I just got into reloading "to save money." Here's what I've spent and how I might do it differently:
Expenses irrespective of "single-stage," "turret," or "progressive," and what color it is:
tumbler with stainless media 259.99
media separator 7.99
case blocks (4) 35.96
case prep center 120.71
trimmer 8.09
press stand (or workbench) 108.99
bin rack 10.79
chronograph 101.61
one set of dies 46.49
subtotal 700.62
notes: Some of these items may be unnecessary, some may already be possessed. For me, I already had a tripod and head for the chronograph. Consider that these expenses could be more than 2/3rds the total expense. Another expense unaccounted for is the shed or garage workspace.
powder measure 59.91
powder measure stand 35.91
press 122.5
die rack 10.79
die lock rings 25.98
hand priming tool 59.99
subtotal 315.08
notes: Most of the equipment is LEE, with some RCBS. I went with a single-stage press, a separate powder measure, and hand-priming tool. That's the way I like to work. It can be done for less, but the small savings from say priming on the press won't make a difference in the big picture. Stepping up to a Dillon progressive press could increase the expense in this latter category considerably, without reducing the former category.
Reloading a cartridge where factory ammo costs $0.29 per round, primer, powder and bullets are costing $0.16 - $0.20 (depending on bullet and powder choice). If I load the most economical of choices among my preferences at $0.16 per round, I'll break-even after some 8000 rounds, which will probably be less than a year.
"I could save even more if I bought bullet casting equipment." I decided not to and I load jacketed or plated bullets only for health reasons.
It makes sense to account for the expense of labor to reload. I think most reloaders enjoy it, but we all consider how much time we're willing to spend on any part of it. Who wants to clean 1000 primer pockets by hand? We buy equipment to save labor costs, trading money for time. Dillon suggests various models of their presses will load 400-1000 rounds per hour. I could be done with my production needs for a year after only a day of reloading, but others shoot a lot more than I do and producing tens of thousands of rounds per year would take too long on a single-stage. At that volume, break-even and savings would happen sooner too, even with higher capital expenditures.
I figured out what I need to do is buy a gun that will shoot more expensive ammo, so I can save more reloading.
Expenses irrespective of "single-stage," "turret," or "progressive," and what color it is:
tumbler with stainless media 259.99
media separator 7.99
case blocks (4) 35.96
case prep center 120.71
trimmer 8.09
press stand (or workbench) 108.99
bin rack 10.79
chronograph 101.61
one set of dies 46.49
subtotal 700.62
notes: Some of these items may be unnecessary, some may already be possessed. For me, I already had a tripod and head for the chronograph. Consider that these expenses could be more than 2/3rds the total expense. Another expense unaccounted for is the shed or garage workspace.
powder measure 59.91
powder measure stand 35.91
press 122.5
die rack 10.79
die lock rings 25.98
hand priming tool 59.99
subtotal 315.08
notes: Most of the equipment is LEE, with some RCBS. I went with a single-stage press, a separate powder measure, and hand-priming tool. That's the way I like to work. It can be done for less, but the small savings from say priming on the press won't make a difference in the big picture. Stepping up to a Dillon progressive press could increase the expense in this latter category considerably, without reducing the former category.
Reloading a cartridge where factory ammo costs $0.29 per round, primer, powder and bullets are costing $0.16 - $0.20 (depending on bullet and powder choice). If I load the most economical of choices among my preferences at $0.16 per round, I'll break-even after some 8000 rounds, which will probably be less than a year.
"I could save even more if I bought bullet casting equipment." I decided not to and I load jacketed or plated bullets only for health reasons.
It makes sense to account for the expense of labor to reload. I think most reloaders enjoy it, but we all consider how much time we're willing to spend on any part of it. Who wants to clean 1000 primer pockets by hand? We buy equipment to save labor costs, trading money for time. Dillon suggests various models of their presses will load 400-1000 rounds per hour. I could be done with my production needs for a year after only a day of reloading, but others shoot a lot more than I do and producing tens of thousands of rounds per year would take too long on a single-stage. At that volume, break-even and savings would happen sooner too, even with higher capital expenditures.
I figured out what I need to do is buy a gun that will shoot more expensive ammo, so I can save more reloading.