priv8ter
Member
I was at this gun range in Connecticut the other day, and while reading their rules and signing their waiver forms, I saw that one of their rules was no rapid fire.
Now, the ranges I shoot at in Washington have that rule also, and what they don't want to here is someone emptying a magazine into the sealing because they can't control the recoil. But, double-taps are fine. Being my first(and only time) at this range though, I decided to seek clarification.
Me: Hey, this says no rapid fire, but are double-taps okay?
Man behind the counter, already leary of my Washington State Concealed Carry Permit, and lack of a Connecticut Pistol License:
Does that mean you intened to pull the trigger more than once per second?
Me: Ummm....yes.
Man behind counter: That sounds like rapid fire to me.
Dude's attitude made me feel about two inches tall. But, his place, his rules. That, and the nearest other range that would rent to me was the Smith and Wesson range in Springfield, Mass, over an hour away.
I'll admit to not being sure of the 'tactical' validity of double-taps, but I know during my normal training sessions, I practice at least a couple of magazines that are nothing but double-taps, and if I ever find myself needing to use my gun in a defensive situation, well...double-taps is what I have been practicing.
Am I blowing this whole double-tap thing out of proportion in my attempts to be deffensively minded? I have always kind of wondered how that would come out in a trial:
Evil Lawyer looking to prosecute me for defending mine and my families life: So according to all the data, you pulled the trigger twice? How do you know the first bullet wouldn't have stopped the threat?
Just looking to get other folks thoughts on double-taps, and if anyone nows of a double-tap ever being used against someone in a court of law
Now, the ranges I shoot at in Washington have that rule also, and what they don't want to here is someone emptying a magazine into the sealing because they can't control the recoil. But, double-taps are fine. Being my first(and only time) at this range though, I decided to seek clarification.
Me: Hey, this says no rapid fire, but are double-taps okay?
Man behind the counter, already leary of my Washington State Concealed Carry Permit, and lack of a Connecticut Pistol License:
Does that mean you intened to pull the trigger more than once per second?
Me: Ummm....yes.
Man behind counter: That sounds like rapid fire to me.
Dude's attitude made me feel about two inches tall. But, his place, his rules. That, and the nearest other range that would rent to me was the Smith and Wesson range in Springfield, Mass, over an hour away.
I'll admit to not being sure of the 'tactical' validity of double-taps, but I know during my normal training sessions, I practice at least a couple of magazines that are nothing but double-taps, and if I ever find myself needing to use my gun in a defensive situation, well...double-taps is what I have been practicing.
Am I blowing this whole double-tap thing out of proportion in my attempts to be deffensively minded? I have always kind of wondered how that would come out in a trial:
Evil Lawyer looking to prosecute me for defending mine and my families life: So according to all the data, you pulled the trigger twice? How do you know the first bullet wouldn't have stopped the threat?
Just looking to get other folks thoughts on double-taps, and if anyone nows of a double-tap ever being used against someone in a court of law