P220 vs P220ST showdown...review with pics.

Status
Not open for further replies.

agony

Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
539
Location
WV
Well I did a recent dueling 220's review at the range this weekend. Posted earlier on SIGforum. Pretty interesting turnout. I often wondered if the heft of the ST added to accuracy.

THE CONTENDERS:

SIG P220-American... blued with stamped slide, 91 date-code, aluminum framed, all german marks, SIGlites, old-school checkered grips. No modifications.

SIG P220ST, with standard stainless finish, Von Stagenhagen sights, old-school propriety accessory rail, mounted adapter and M3 light, stippled grips replaced the standard factory rubber Hogues.

THE AMMUNITION:


I wanted to check my fave handload against a factory load of Remington 185gr JHP.

I also used a tried and true handload recipe.
185gr Remington JSWC Match bullets atop once-fired PMP brass, 4.5gr of Bullseye, OAL=1.164", CCI standard large pistol primers. Clocks at ~780fps. Loaded on a Dillon 550. Cases cleaned prior to loading. Light crimp. No trimming or case-weighing performed.
fc7e39ee.jpg

(Oh, included is a little promo for my little brothers band, STRANGEWAY . If you're in the Pittsburgh area, check 'em out!!!)


THE RANGE:

The local gunclub, on a sunny breezy day, 60 degrees. No onlookers or shooting buddies.


INITIAL IMPRESSIONS:

I've owned this standard 220 for a little less than 5 months. It was apparently a police trade-in that someone ordered but never picked up. The dealer sold it to me for less than 400 bucks. The pistol looks worn on the outside from holstering. The internals are flawless. The pistol needed a little sight adjustment initially and Steve the P-220 man was kind enough to let me borrow his pusher. It has the older non-rebounding hammer which is more sharply spurred than the newer 220. The trigger is delectibly smooth. I've personally put about 1000 rounds through it...don't know how many were through it originally.


The 220ST-1 has been in my possession since September of last year. I traded for it, NIB. Some folks here consider it the pinnacle of classic SIG pistols. I personally love this pistol and it's proven to be more accurate than most of my 45s. I have finally mastered it, I think, and it will outshoot my HK USPs. With the light and adapter mounted, the switch for the M3 is a bit too low. This pistol hiccuped at first with extraction and slide-hold open problems, but after a couple thousand rounds, it has ran like a champ.

RESULTS:
I fired 5 round groups freehand from 10 yards for the enclosed pics. Using the modified Weaver, and a two-eyes open technique. Slow fire, all mags loaded with 5 rounds.


Here's the best I could muster with the Remington factory (Sorry, no pics of the factory ammo as I shot it all before I could take pics)....

The P220ST:
It measured 1" from center-to-center.
fc7e39cf.jpg


The 220 American:
It measured 1 3/8" center-to-center.
fc7e39db.jpg



The handloads of course, proved more accurate. Here are the best results:

The P220ST:
This group measured 3/4".
fc7e39c3.jpg


The P220-American:
This group measured 1 3/8"...the same as factory!
fc7e39e6.jpg


CONCLUSION:

The hands-down winner was the P220ST.
fc7e39b1.jpg

I feel the extra heft and the tighter slide-to-frame tolerences provide a more consistent and accurate shooting experience. Follow up shots are much quicker than with the American, and recoil with the relatively mild loads are similar to shooting 9mm out of a P226.

Not to say that the P220 is obsolete compared to the 220ST. The 220 conceals and carries much easier. Either way, you cannot lose. If you've never fired the original SIG classic P-series .45, please do so soon! You will not regret your experiences.

Thanks for letting me share.
 
I've been curious about how the heft of the ST aids in accuracy. Thanks for the report. I'd also be curious to find out if one is more durable than the other.

Oh, how do traditional SIG owners feel about the stainless versions of the 220 the the 226? Is it an improvement on the original classic, or is it blasphemous esp w/ the acc. rail?
 
Having shot a P220 and being pleased with the experience, it seems as though a model in stainless steel would be particularly exciting... but all the 220ST that I have seen sport those fugly rail cuts.

Any non-cut 220STs floating around?
 
Bergeron,

I believe SIG produced all stainless P220's called the P220 SL that lacks the rails but it is only intended for the European market. Your chances for one here Stateside is slim, very slim. After you shoot a P220ST take a look at the rails and see if you still care. That's how you'll know for sure :D

10-Ring,

I don't know what it is about the P220ST but the thing just has major mojo. I didn't think any other .45 could be as soft shooting as my Glock 21 but the recoil on the P220ST literally feels like I'm shooting a SIG P228 9mm. As far as accuracy it is the most accurate .45 pistol I've ever shot. The whole pistol is constructed like one solid piece of steel. Work the slide on a P220ST thats been broken in. Its silky smooth with no hesitation. The Beretta 92FS has nothing over the P220ST in this area. I've handled a lot of different SIGs and the P220ST is just on a different plane. The pistol hasn't been around long enough to gauge how durable it really is. Probably not as durable as a carbon steel 1911. But few things are. ;) The P220ST probably is a lot more durable than a standard P220. The steel slide over thousands and thousands of rounds can wreak havoc on the softer aluminum rails. And the aluminum frame, as tough as it is, isn't going to be as tough as no stainless steel. But if you got enough money to shoot a P220 to the ground you probably got enough money for another one. And look at Ala Dan. He's a real shooter and he's had his P220 since like "forever":neener:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top