Officers weapon Jams at worst possible moment

Status
Not open for further replies.

jsalcedo

Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2002
Messages
3,683
Officer's gun misfired
Probers say malfunction cost policeman's life
By PEGGY O'HARE
Copyright 2003 Houston Chronicle

Veteran Houston police officer Charles R. Clark's gun failed him at
the worst possible moment, costing him his life.

As he barreled into a southeast Houston check-cashing store trying to stop a robbery in progress, he was gunned down in a horrifically cold-blooded fashion after his own weapon malfunctioned, according to investigators who recounted the crime to the Chronicle on condition of anonymity.

The revelations offer a harrowing picture of what happened inside the Ace America's Cash Express in the 5700 block of the South Loop East when Clark responded, alone, to the April 3 robbery.

Clark, 45, was the first of two officers to arrive at the robbery. He
didn't wait for back-up, but ran inside, knowing a store employee was in distress.

Clark was shot in the shoulder. He managed to return fire with one round, but his gun jammed.

As the wounded officer tried to call for help, speaking his last
words, someone placed a gun very close to his head and pulled the trigger. The bullet slammed through the top of his skull.

Clerk Alfredia Jones, who had been dragged from the back of the store to the front and was standing just a few feet away from the officer, had no chance to hide, investigators said. The 27-year-old single mother of two was killed next, evidence and statements indicate.

Dashan Vadell Glaspie, 21; Elijah Dwayne Joubert, 23; and Alfred
Dewayne Brown, 21, are each charged with capital murder and are being held without bail in the slayings of Clark and Jones.

At least two of those men were armed when Clark confronted them just before his own weapon malfunctioned, said Houston Police Lt. Nelson Zoch. Investigators still are waiting for an official report from the ballistics lab to find out why that happened.

"Why it malfunctioned and what caused that, I can't tell you that,"
Zoch said Tuesday. "If you're alone there and your gun's
malfunctioning, and two other people have guns -- that's a cop's worst nightmare.

"It was a tragic day, and the only thing we can do to make that dayn better is to get the guys who did it," Zoch said.

Clark was carrying his own weapon that day, a 9 mm with which he was qualified, police officials said.

HPD does not provide guns and ammunition to its officers. Rather,
officers bring their own guns to the job and must qualify with their
weapon once a year in order to keep their certification as peace
officers, as required by the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement Officer Standards.

Over the years, HPD has tried to establish some uniformity and
standardization in the type of weapons approved for uniformed duty.

In September 1997, the department narrowed the type of weapons to .40-caliber semiautomatic pistols, manufactured by Smith and Wesson, Glock, Baretta and Sig Sauer. Officers such as Clark, who were with HPD before those latest regulations took effect, were grandfathered in and allowed to continue using the weapons they'd relied on for years,
as long as it was a .38-caliber weapon or bigger.

Clark's death, said Hans Marticiuc, head of the Houston Police
Officers Union, "was one of those flukey-type deals. You don't know about a mechanical breakdown until it happens."

Investigators said they were not aware of Clark reporting any previous problems with his gun.

Any number of reasons could cause a weapon to malfunction, officers said, such as improper lubrication and cleaning; faulty ammunition; moisture seeping into the powder inside the ammunition, perhaps if the gun had recently been cleaned and oiled; human error made by recoiling or "breaking" the wrist improperly after the gun is fired or perhaps bumping the gun against something as it was fired; or the gun being
altered by an outside source.
 
Tragic!

1. Have backup.

2. Wait for backup.

3. Don't go in without backup.

I'm morbidly curious about the gun he had. :(
 
If he was hit in the shoulder and then returned fire, he was probably shooting one-handed and limp-wristed it. Sucks.
 
Sad indeed.....:( He acted without selfishness in attempt to save the clerks life. I only wish he would have succeeded as the three men will most certainly get to "wait for their turn".........at taxpayer expense.
 
The article doesn't go into what the officer encountered when he arrived on the scene. We don't know if he felt that he had to take immediate action to save the clerks life.

That said, like in the 507th Maint Co ambush in Iraq, this may have been a training failure and not a weapons failure. It's hard to draw too many conclusions from the information we were provided.

Jeff
 
Blackhawk,

I agree with your statements as a general rule but sometimes people in positions like a police officer have to do incredibly unsafe things (known deadly force situation) without the luxury of backup. Its hard to say if that was the case this time or not, but it appears it might have been. Either way though, sad day for the Houston PD.
 
Like Reed, I suspect his injury caused his hold to "weaken." It may well be a malfunction attributable to the shooter and not to the firearm. Tragic results. :(
 
Smith and Wesson, Glock, Baretta and Sig Sauer...

I guess they all had decent weapons... but what is a Baretta?
Sorry, jokes aside... this is a sad event.

Let this be a lesson to the rest of us... take care of our guns so they can take care of us.





:(
 
Blackhawk, I am surprised by your comment of wanting the cop to wait for backup. The way I read the article, he saw the robbery in progress, with a woman being held by 2 or 3 BG's. He then just barges in and does the best he can to try and stop it, ignoring the obvious risks to himself. Very un-selfish and Very heroic! (Yeah, and in hindsight - stupid.)

But what if he waited for backup ... that sounds too much like Columbine, where many of us scolded the cops for waiting for backup instead of rushing in to help the students and teachers!
 
What was the gun that jammed?

I didn't catch from the article what kind of 9mm he had that jammed? Glock 17?
 
That was my first thought too: injured and he limp-wristed.

I sold my last auto in '98, and won't ever buy another. If he'd have gone in blazing with a nice big 357 or better and kept his head, he'd have won.
 
Sorry to hear that. I own about eight autos and enjoy shooting them, but would never trust my life to one. It's too bad that officer didn't have a 686 with seven rounds of 125-gr .357 ammo. They would have been carrying out the perp's bodies instead of his.
 
His decision to go in was his decision.
For a long time in Le the training was to wait for the bad guys to leave and then take them out.
After Columbine this was found to not always be the best response.
Many agencies, mine included, have enacted "active shooter" training, where you go in and take out, errrrrrrr stop the bad guys actions.
In the training, they encourage you not to go in alone, but sometimes a man has gotta do what a man has gotta do.

This officer obviously felt the need to go in and attempt to handle the situation, sadly it didn't go his way and he paid the ultimate price.

RIP Officer Clark, your bravery will not be forgotten by me.
 
Blackhawk, I am surprised by your comment of wanting the cop to wait for backup. The way I read the article, he saw the robbery in progress, with a woman being held by 2 or 3 BG's. He then just barges in and does the best he can to try and stop it, ignoring the obvious risks to himself. Very un-selfish and Very heroic!
That's just it, Dave.

There are MANY, MANY LEOs, soldiers, and other good guys who get tunnel vision when confronted with such situations. They automatically switch into hero mode when all their danger circuits fire, and they will predictably react without regard for their personal safety. May God bless them all!

However, that's why the backup rule has to be pounded into them again and again. Harry Callahan is a fictional character. Most cops going up alone and in a frontal assault against 2-3 BGs are going into a death situation. Once the assault begins, the shooting starts and things go downhill rapidly. If the LEO had given the backup rule more consideration, he likely would have done the one best thing: delayed the start of shooting. The BGs hadn't killed anybody yet, so they still hadn't gone past the point of no return.

Having natural heroic inclinations is wonderful and should be a job requirement for LEOs, soldiers, etc., but learning how to survive in spite of them is every bit as important as being proficient with the other tools they use. One of those tools consists of a set of rules, including the backup rule.

Charles R. Clark's death is a tragedy and he was absolutely a hero. But he's dead. If he'd followed the rule, he might not be, even if all it did was delay things enough for him to mount a better tactical assault by himself.
 
Sad. Sounds like a very good officer laid down his life to protect others.
I see this is becomming a revolver vs autoloader. Please start a new thread for that. Thanks.
 
Clerk Alfredia Jones, who had been dragged from the back of the store to the front and was standing just a few feet away from the officer, had no chance to hide, investigators said. The 27-year-old single mother of two was killed next, evidence and statements indicate.

Alfredia Jones should have been armed and carrying concealed on the job. Then, she would have been in a position to help Officer Clark give those lowlifes some deserved dirtnaps. :cuss:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top