Jim Watson
Member
This one isn't exactly a Pet Peeve, but a warning to gun shoppers, based on many posts on this and other boards.
It is very common for somebody to read the advertisements, magazine articles (about the same thing) and rave net reviews about a particular cartridge or calibre, either new on the market or old but overlooked, and buy a wonderful gun. They then find out that it has liabilities and are searching for an easy way out.
A powerful cartridge that will stop a criminal assailant or a charging buffalo in his tracks often turns out to have more recoil than is enjoyable in casual shooting.
It is also uncommon on the market either because it is new or because earlier generations have passed it by. Read, expensive.
So the customer is looking for ammo that costs less and/or kicks less. It probably isn't there, there is not the demand yet if ever. Even if he is a handloader and would expect to be able to tailor practice ammuntion to his liking, he may find a shortage of components and data to give him flexibility.
All I am saying is, think before you buy. Will you really make use of the claimed extra capability? If so, do you mind paying for it?
Addendum: The same thing applies to old stuff. Once upon a time, the Communists were unloading their surplus guns and ammo on us. You could shoot a SKS or AK as cheap as a .22. Probably not hitting as well, but it made a louder bang. Now there are daily whines about the shortage of cheap 7.62x39 ammo. Think it through. Buy a surplus gun if you want cheap, but realize the surplus ammo will dry up one of these days and you will have a $90 rifle taking dollar a pop ammunition.
It is very common for somebody to read the advertisements, magazine articles (about the same thing) and rave net reviews about a particular cartridge or calibre, either new on the market or old but overlooked, and buy a wonderful gun. They then find out that it has liabilities and are searching for an easy way out.
A powerful cartridge that will stop a criminal assailant or a charging buffalo in his tracks often turns out to have more recoil than is enjoyable in casual shooting.
It is also uncommon on the market either because it is new or because earlier generations have passed it by. Read, expensive.
So the customer is looking for ammo that costs less and/or kicks less. It probably isn't there, there is not the demand yet if ever. Even if he is a handloader and would expect to be able to tailor practice ammuntion to his liking, he may find a shortage of components and data to give him flexibility.
All I am saying is, think before you buy. Will you really make use of the claimed extra capability? If so, do you mind paying for it?
Addendum: The same thing applies to old stuff. Once upon a time, the Communists were unloading their surplus guns and ammo on us. You could shoot a SKS or AK as cheap as a .22. Probably not hitting as well, but it made a louder bang. Now there are daily whines about the shortage of cheap 7.62x39 ammo. Think it through. Buy a surplus gun if you want cheap, but realize the surplus ammo will dry up one of these days and you will have a $90 rifle taking dollar a pop ammunition.