OK, that's it. I am done!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Brutuskend

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2020
Messages
371
Location
Oregon
Buying BP pistols.


Maybe.

Right....
I was toying with the idea of buying a 1862 NYMP pistol but I couldn't find anyone who had them in stock.
Today I went by the gun works in Springfield to pick something up ( that they didn't have ) and mentioned that I was looking for a pocket police and lo and behold, they had 3 uberti's in stock. So I am now the proud owner of one.

This is also my first uberti. I AM LIKING it!!

20201202_170426.jpg
 
The Pocket 36 were the culmination of advances in metallurgy and design. The same process that made the 1860 possible was adapted to the 1848, 31 caliber frame to produce the Pocket Navy and the Pocket Police Models.

I have a few and find them enjoyable.

Kevin
 
Given the similarities of design between the 1860 and this 1862 as shown in post #4, it's a wonder they didn't call it the Baby Army, or Baby 1860. Like the did with the Baby Dragoon.

Dave
 
True, and even the paper money was HUGE back then!
Completely Irrelevant to the rest of the thread, but I've been collecting paper money for roughly 14 yeas: Today, that type of paper money is referred to as "Horse Blanket". it's a general term for bigger-sized currency, but it began when referring to ( Correct me if I'm wrong) the 1923 Silver $1 Banknote. Just a fun fact I suppose.

dickydalton , Did you, by any chance and out of sheer curiosity, make any of those holsters yourself?
 
Completely Irrelevant to the rest of the thread, but I've been collecting paper money for roughly 14 yeas: Today, that type of paper money is referred to as "Horse Blanket". it's a general term for bigger-sized currency, but it began when referring to ( Correct me if I'm wrong) the 1923 Silver $1 Banknote. Just a fun fact I suppose.

dickydalton , Did you, by any chance and out of sheer curiosity, make any of those holsters yourself?
No Sir I didn't. I got them from Dell's Leatherworks and have a few more of them along with more Colts!
 
Perhaps "pocket" was just a term to indicate a smaller, or downsized pistol, (like "pocket battleship" or "pocket submarine") and wasn't meant to suggest it was actually meant to be carried in a pocket, although one could easily do so in the big over coats that were in use at the time. ? Seems it would be much more comfortable to carry it in a holster, or even just IWB. And except for very cold weather, I'm not sure anyone would want to wear one of them big giant overcoats. Anyhow....yeah, I want one.
 
The original Colt Pocket revolver .31 caliber started with the 1848 Pocket Model with a squareback trigger guard, short frame/short forcing cone. It was soon superseded with the 1849 Pocket Model which had a longer frame/barrel forcing cone and a round trigger guard. Colt was not picky about what parts fit either revolver for historical purposes, hence there are some 1848 models that had a round trigger guard, and some 1849 models with a squareback trigger guard, early on.

1848-Pocket-31-Replica-Arms-ASM-001.jpg

The 1862 Pocket Police/Pocket Navy revolvers were produced using the Pocket frame that had the water table cut for a .36 caliber rebated cylinder like Colt used with the 1860 Army on the cut Navy frame.

Uberti-Pocket-Navy.jpg

The 1847 Walker/1848 Dragoon .44 (in four flavors) were considered "holster" pistols, which meant they were to be carried in holsters on the saddle pommel of a horse for cavalry purposes. In 1850 Colt designed the 1851 Navy .36 as a "belt" pistol to be worn on the person, not the horse. The same term was applied to the 1860 Colt Army .44 and the 1861 Navy .36.

All terms are relative to the revolver size.

These are scans from Pate's book The Colt Model 1860 Army Revolver showing Colt Army contracts (in 1859/1860) that specify "holster" pistols [the excess 1848 Dragoon 3rd Model revolvers with shoulder stocks (one stock per two revolvers)] that Colt was trying to get rid of in preparation for his introduction of the 1860 Army .44 revolver, and the "belt" pistols refer to his stocks of 1851 Navy revolvers.

The arrows are mine.

Pate-001.jpg

Pate-002.jpg

I hope this clears up any misperceptions.

Regards,

Jim
 
Pocket model of Navy Caliber (both police and pocket navy) as per Cap and Ball youtube video. The one I handled now appears to be in working order with corrected greased arbor and some file work. It has no cap guard/post manhattan modification. I noticed a youtube video where another mainspring was installed on top the already installed mainspring that seemed to have significantly lowered the instance of cap jams. The mainspring screw is long enough to hold both one on top of the other.

I wonder if the older 19th century pocket revolvers had stiffer mainsprings than the current replicas.
 
To qualify as a pocket revolver, it only has 5 shots instead of 6.

I think with the better quality steel "Silver Steel" Colt was able to make larger calibers with smaller frames and cylinders that can fit into pockets. The relatively weak .31 caliber pocket revolver was Colts best seller overall and among the civilian population. Small portable multi shot pistols were highly desired by the general public.

The pocket models of Navy Caliber was Colt's evolution of the .31 pocket model into something more potent as well as the latest evolution overall of their cap and ball revolvers. They probably would have been even better sellers but the introduction of cartridge guns including revolvers was right around the corner and cartridge firearms became the new standard for obvious reasons.

They did convert a lot of pocket models into cartridge guns.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top