Jim Watson
Member
If you commit the horrible social blunder of calling a detachable magazine a "clip" you will soon be corrected. But there are other misuses that do not attract the attention of the newsstand ballisticians.
Load your magazine with bullets, fine.
Load each of your revolver's cylinders with them, no problem.
To quote Nero Wolfe, phooey.
And the latest to go over critical mass on my terminology scale; shoot your AR15, M1, Anschutz, etc. with "open sights." It has become widely accepted that if a firearm does not have a telescopic sight, then it has "open sights." We used to distinguish between open sights and peep sights. Called them aperture sights when we wanted to be explicit and expert. Or diopter sights if we wanted to sound Continental. But now even a lot of match shooters call their expensive and precise aperture sights (front and rear) "open sights."
Another battle lost?
Load your magazine with bullets, fine.
Load each of your revolver's cylinders with them, no problem.
To quote Nero Wolfe, phooey.
And the latest to go over critical mass on my terminology scale; shoot your AR15, M1, Anschutz, etc. with "open sights." It has become widely accepted that if a firearm does not have a telescopic sight, then it has "open sights." We used to distinguish between open sights and peep sights. Called them aperture sights when we wanted to be explicit and expert. Or diopter sights if we wanted to sound Continental. But now even a lot of match shooters call their expensive and precise aperture sights (front and rear) "open sights."
Another battle lost?