peacemaker45
Member
Ok, I know how reliable information in glossy gun-rags usually is, but I think the phenomenon may have reached a new depth.
John Taffin, in the 2009 Special Edition of GUNS, wrote an article about the .45-70, singing it's praises. While I'm as much a fan of the .45-70 as anyone, he did make one statement that seems to defy the laws of physics. He said that the .45-70, using a 500 grn bullet, at 1,500 fps will out penetrate a .458 Win Mag, using a 500 grn bullet, at 2,100 fps. Using a test medium of wet newspaper, the .458 penetrated 4.5 feet, and the .45-70 six feet.
This doesn't seem to make sense. Only thing I can figure is that the test was rigged, and he's very carefully not saying so. He did not say that the two guns used the same 500 grainer.
Any info, data, or opinions?
John Taffin, in the 2009 Special Edition of GUNS, wrote an article about the .45-70, singing it's praises. While I'm as much a fan of the .45-70 as anyone, he did make one statement that seems to defy the laws of physics. He said that the .45-70, using a 500 grn bullet, at 1,500 fps will out penetrate a .458 Win Mag, using a 500 grn bullet, at 2,100 fps. Using a test medium of wet newspaper, the .458 penetrated 4.5 feet, and the .45-70 six feet.
This doesn't seem to make sense. Only thing I can figure is that the test was rigged, and he's very carefully not saying so. He did not say that the two guns used the same 500 grainer.
Any info, data, or opinions?