Honestly I really enjoy talking to Steyr diehards.
Are you referring to me? I'd hardly consider myself a die hard. I do own one and I have been very happy with it. I also own sigs, colts, rugers, glocks, and a number of others. Based on my experience with all of the above I would buy another steyr. Is that what makes me a die hard or is it simply the fact I do not concur with all of your opinions?
You are one 100% that you do not need more than 1 or 2 good holsters but you do need more than 1 or 2 choices for those good holsters.
That would only be true if those 1 or 2 choices didn't fill one's needs for some reason. They may or may not. The vast majority of my holsters and mag pouches (particularly the ones that really get used) is from two companies that I've been happy with.
Can you name 6 companies selling non generic Steyr Holsters? Off the top of my head I can only think of High Noon & Kramer for S line only.
Just off the top of my head, FIST, Raven Concealment Systems, Fobus, Galaco, the nylon number on Steyr's website, Cross breed, and likely all of the makers of custom holsters. Perhaps there are more but those are the one's I can think of having seen off the top of my head.
You are right the HS2000 did not sell well when it was brought to market but what it did have when it became the XD is a real marketing company. Springfield is nothing but a marketing company. Steyr has a piss poor record here in the US.
I mostly agree. As I stated if they do more of the same then I'd imagine their results will be more of the same. Whether or not they will take a different approach is not something I have knowledge concerning. My point is not that steyr is SA. Or that the HS2000 means that the M series will succeed rather my point is simply that marketing is a bigger factor than the quality of the product.
The other part you are missing is that price drove the success of other polymers.
I'm not missing that at all. If the choice is between a G19 and a perhaps slightly better steyr for a few hundred more the steyr will be a tough sale. I think steyr intially saw them selves as a competitor for HK but lacked the HK brand to sell a polymer framed gun for $600+. I concur that price point will be a key factor in pushing a product in crowded field, particularly when one lack brand recognition. I think steyr could be successful. I think it is fair to say they have some hurdles. They may not be able to overcome them. I don't see them supplanting glock but being economically viable does not require having the largest market share per se. You mentioned Kahr I'd venture that they have a relatively small market share compared to XDs M&Ps and glocks.
They have not been able to market the AUG which at one time was the best of it kind. Comparing SA to Steyr is comparing a High School basketball team to the Miami Heat. One is world class the other is a bunch of kids.
I'd agree steyr is not on par with springfield for pushing new products. The same way kel tec isn't with ruger. You'll note that I noted commercial success takes more than a good design.
Their future success really is neither here nor there for me in terms of buying a used $350 gun today. One can get mags, springs, etc.
If I had a major failure on a pistol I paid $350 I might well just buy a new pistol. Like a number of guns out there etc. I do not think frame failures are particularly prevalent, I must admit yours is the only one I've heard of with a steyr. The outside chance of a frame failure would not cause me to not buy a gun I wanted, particularly a really inexpensive one. Had I been the one to experience that I might feel differently I suppose.
They do not even have . . . barrels to replace the major parts.
It took me all of 15 second online to find a .357 sig barrel in case the OP is truly worried about that.
http://www.steyrarms.com/store/index.php/accessories/steyr-m-series-pistol-357sig-barrel.html