Oft-Robbed Convenience Store Fights Back [Pro Gun Anecdote]

Status
Not open for further replies.

CmdrSlander

Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2011
Messages
1,203
Location
Disputed Western Missouri
There is a convenience store (which shall remain nameless) up the road from me where I often stop for Diet Dr. Pepper, gasoline, and other such necessities; it was on the verge of being robbed out of business despite being in a 'good part of town.' On at least two occasions armed thugs have robbed the store, taking both goods and the cash on hand at the time, these robberies have occurred late at night and in the early morning hours. Though the financial loss was minimal in the grand scheme of things, the psychological effect on the owners drove them to sell the store at a loss and move on. The store was sold to a pair of Indians, brothers as I understand it, both of them immigrants and newly minted U.S. citizens. They were intent on avoiding the fate of the previous owners.

On my recommendation, they exercised their Second Amendment rights and purchased a Remington 870 Express Tactical shotgun to defend the store. Furthermore, going well above and beyond the requirements to own a firearm, both the owners and their staff went to a firearms training class to familiarize themselves with the shotgun. They were also taught how to handle the weapon under stress, etc.

Several weeks later, the criminal element again reared its ugly head. Late at night, a man in a hoodie entered the store and milled around suspiciously, he then approached the counter and began to draw a knife... only to find a 12 gauge, in the hands of the clerk, a recent immigrant from Chad, pointed squarely at his face. Without a single shot being fired, the would be robber turned tail and ran off into the night.

Six months later, and the store has not been attacked since that night. The police believe, as they related to the store's owners, that the criminals in the area have informed one another that the new management at [STORE NAME OMITTED] are not to be trifled with.

------------------------

The Antis would like you to believe that introducing a gun into the situation in the first part of the post would have been unhelpful, even dangerous. Instead, a gun not only protected the life and property of the store's owners and staff, the knowledge of its presence has dissuaded others from robbing the store.

Another interesting point is that the store's previous, natural born American owners refused to arm themselves on political grounds, while the new owners and staff (all of them immigrants) not only armed themselves but got training in the use of their weapon. I was proud of them for zealously exercising their newfound right to bear arms. Only in America, my friends, only in America.

Discuss.
 
That's one for the good guys

Good things tend to happen when citizens stand up to criminals.
 
Only in "some States" in America, my friends, only in America.
I amended your last line a tad bit, but agree with your intended meaning.

I do wonder about the new owners insurance carrier's thoughts in this regard, as I assume that most signage stating "No Weapons", etc, and corporate dictums along the same lines are a result of potential legal fal de ral as a result of our extremely Litigiou$ $ociety. :rolleyes:
 
I amended your last line a tad bit, but agree with your intended meaning.

I do wonder about the new owners insurance carrier's thoughts in this regard, as I assume that most signage stating "No Weapons", etc, and corporate dictums along the same lines are a result of potential legal fal de ral as a result of our extremely Litigiou$ $ociety. :rolleyes:
Pardon my ignorance, but which states in America prohibit the ownership of a lowly pump shotgun?
 
CmdrSlander: Excellent.

I've recommended the same thing to a few foreign managers or owners of gas stations, and am always met with silence and a blank stare. This latest was a few days ago at a station by ATL Airport hotels on infamous Virginia Ave. The guy stood behind very thick plexiglass.

Maybe some of these guys are not quite US citizens, but if this were the only obstacle to legal gun ownership, wouldn't at least one of them acknowledge the deterrent effect of displaying a gun? It's unlikely, but can Indian citizens own a gun back home in India?
 
Pardon my ignorance, but which states in America prohibit the ownership of a lowly pump shotgun?
Cmdr, I wasn't referring to pump shotguns per se, but active defense with no prosecution by the local DA etc., and I may be wrong as well by saying "States" as opposed to "cities" or "counties" because I could see someone in Chicago, DC or NYC or other places where guns and those who use them even legally, are considered lessors by their ruling betters. I did think that MA has a duty to retreat law, but I may be wrong as well in my thinking in that regard.

Nor would I ever claim you were ignorant. Mea Culpa if I offended, not my intent, ever, Sir.
 
CmdrSlander: Excellent.

I've recommended the same thing to a few foreign managers or owners of gas stations, and am always met with silence and a blank stare. This latest was a few days ago at a station by ATL Airport hotels on infamous Virginia Ave. The guy stood behind very thick plexiglass.

Maybe some of these guys are not quite US citizens, but if this were the only obstacle to legal gun ownership, wouldn't at least one of them acknowledge the deterrent effect of displaying a gun? It's unlikely, but can Indian citizens own a gun back home in India?
Gun ownership in India is a privilege under the Arms Act of 1959.[34] The Arms Act of 1959 and the Arms Rules of 1962 were derived from the text of the Indian Arms Act of 1876 created by the British Rulers in view of the 1857 rebellion against the East India company.[35]
To obtain a license to own a firearm, a person has to prove that there exists "threat to life."[citation needed] Once a license is obtained, there are several restrictions on caliber (9mm, .303 British .45 ACP are prohibited along with several other calibers) and types of firearms (semiautomatic rifles, short barrel shotguns, and automatic weapons are not allowed for civilians).[citation needed] A license is limited to three firearms under section 3 of the Arms Act 1959.[35] Under the wake of terror the government is considering making the rules even more stringent.[citation needed] In response to increased governmental regulations, Indians on the online forum Indians for Guns organized to form the National Association for Gun Rights India (NAGRI) to protect and increase their ability to obtain and use firearms for self-defense against street crime and terrorism.[34]

-From Wikipedia [Gun Politics #India]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top