Pelosi To Assassinate Free Speech

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Mar 15, 2006
Messages
3,230
Location
Oklahoma
If you thought the McCain-Feingold Atrocity was bad, look at what Nancy Pelosi has in store for us.

Pelosi To Assassinate Free Speech and to require a three day waiting period at gun shows.

Who among us has any doubt we are being set up for dictatorship, and that our rights - all of them - are being eroded, abridged, and infringed to that end? This smacks of Fascism, Totalitarianism, with a sprinkling of Nazism thrown in for good measure. It's as if she and her willing accomplices in Congress and their backers have chosen the worse aspect of those three(and maybe other) despotic forms of government and rolled them into one hideous doctrine of their own for their own self aggrandizement and tenure in office.

This cannot be allowed, my friends. This is antithetical to the very existence of this great nation of ours, our freedom, and the rights that keep it all ours.

Woody

Litany of blue, profane, derogatory, and truly felt emotions withheld for the protection of our children and the tender of ear.
 
Well, I'm already voting against her in every way I can.

Could she be reached for comment? We might try a botox clinic in San Fransisco for repeat offenders.

Honestly, I'm not too worried about that one, at least not now. Everyone understands now that McCain-Feingold was a joke designed around people who wanted to use its exceptions. The dems don't want to do a lot of boat-rocking for the next two years, they want to bring calm to the storm, they don't want people thinking about controversial legislation in '08.
 
Pelosi To Assassinate Free Speech and to require a three day waiting period at gun shows.

She's engaged in the same partisan bickering that the Republicans were in control of the past few years. So they're politicians, all of them. You expected differently?

And please cite your source for the three-day waiting period. I see no mention of that in the article or anywhere else.

Can you provide a source?
 
"Free speech" ? What is that?

It seems to me that McCain-Feingold started to nail the coffin lid on, anything the Pelosi does can be likened to shovelling the dirt into the grave.
 
Just as Pelosi plans four days of celebration around her Jan. 4 swearing-in as the first female speaker of the House

Is that with tax money or private money?

:mad:
 
"supported a bill requiring a 72-hour background check for persons buying weapons at gun shows "
 
Since most gun shows are Saturday and Sunday affairs and consume much less than 72 hours. This will effectively kill gun shows if it happens. Ah the joys of Democrat leadership. :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :cuss:
 
Could she be reached for comment? We might try a botox clinic in San Fransisco for repeat offenders.
Now now. This is the High Road, so we won't point out there is more plastic in her face than in a Glock 21 either. :evil:

Clearly we are going to have to hope the nefarious plans of the anti gun Democrat leadership will be stopped by Republican fillibusters in the Senate.
 
For some reason, an episode of the Simpsons flashed through my mind when I read this.

"I am being attacked by Communist Nazis." - McBane Wolfcastle
 
And that's why the Dems Passed On Her

Well, that's why the Dems passed on Pelosi as a leader ... they want people like Pelosi to be pushing their change agenda onto America, while the figurehead Dems make speeches about how moderate they are.
 
Free speech?

That train left the station a long time ago. The first time I saw the "free speech zones" being set up as large cages outside the Repub and Dem conventions in about 2000 I knew that none of the current or future leaders cared about the First Amendment. And if the leader ship doesn't care about the BOR and most citizens don't care, the bureacracy works against it...then the only thing left is a few knotheads like me walking around like dinosaurs after the comet hit who can't figure out where everyone else has gone.
 
Hahaha, Newsmax.

just because it is one sided doesn't mean the news itself isnt valid, or that the facts are not true. . . no weapons, no mobilisation / speech, no organization, etc And don't forget that the repub's slammed through part one of all this stuff. Where are good men to lead the nation?
st
 
In California, there's a 10-day waiting period, and gun shows are alive and well.

Forgive me but I am doing all I can to keep Ohio from becoming anything closer to what California is than what we already are. The idea is unnecessary. We already have the instant check. A waiting period is cause more headaches, add expense for shipping and to discourage sales.
 
What do you expect from rabid communists?

There are at least 55% of America haters. Destroying a once great country must be a funny thing, until the destroyers sit on the ruins, whining "what happened to our country?"

Remember Michael Moore? His book "Where is My Country, Dude?"

Answer" "You and your ilk destroyed it, Mike"
 
I just pray the rest of America will be nausiated by what we here in California have been stomaching.
 
Well, look at the bright side. You want to know when the stuff hits the fan? When THR is off the air and so are a lot of the talk radio people, felled by "The Fairness Doctrine" and whatever new atrocities they can get away with. You will know The Terror has begun and the fun & games are over.
 
reply

How come that people tell me again, and again, and again, that we are a FREE country?

Which that people? erm...I digress.

Because we have the right to keep and bear arms.

Because we can rock out, or mellow jazz, our way into downtown to remind ourselves why we live in the sticks. :D

Because I am not arrested for going to my little church, or not.

Because a black man can sit next to a white, and be served first if he was there first.

Only my native brothers still experience oppression on a deep and profound level it seems. (Hopi in particular)

And even though we are messed up, we are still on the bright side of the valley, the Sun won't eclipse us until our thoughts, speech, and weapons, are stolen by the power hungry and fearful.
 
# It makes changes to the legal definition of "grassroots lobbying" and requires any organization that encourages 500 or more members of the general public to contact their elected representatives to file a report with detailed information about their organization to the government on a quarterly basis.

# Such report (above) would require, among other things, the detailing of the organization's expenditures, the issues focused on and the members of Congress and other federal officials who are targeted. A separate report must address each policy issue the group is advocating.

This is the real objective of the bill to help cut down on organizations such as THR and the NRA, among many other groups. The other parts will definitly be worked around by the Democrats somehow. For example, instead of using a corporate jet, they will charter an airliner. Just watch. The parts about disclosing who wants the earmarked spending and such won't matter- because the general public does not pay attention to such matters...

Wait for a resurrection of the Fairness Doctrine to kill off what's left of Talk Radio and other alternative media sources...

Bad JuJu ahead...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top