SwearNoAllegiance
Member
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2008
- Messages
- 180
The OP's original post was predicated on the (incorrect) assumption they did.
Actually it did not. It ended with two questions. Knowledge about the practice and public thought was sought after. I am glad to know that they don't require the information. In my opinion, this thread was a success because now I have both.
Thank you all.