One of Massad Ayoob's favorite... the Ruger P Series in .45 ACP

Status
Not open for further replies.

Miami_JBT

Member
Joined
May 19, 2009
Messages
1,246
Location
Big Bend of FL, originally from Miami.
I don't remember if I posted this or not.

MASSAD AYOOB'S FAVORITES, THE RUGER P-SERIES IN .45 ACP

Ruger, a name that is synonymous with American blue collar worker affordability and reliable quality. Starting off back in the days before color was invented. Ruger as a firearms company made .22LR chambered pistols, rifles, and single action cowboy guns. From there, they expanded into hunting and duty guns. Doing very well with their Security/Speed Six line of revolvers. A number of law enforcement agencies purchased them, including the US Department of Defense as COTS replacements for .38 Special chambered guns needed for MPs, SPs, and the like. They also did very well on the civilian side, being well made but affordable.

LDxo0Vh.jpg

But the writing was on the wall and old Bill Ruger wanted part of what was coming. The US Military was looking at replacing the aging slab side .45 with a sleek new double stack wunderwaffe chambered in that foreign eurocentric 9x19mm. So the Ruger P85 was developed...

ro2oqZp.jpg

And it was eventually submitted into the US Army's XM10 Trials.

1jpIADl.jpg

Yes, that is a hotdog squirt gun and no, it isn't fake. That picture is from the U.S. Army’s Rock Island Arsenal Museum Archives of the actual XM10 trials. The squirt gun was put in the photo as a joke since everyone knew what the outcome would be.

Anyways, the Ruger P85 was submitted and it didn't win. But that didn't stop Ruger from proceeding with releasing the gun into the market. They got some nibbles with it. The Wisconsin State Patrol adopted the updated model, the P89 and some other smaller agencies or private purchased by officers. But for the most part, the P-Series always struggled to catch the eye of law enforcement agencies.

The P-Series guns are reliable but very rough. The ergonomics were full of sharp edges, the triggers weren't anything special to write about, and they did weigh. Their biggest selling point was price. You got a lot of gun for the price. But S&W, Beretts, Sig, and Glock beat them. Glock for their hyper aggressive marketing and practicality giving their guns away. Sig for their very good PR image as European quality. S&W because of their heavily entrenched sales due to their control during the revolver era. Also don't forget about Beretta. They were extremely popular due to being the US Military's official sidearm.

But that was the 9mm guns. This article is all about the .45 ACP guns right? Yup, sure is. So Let me delve into them. Ruger was originally developing a 10mm Auto version of the P89 since the 10mm Auto was the new hotness and the FBI just recently adopted the cartridge in S&W's Model 1076. But that market crashed and burned with the FBI starting to have issues with the gun and more importantly, the lack of overall sales that Big Blue's 10mm Auto failed to garner with agencies across the US. So Ruger redesigned their 10mm project by re-chambering it in .45 Auto and releasing the Model P90 in 1991.

dpraUyB.jpg

It is a bruiser of a gun. Weighing in at 34oz and coming from the factory with two 7rd magazines. The gun was doomed for failure. Why? Because in that same year, GLOCK released the G21 and that was a much lighter gun and had twice the capacity. But I'm going off on a tangent here.

Okay, back on track. The P90 while outclassed by GLOCK, was a good gun. It was affordable, reliable, and capable.

tvxkh0n.jpg

The gun held itself against its period rivals like the Colt Series 90 Double Eagle, the Sig P220, and the S&W Model 4506. All of them were single stack, 8rd, DA/SA, metal framed guns and the Ruger P90 beat them all in price.

Massad Ayoob, famed firearms instructor and author of such works like In the Gravest Extreme: The Role of the Firearm in Personal Protection was also a cop with a little place in Grantham, NH.

zcgpDVz.jpg

Grantham, NH is just up the road from Ruger's Newport, New Hampshire production facility and Ruger was known to give area police departments free guns. The Grantham PD, being spend thrift and budget conscious accepted the offer of free Model P90 pistols and put them to use. Mr. Ayoob being one of them.

wgkqewk.jpg

Here you see Massad Ayoob conducting informational video for what to do as a gun owner during a traffic stop. On his hip is a Ruger P-Series .45 Auto. You can see the classic stainless single stack mags and the stainless slide.

So the gun had some small success as you can see. But it still wasn't doing that great. What really extended the life of the gun was the 1994 Clinton Assault Weapons Ban. Suddenly, everything that could hold more than 10rds was verboten. So those fancy wonder-nines and their 15rd-17rd capacities were neutered. Guns like the Ruger P90 became popular. If you were limited to 10rds or less. Then a big bruiser of a .45 Auto made more sense.

In 1997, Ruger again released another .45 Auto, this time it was with a polymer frame and a more contoured finish. Gone are the rough and sharp edges of the P90.

9pnqnDF.jpg

The P97 was lighter, cheaper to make, and shipped from the factory with 8rd mags now instead of the older 7rd mags. Best of all, the newer mags could be used in the older P90. And like with the P90, Ruger offered the P97 to the Grantham PD for free. Massad Ayoob carried it too and wrote about how he liked the gun.

Massad Ayoob always preached that he felt confident with the P90 and P97. The guns worked, they were affordable, and they did the same job as the other higher priced guns on the market. And so, he basically endorsed the guns by buying his own and competing with them. And Ruger loved that.

But storm clouds were on the horizon. The 2000s were coming and the P97, while relatively new. Was still outdated. There were flaws with the gun. The grip was slipperly, there was no way to add a light, and the gun was clunky as a off duty and CCW piece. So Ruger went back to the drawing board and the end result was the P345. Basically a slicked up and modernized version of the P97 and released it in 2004.

FXk8hCf.jpg

The P345 was everything that the market wanted. slim countered polymer with a nice textured grip, a rounded and melted slide with no sharp edges. Gone is the giant bat wings of a safety/decocker and the gun was still affordable and chambered in .45 Auto and even used the same magazines.

Massad Ayoob loved it.

7DEZW6I.jpg

Like with the two previous models, Ruger gave free P345s to the Grantham PD. The gun did exceptionally well in Massad Ayoob's hands. The Ruger P345 was a sleeper hit. I recall being in the Miami, FL gun show at the fairgrounds and the guns flying off dealer tables. It was doing so well that Ruger had the P345 outright replace the P97 and Massad Ayoob was doing a number of articles about the gun.

But then suddenly, the popularity of the gun fell like Wile E. Coyote off a cliff.

What happened? The Clinton AWB expired in September of 2004 and suddenly, the idea of having a 8rd single stack .45 Auto didn't seem as enticing since you could now get a GLOCK 17 and 17rd magazines weren't $100 per mag anymore. So with that, the P90 and P345 continued to limp along. Both ending production before 2010 when Ruger outright canceled the P-Series.

But it was because of Massad Ayoob's writings that I always wanted a P90 and much later a P345. And today, luckily, I have both.

MsQ5RVC.jpg

L1baZtZ.jpg

Sure, they aren't my main go to guns. But they are damn nice for the price I paid and they remind of a different era in handgun development and the of the times that articles were printed on paper and I had to wait a months on end to get them in the mail.

So thanks Mr. Ayoob for getting me to like the much maligned P90 and P345. While they never were first place. They sure weren't last place. So stayed tuned. A nice detailed look at the P90 and P345 will be coming soon.
 
Had a P89 for a while. Didn't particularly love it, reliable, chunky and I wasn't particularly accurate with it's very spungy trigger.

Friend had a 345 I did like quite a bit, he never would let me buy it off of him.
 
Interesting, I never had a Ruger P-series .45 though most of what I read about them was positive. I do have an old .40 flavored P94. If it was decock only instead of having the slide mounted safety I might carry it. I just really don't like the slide mounted safety. I remember stumbling across a P345 in a gun store after it had been out for a while. I really liked how it felt in my hand. Then I did some research on it & decided not to buy for the same reason I never bought any of the Ruger SR series. The fact the pistol had a magazine disconnect safety wasn't what turned me off. The fact that you could render the pistol inoperable if you dry fired without a magazine in place was.
 
Great write up. I had 2 P90s in the past (separated by some years). I like them. They work no matter what in my experience. Big, clunky and top heavy with a trigger that rivals a staple gun.........But fine pistols for the intended market and purpose.

My wife had a P95 polymer 9MM and that gun was awesome. Super accurate and easy to shoot well.
 
upload_2020-12-26_9-2-31.jpeg
Nice article. The limited availability in the U.K caught my attention. I am guessing handguns were much easier to buy back in the good ole 80’s. I always wanted a P85.
 
I've owned the P90 and the P345. Both were good, reliable, and accurate. I've rarely ever seen a P97 around here and, when I did, it was really over priced.
If I was getting one today, the old school feel and design of the P90 would be my choice.
 
One of my friends had a P90 back in 1998 or so. I remember that there was one unusual foible about field stripping it, but all these years later I can't remember exactly what it was. Something involving pressing a lever down inside the frame to release the slide. My buddy got it wrong and locked up the pistol so bad he had to send it back to Ruger. Anybody know what happened?
 
Miami....Thanks for the well done recap of Rugers P series. It validated my opinions and experiences with the P89 and 90 I once owned. Both went to friends when I decided to eliminate a caliber with the agreement that if they ever came back on the market I’d have first rights of refusal.
 
One of my friends had a P90 back in 1998 or so. I remember that there was one unusual foible about field stripping it, but all these years later I can't remember exactly what it was. Something involving pressing a lever down inside the frame to release the slide. My buddy got it wrong and locked up the pistol so bad he had to send it back to Ruger. Anybody know what happened?

I don't have a P90 but on my old P94 you lock the slide back, push the ejector down (you will hear a click & it will stay down), then release the slide stop & align the marks on the frame & slide. While holding the marks lined up you push the slide stop out from the other side. Once you have done this the slide slides off the frame rails. I think the P90 may not have marks but just some holes you need to line up. After reassembly when you insert a magazine it pushes the ejector back up.
 
While I've never owned one, I was always attracted to the P90, and especially the P345, the P97 not so much.

Congratulations on your finds.
The P97 was lighter, cheaper to make, and shipped from the factory with 8rd mags now instead of the older 7rd mags. Best of all, the newer mags could be used in the older P90.
Wasn't the only difference between the 7 round and 8 round mags the use of the Devel follower (as used in the Chip McCormick line-up of 1911 mags) in the 8 rounders?

An interesting tidbit on the Devel follower is it is typically not recommended for 1911's with aluminum frames since the follower can jump forward after the last round and out of the tube and ding aluminum frames. The Ruger P-Series were either aluminum framed or polymer framed, so the follower would ding the Ruger frames, but since they had integral barrel ramps the ding was on the frame and really just a cosmetic issue, and not much of one since you couldn't see it unless the gun was disassembled.
 
Antonio Banderas carrying twin Ruger P90's in the 1995 movie Desperado probably helped keep the P90 alive for a while too. The violence is quite graphic so I won't post a link, but if you haven't seen the movie there are short clips of some of the scenes available on Youtube if you want to look.

Over the years I've owned most of the P series variants in 9mm and 45. I don't think I ever owned one in 40 S&W. They were all rugged reliable guns and accurate enough, if not pretty crudely executed. If they'd had better triggers they would have been more accurate.

I really wanted to like the P345. It's fatal flaw was the wonky magazine disconnect they used to be legal in certain states that required them. I'm not opposed to mag disconnects if done right, but the Ruger design is different. With most of them the gun simply won't fire with the magazine removed. The Ruger will allow the trigger to be pulled and the hammer will drop, but there is a firing pin block that activates when the magazine is removed.

If you dry fire these guns with no magazine in them it only takes a very few times to damage the firing pin block. When that happens the gun will no longer fire. And it only takes a handful of times do do the damage, ask me how I know?. Ruger wasn't even aware of the flaw until guns started being returned.

The original owners manuals encouraged dry firing and didn't address whether the mag needed to be in the gun or not. After the issue came became known new owners manuals were printed with a warning stating that dry fire was OK, but you had to insert an empty magazine to prevent damage. When mine was returned from the factory after being repaired it came with the new owners manual.
 
I’ve always thought the P series were a good fit for the “house gun” role. Heavy but it didn’t need to be carried because it sat in a drawer. Reliable and inexpensive so the Everyman or woman could afford protection.

The P89 I once had was the most reliable gun I have ever owned. You never needed to clean it.....ever. It just worked.

More recently, the concept of the house gun has seemingly become taboo among defense enthusiasts but for average folk it is the best they know.
 
I picked up a then-new KP90DC, which was the model with the stainless slide and the spring-loaded decock-only option. I had trouble with the hammer causing a galling problem with the pickup rail on the bottom of the slide, "rolling up" some slide material as the hammer rubbed along the rail. I sent the gun back to Ruger. They returned it with a new slide, and a note explaining it had been an unrecognized heat treat issue with the original slide.

I shot the dickens out of that gun over the years. The extractor lost tension at one point; the mag catch button broke apart; the firing pin acquired some peening, I began getting a lot of brass ejected back into my face. I called back to the Prescott plant and spoke with a couple folks, and eventually received some replacement parts. New extractors (pre-tensioned) and FP's, replacement mag catch and a couple of guide rods (excessive wear on the original one). I also received some new recoil springs, since the company had bumped up the weight compared to the original one.

I also got a couple of the 8rd mags (from the P97) that had the folded leaf-spring follower and the shortened mag springs, as well as the added pressed dimples on each side of the mag lips. I was told those dimples were to help hold the top round under the lips during recoil, especially with the +P loads that some owners were using. I didn't care for the way the folded follower could slip forward and kiss the frame, so I rounded the front profile of the followers ... and then I eventually replaced them with the old-style followers and springs, making them 7rd mags. Call me old fashioned when it comes to .45's.

At one point during my conversations with the nice folks at the company, one of the guys asked how many rounds I'd fired through my P90, to cause so much wear. When I told him he just chuckled and said that it was probably time to buy another one, since I'd gotten my money's worth out of the first one.

I still have the old P90, and it still sees some range time now and again. It's a big ugly, hefty, chunky and ungainly clunker, but it works. I also have something like 20+ magazines for it, and a supply of spare parts, so I anticipate keeping it running for the rest of my shooting years. I prefer to carry smaller and lighter .45's, so I'm not putting an exhaustive number of rounds through it anymore. I used to consider it to be a "toolbox strong" shooter, like the original Security-Six line I enjoyed collecting and shooting in my younger days as an enthusiastic reloader.

It's still Ruger reliable, and it feeds and fires the assortment of .45 JHP's I've used over the years. More than sufficiently practically accurate, and the TDA (DA/SA) trigger is good enough for government work. The small 3-dot sights are practical enough, but I kinda wish I'd taken the time to find a suitable replacement for them many years ago.

I lamented the passing the aluminum- framed P-series pistols. Especially the P90.

I didn't care for the P97 I first handled and tried on our range, and picking up the P345 when it was released instantly informed me I didn't care to buy one to try. There's plenty of plastic when it comes to plastic .45's.
 
Not a .45, but I had a P89 in 9 for a while, inherited from my father. Loved it till I tried a number of other 9s. Mine was plenty accurate, but I didn’t care for the grip and trigger. Fun, easy gun to shoot though. Kind of wish I held onto it.

F5CD4E5E-1285-4D45-9AF8-129AFE683183.jpeg
 
Last edited:
When the NYPD was in the process of going to the 9MM, the Ruger P90 (maybe P89) was in the pilot program. I worked with 2 cops who were chosen and carried them. They liked them, I recall.

the contract went to the Glock 19,
Sig 226 DAO, and Smith 5946. Within a year, the Glocks began to have serious issues. Google NYPD Glock Phase 3 Malfunction for details. Glock wouldn’t deal with it so the job contacted Ruger to replace all Glocks in service. That got their attention. Losing a huge contract like that. They fixed the issue and the Rugers never replaced them.

I handled one a few months ago. I like Ruger guns and I’m sure they’re dependable but that thing was clunky, awkward, with sharp and unfinished edges. I think the shop wanted $350 for it but I wasn’t buying it.
 
I have owned every P Series 45 ACP .. my favorite was the P97 .. The last one I had a buddy at work aggravated my eyes out .. until I sold it to him .. thats been 8 years ago and he still has it ... his EDC
Hopefully I will be able to carry a semi auto again sooner than later .. I already have a P97 spotted
 
I have a P90 and have found it 100% reliable and extremely accurate. I usually carry it with the Hornady 230 gr XTP +P loading. Excellent weapon for OWB use.

One glaring discrepancy in your excellent post- the Glock 21 definitely does NOT "outclass" the P90.
 
Never cared all that much for any of the Ruger P Series semi-autos. I thought they were too big and felt cumbersome and unwieldy with just so ergonomics. Overall build quality and fit and finish were like industrial strength and along with a heavy, unrefined trigger; they just seemed to be lacking in refinement. The P345 was a big improvement as far as being an upgrade over previous P models with better design features and ergonomics but it still wasn't going to replace any of my 1911s. What it did do though was to open the door when I was looking for a compact 9mm. and by chance was turned on to the SR9c...

I was at the range one day and happened to notice the fellow next to me was shooting a new SR9c, right out of the box. I also noticed his target and saw he wasn't having much success in getting any sort of groups on target. During a break in shooting he came over and asked me if I would try out his gun so he could see if it the problem was him or the gun. I loaded up 5 rounds and proceeded to place all 5 shots in the black. Didn't say a word to him, I just handed him back his gun and made a mental note to check out the SR9c when I had a chance. I was really impressed with how good the gun felt in my hand, how it pointed so naturally for me, and for how easy the sights came up on target. The best part was the trigger which was very clean with a short reset; really great to find in a striker fired gun. Finally I have found true happiness with a Ruger semi-auto!
6qvaE77.jpg
 
I’ve always thought the P series were a good fit for the “house gun” role. Heavy but it didn’t need to be carried because it sat in a drawer. Reliable and inexpensive so the Everyman or woman could afford protection.

The P89 I once had was the most reliable gun I have ever owned. You never needed to clean it.....ever. It just worked.

More recently, the concept of the house gun has seemingly become taboo among defense enthusiasts but for average folk it is the best they know.

I still have one P-89 that I keep just for that reasoning. They just work no matter what, and make a great house gun. Only bought it because the great mag ban, so I wanted one double stack. Wife is super recoil sensitive and she can and will shoot it. Since it works so damn well it became a gun at home for her. Years after I bought it Midway had a load of those CRAP USA mags for it in 15 and 20 round. So cheap I bought a few of each and shocking to me even they work. The 20 rounders are so poorly made they are kind of hard to seat but the pistol just will not choke even with them. Wife finally moved up to an American in 9 for her bedside the bed gun so it could have a light / laser but, still just cant part with that old 89. The "P-Series" trigger all of them have took some getting used to but for me is no problem. Many hated them first time out but most with a little use can soon forget about them. I did have to laugh a while back when I got back from shooting the 89 again. Had not been cleaned in years so I did. Almost had to look up the manual as I was having a hard time getting it back together. It had been so damn long :D
 
Last edited:
I think they're okay. I somehow lucked into a P90 a few years ago for something like $150 plus shipping and FFL. The trigger isn't great, but it goes bang every time and I can shoot it as accurately as most service pistols.

I liked it enough to keep my eyes open for 9mm and 40 caliber P-series pistols, too, and found one of each inexpensively.

They aren't as "refined" as my Sigs and Walthers and so forth, but they're dependable and fit my large hands well.

View media item 1446
View media item 1943
View media item 1727
 
My P345 was one of those...”I can’t believe it shoots so well” guns. I had one of the first non-railed runs. I should have never sold it.
 
I don't remember if I posted this or not.
Excellent piece.
Doing very well with their Security/Speed Six line of revolvers.
View attachment 965296
Isn't supposed to be like a GP 100 ? why does it have a coil spring>
The Wisconsin State Patrol adopted the updated model
holy grail Ruger right there, my man. Find one of these, and we may visit your planet
But S&W, Beretts, Sig, and Glock beat them. Glock for their hyper aggressive marketing and practicality giving their guns away.
But that was the 9mm guns.

Ruger was originally developing a 10mm Auto version of the P89



Weighing in at 34oz and coming from the factory with two 7rd magazines.
YUCK on that.

Prototype of 10mm p89 = grail gun for the "kick me" crowd

The Massad photo with the p on his hip almost makes the whole 90s worth it
 
Last edited:
Had a P345 for a short while but never bonded to it. Didn't like grip ergonomics which felt too square and I couldn't get it to group to my liking with anything I fed it. Traded it towards a Sig P220 (folded carbon steel slide version) and on its first outing it tore a ragged hole in the target with my go-to SWC handload and fit my hand like a glove. However I know many do indeed like the Ruger autos and they are an interesting variation on the usual theme.
 
Again, killer writeup.

And now it's time to take up my cross against all you golldurn gunsnobs!

I've got HUNDREDS of youtube commenters backing me up here guys, all saying almost the exact same thing as me (and all telling the Lord's honest truth):

"P89 was the first gun I ever bought. I got it for $300 in 1992 at a gun show.

I never cleaned it during the eleven years I owned it, I never had a malfunction of any kind, and I never found out what recoil was until I sold it and moved up to a Glock.

I wish I had never gotten rid of that p89."

check any p89 youtube vid for plenty o examples
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top