring could fail
(2) the sensor could fail
(3) the battery may die
(4) the computer chip could malfunction
(5) you may have to grip it with your other hand, in case of injury
(6) you may have to grip it differently, in case of injury
(7) you may have a broken or swollen finger, in case of injury
(8) you may have to hand it your wife, in case you are incapacitated somehow...

....WHAT THEN???

If they are going to impose this on us, then they should first impose these on the police force!!! Let's see if they'd have any takers then!!!
 
Umm. We do own the House, Senate, and Presidency. Maybe, just maybe this can be turned around.

Call your congress critters. I just helped re-elect one of mine.
 
Not going to happen with Corzine and Lautenberg as our Senators and Cody to become our Gov. come Nov. 15. Don't get me wrong I'm not a defeatist, but living in NJ all my life I've grown to become a rabid pessimist!!
 
Lautenburg is the ??????? that proposed this bill.

Other things that can go wrong:

Your hand is covered in blood.
You just stepped out of the shower/washed dishes and your hand is pruned up.
You are wearing gloves.
The intruder is between your gun and you and only your family member can reach your gun.
The gun gets dropped in water.
Cleaning solvents cause a failure.
In a state of panic you enter wrong PIN.
Gun is dropped causing a malfunction.
 
(Editor's Note: Reporters may schedule a time to observe the firing of a prototype weapon by calling Sheryl Weinstein, 973-596-3436.)
Now that would make an excellent story. Anyone know how to pass this along to the editors of American Rifleman and American Rifleman TV?

I'd love to see 'em try to demo the thing for people who know how to test guns. :D

- pdmoderator
 
Have you read the research, or are we just guessing that none of these issues are not being addressed?

Jerking one's knee too much could lead to joint damage.

I imagine that when percussion caps were introduced the flint guys thought they'd never work.
 
Holy crap, I agree with Sendec......who would've known? :neener:



Researching this isn't inherently a bad thing; it's just research. These things are light years away from being a reality.

I'm not happy about it either, but I'm certainly not too worried about it.
 
sendec said:
Have you read the research, or are we just guessing that none of these issues are not being addressed?

Jerking one's knee too much could lead to joint damage.

I imagine that when percussion caps were introduced the flint guys thought they'd never work.

I have no problem with smart guns, and would love to see a viable one be marketed. However, there is no way in hell that they should be mandated for those that do not want them. I can only imagine the cost of one of these things. :what:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top