NRA Sounds Alarms on Gun Control

Status
Not open for further replies.

TnRebel

Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2006
Messages
133
Location
Kingsport, Tn.
It's coming. Don't say no one warned you.

-------------------------------------------------

NRA Sounds Alarms on Gun Control



The National Rifle Association is launching a preemptive attack on anticipated Democratic attempts to tighten gun control. The weapon: an illustrated pamphlet titled "Freedom in Peril.”

A draft of the document, which was recently leaked to the Internet, begins: "Second Amendment freedom stands naked in the path of a marching axis of adversaries far darker and more dangerous than gun owners have ever known. Acting alone and in shadowy coalitions, these enemies of freedom are preparing for a profound and foreboding confrontation in which they will not make the mistakes of their predecessors. We’d better be ready.”

The opening essay, "The Coming Confrontation,” is signed by two NRA executives, Wayne LaPierre and Chris W. Cox. It reads in part:

"It’s inevitable that terrorists will infest America for generations to come. It’s also inevitable that an anti-gun president will occupy the White House, and anti-gun forces will control the U.S. House and Senate . . .

"When these two certainties intersect, America’s anti-gun agenda will emerge in full force masquerading as an anti-terrorist agenda. Unless we face that moment, the final disarmament of law-abiding Americans will occur beneath the shroud of anti-terrorism legislation.”


The pamphlet takes shots at a variety of people and organizations that the NRA views as anti-gun. Among them:

# George Soros. "The Hungarian-born billionaire bankroller of a globalist jihad against firearm freedom, George Soros has been trying to revoke the Bill of Rights through his checkbook – to the tune of more than $100 million.

# Hillary Clinton. "It’s hard to find a more consistently anti-Second Amendment figure whose political success could turn back a quarter-century of advancement of our rights.”

# Sen. Dianne Feinstein. "Feinstein admitted that if it were up to her, guns would be banned and confiscated.”

# Sen. John Kerry. "Kerry has voted at least 51 times against gun owners’ rights, making him the most anti-gun presidential candidate in U.S. history.”

# Rep. Nancy Pelosi. "As the Democratic leader in the House, Pelosi represents a major threat to gun owners’ rights.”

# The United Nations. "Eliminating civilian ownership of firearms worldwide is a front-burner mission of the United Nations,” which the pamphlet calls "The One-World Extremists.”

# People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. "This eco-terrorism movement is so dangerous, the FBI has declared it America’s number one domestic terrorist threat.”

The pamphlet also chastises the media as "The Tragedy Chasers,” contains unflattering caricatures of Michael Moore, Katie Couric and Rosie O’Donnell, and laments the actions of authorities in New Orleans in the wake of Hurricane Katrina:

"For the first time in American history, New Orleans and other government officials ordered law enforcement officers to go door to door to confiscate firearms from law-abiding citizens at gunpoint.”
 
NRA = chicken little.

The sky is always falling, every year is the most important in history for gun owners, so give us more money.

They spew propaganda like any other organization with an agenda. Every year I've been a member it's same s***, different day.
 
Complacency and apathy are our (gunowners) biggest enemies that we face. If we continue to slam gunrights groups the divide that exists will only widen. And then we are doomed for sure! So everybody,,, Let's keep slamming the NRA! :rolleyes:
 
While I understand that the NRA has its own propaganda and may be sometimes a little over the top, it is to incite action out of the "it'll never happen" passive crowd who sits on their duffs doing nothing for our IIA rights. I think to deny that there's been a big shift in power to the antis is ridiculous. Certainly we've all been talking about coming AWBs on here for months now.

So yes, they tend to have a "sky is falling" tone to their documents, but there is always truth behind them. I think they figure if they sound like it's no big deal, then nobody will do anything about it. Politicians need to hear from us. And, yes, the NRA wants more money, but it's largely b/c that's the only way you get time with politicians and get anything done. Make no mistake about it... our politicians are money grubbing scum bags. Money talks. Interest groups with more money have more power. Period.

I've seen the inner circles of other political action groups pertaining to other non-firearm-related issues, and it's the same. If you don't have enough money, all the grassroots activism in the world won't help you b/c of our scumbag system of money-hungry power-seekers.

Just my $.02
 
This "leaked" pamphlet has been discussed at length in another thread I thought was here on THR but for some reason I can't find it now. A lot of people thought it was over the top and even racist, therefore threatening, no vowing, to cancel their memberships if it was in fact from the NRA. I'm assuming these are the Democrat members who can't stomach seeing their leaders criticized but turn a blind eye to their obvious anti-gun intentions.

I read it (have a copy on my HD) and I don't see a thing wrong with it. I've seen a similar style from LaPierre in fundrasing letters, etc. and I like it. The only thing I find over the top is the apathy so many gun owners and even NRA members have to the obvious danger to our rights this pamhplet attempts to expose.
 
Last edited:
While I understand that the NRA has its own propaganda and may be sometimes a little over the top, it is to incite action out of the "it'll never happen" passive crowd who sits on their duffs doing nothing for our IIA rights.

Indeed, however the NRA makes every year out to be the worst yet, and at the end of it, Uncle Jim still has his hunting rifle and 12 gauge, so what's the big deal? My point is that the NRA over-exaggerates to the max, and the members (us) may eventually start to question the gloom and doom attitude.

I think to deny that there's been a big shift in power to the antis is ridiculous. Certainly we've all been talking about coming AWBs on here for months now.

Also a valid point. I personally feel that this IS a time to rile the troops. Things ARE going to get nasty in the near future. But, you wouldn't know it from listening to the NRA, because they sound exactly like they have for years.

So yes, they tend to have a "sky is falling" tone to their documents, but there is always truth behind them. I think they figure if they sound like it's no big deal, then nobody will do anything about it. Politicians need to hear from us. And, yes, the NRA wants more money, but it's largely b/c that's the only way you get time with politicians and get anything done. Make no mistake about it... our politicians are money grubbing scum bags. Money talks. Interest groups with more money have more power. Period.

Absolutely, I agree completely.
 
Aside from the really vicious race-baiting and the very careful propaganda designed to turn NRA members into a bunch of simpering, cowering sheep who will cough up cash on demand, nope nothing.

If we see a 108th Congress that doesn't pass lots and lots of gun control will any of the alarmists say "Gee, maybe we were wrong?" Nope. It will be "They woulda, but we kept them from doing it. Send more money to Wayne La Pierre." If they do the message will be "We need to send more money to Wayne La Pierre."

The NRA leadership really is a bunch of cowards. First they stonewall. Then, when there's pretty serious proof they say it was "stolen", then "leaked", then that it was "just a working draft". There's never an admission that, yes, they did it.
 
Nick1911 said:
Indeed, however the NRA makes every year out to be the worst yet, and at the end of it, Uncle Jim still has his hunting rifle and 12 gauge, so what's the big deal?

Since the second amendment isn't about hunting, color me not impressed.
While the NRA may be engaging in some "scare tactics," the fact that Nancy Pelosi is now in charge of the House does make me concerned about another AWB. Maybe not this year. Perhaps they'll wait until they get Hitlery in the oval office.
Or maybe the fact that a lot of the new dems. are pretty good with respect to the 2A will mean we'll be okay. But don't be fooled. Pelosi and her ilk are the leadership and the newbies will be whipped into line behind her and Hitlery if the needs be. And the "line" for the Democrats is very antigun.

Let's not go to sleep, guys ... and keep your powder dry!!!!
 
Last edited:
go back to bed

nothing going on here, no threats to anyone. It's just the same old propoganda, no one is taking your guns. Who would do that? In fact, I've quit working out and training my shooting skills. . . I'm tired of being called chicken little. I just get home from work and watch T.V. and drink beer. Freedom will always exist. Someone else will defend it for me. Pass the remote, I'm tired, where's my medication?
 
Your point is well made Sam.

Sometimes I thinks a "tongue in cheek" ageement may be better than an attempt to open the eyes of those who are determined to keep them closed while saying, in effect, "I see no threat."
 
the "germ of truth" statement is accurate. I've always filtered the fund raising retoric but find that they characterize the aims of the usual suspects very well. they really do want to take the guns. they really do want to empower the United Nations over the United States. They would like to take over health care and reestablish a lock on the news media.
 
Sorry guys, but every year IS the worst year because things are always getting progressively worse.

Transport my father from 1964 or from 1976 to today and he'd be disgusted by all the changes.

We only don't pay much attention to how bad it is always getting for 2 reasons imho, 1) it gets worse slowly, year after year, bit by bit and 2) government controlled education makes it so that each generation knows less and cares less.

Last year WAS the worst year, up to that point. So yes, this year IS the worst year. And next year WILL BE the worst year. :neener:
 
The worst thing about liberal politicians is that they can't admit that 40 years of social engineering have made the ghettos, worse, not better; and rather that admit the street crime problem is unsolveable by these means, they seek to place blame on middle-class gun owners instead.

In some circles, that transference of responsibility wins elections, year after year.

Look at Philadelphia, NYC and Chicago; murders are climbing -- yet the mayors of each of these cities ignore the root of the problem (a culture of criminality) and are trying to scare and sue surrounding locales into adopting more bad law to fix THEIR problems.

And no, they're not going to give up. They've got no idea on how to actually fight crime (without upsetting their constituencies).
 
You have nothing to fear

Just take it from all of us in the Democrat controlled states of Illinois or California. Look how well we have done trusting that the Dems will let us keep our "hunting rifles and shotguns"... for now anyway.

"Uncle Jim still has his hunting rifle and 12 gauge, so what's the big deal?"

This is the kind of divide and conquer thinking that put Illinois behind the 8 ball with FOID cards, outright gun and magazine bans, a state AWB on the way, uncompensated confiscations in Chicago and Cook County. That's not my personal opinion, that's simple fact.

Now, all of you don't worry about the nice conservative Democrats and any gun bans, the NRA is just fear mongering, sit back and take it easy.

Hey, wait a minute, didn't we have this conversation in 1994?
 
It's not all down hill. Like in the late 1960s, the Us Congress let a Saturday night special bill through one house (don't remember which.) Ted Kennedy was the major Senate author. This one outlawed all handguns with less than a 14" barrel.
California set up a ballot initiative in the early 70s to ban all handguns. It was going to pass by 2/3rds. People who hadn't voted in years came out and defeated it by the same margin and absolutedly slaughtered the extreme leftists in the Calif. legislature for good measure. I remember a gape toothed cultural marxist named Tunney who was the son of the famous boxer and somebody name Hiakawa(sp?).

In the 50s and 60s, in our part of Texas you had to go before a judge before you could buy a handgun. The DPS strongly encouraged or required dealers to report all sales of handguns for a non-legal registration program. You could keep a handgun at home, carry it "while traveling" if you didn't mind getting arrestedand going to court- or while carrying large sums of money. Target shooting and hunting didn't become exceptions until 1979 and you could still get arrested if a local law enforcement officer either didn't know the law or didn't care what it said.

Since 1996, we (and a lot of other states) have gotten shall-issue license laws and general expansion of exceptions to the carry prohibition that include regarding a vehicle with sleeping quarters as a private residence and persons with handguns in vehicles as bonified travelers .

CBS, NBC and ABC had a total lock on mass media news and entertainment and regularly put forth documentaries on the "tragic proliferation of firearms." Weekly entertainment series featured gun control themes that ran right before votes on major national gun legislation. What with cablevision competing networks and a widespread realization that the old major media is leftist/internationalist, we at least have a certain amount of balance that was absent before.
 
Fear mongering? Damn straight. After this last election, there's good reason to fear.

The worst thing about liberal politicians is that they can't admit that 40 years of social engineering have made the ghettos, worse, not better...

Yes, well, leftist lawmakers don't have to live with the hell they create.
 
The worst thing about liberal politicians is that they can't admit that 40 years of social engineering have made the ghettos, worse, not better...
I can only hope you don't believe your own line.
 
I fear the antis and their police state dreams. I know they wish to kill me and they want to get away with it.

I fear Maryland when police kicked in the doors of the office of opponents of a gun control measure in 1988.

I fear Chicago, New York City, Boston, New Orleans, California, New Jersey, Massachusetts, I fear Congress wishing to impose their slave-driven, termite mound utopia on me. I have lived in the Belly of Beast in D.C. and Chicago, where I feared a fire which would have lead to a search of my apartments and me being in jail.

I feared having to use my guns which would have lead to me being under a prison. I feared talking about guns and having myself investigated or turned in on the snitch lines for $100. I feared the proposed door to door searches for guns in D.C. and Chicago when the gang bloodshed was daily news.

I am not Uncle Jim but I am Uncle Kirk and in Chicago and D.C. I could not have my shotgun or rifle. I have feared the jack-booted thugs in police uniforms or in expensive suits. Congress wants me to experience that same fear now.

Nick, just because you live in a good place does not mean everyone does. Plenty of people here who can tell you what it is like when your government decides that you must be disarmed.
 
"My point is that the NRA over-exaggerates to the max, and the members (us) may eventually start to question the gloom and doom attitude."

Us? You maybe. Are you, how shall I put this, that impressionable? All organizations have agendas.

"But, you wouldn't know it from listening to the NRA, because they sound exactly like they have for years."

I disagree. I know it. You don't - obviously.

John
 
Indeed, however the NRA makes every year out to be the worst yet, and at the end of it, Uncle Jim still has his hunting rifle and 12 gauge, so what's the big deal? My point is that the NRA over-exaggerates to the max, and the members (us) may eventually start to question the gloom and doom attitude.

Ever heard of Chicago? It funny how so many members of this forum want guns to protect their rights and freedoms but they refuse to defend their gun rights by simply picking up a pen.
 
Remember Ted Kennedy's proposed amendment to "Ban the cop killing .30-30"?

I do.
And so do you.

Get your voice heard loud and long in Congress via some organization they respect (or fear, whatever).

Or watch as any ammunition that can pierce kevlar vests finds its way into legislation... to keep our nation safe.
 
As long as the spectre of "gun control" is out there, the NRA, and a few other groups will have my support. Do I agree with everything they say or do, no, however, they are THE major player for our 2A rights. That didn't happen by chance. How many states have "shall issue"? I'd sure hate to see that go away here in Michigan. Sure, keep bashing all you like, you can turn in your life preserver first. It sure is easy to write checks and vote. Want change in the NRA? Step up and get to work. Ever lobbied the Gov.? Whining and complaining to each other wasn't quite enough to stop the last big attack on our rights(AWB), and likeley won't stop the next assault either(and, mark me well, there WILL be more). Maybe some jobs ARE better left to professionals. I believe whole-heartedly the false god of "gun control" will be dusted off and rolled back into national view up there in Washing-toon. Best to stay vigilant and "guard jealously" our rights. Those who think otherwise are whistling past the graveyard of history. The other old line applicable here:
"If we don't hang together................." Think about it.

One other thing that bothers me about US is how few "younger-than-gray-haired" shooters there are. I do, and we should all, make every effort to involve the young. It ain't "rocket surgery".

Josh....(rant OFF)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top