cameramonkey
Member
I've been looking at 1911's again. It seems like there is alot of confusion regarding their quality (especially regarding MIM parts) and the modernization of their (re)design (external extractor, full length guide rods, etc.). I'm not really into competition shooting (not yet anyway - I did just get my G19 and plan on trying my hand at IDPA), but I like all of my guns to be suitable for defensive scenarios as well. Bottom line is I like them to function with hollow points and be able to stand up to the hardships a duty gun would require. The design which seem to have caught my eye that seem like they'd be good defensive 1911's are:
1. S&W 1911
2. Springfield Mil-Spec
3. Springfield's new MC Operator http://www.springfield-armory.com/images/pistols/PX9105MLLarge.jpg
4. Kimber's newly announced Warrior model http://www.defensereview.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=559
Of course all of these suffer from MIM and modern design alterations, but they seem like they serve as good defensive guns. I know it may sound crazy, but I really kinda like the S&W 1911. I was just wondering what advice/experience anyone could give regarding this 1911. The only thing that I don't like about it is the full length guide rod, but most reviews seem to be favorable regarding this gun.
1. S&W 1911
2. Springfield Mil-Spec
3. Springfield's new MC Operator http://www.springfield-armory.com/images/pistols/PX9105MLLarge.jpg
4. Kimber's newly announced Warrior model http://www.defensereview.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=559
Of course all of these suffer from MIM and modern design alterations, but they seem like they serve as good defensive guns. I know it may sound crazy, but I really kinda like the S&W 1911. I was just wondering what advice/experience anyone could give regarding this 1911. The only thing that I don't like about it is the full length guide rod, but most reviews seem to be favorable regarding this gun.