Photos of the insides of an old S&W

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Dec 18, 2011
Messages
6,451
Location
Land of the Pilgrims
Howdy

I'm pretty new here. Yesterday I was looking at Sylvan-Forge's excellent post about disassembly, inspection, select repairs and reassembly of a S&W Model 10 for the first time. When I saw the first photos of the hammer I said holy moley, what's up with that hammer? Then I realized that I had never seen a MIM (Metal Injection Molding) hammer before.

When ever I buy an old S&W I like to take the side plate off and see what's inside. Often there will be years worth of gunk and hardened oil. Just cleaning out all that stuff can result in a gun that is smoother and has a better action without doing anything else. So in the interest of showing some slightly different parts, here are some photos I took while I was cleaning a S&W 38/44 Heavy Duty made in 1930.

First, here is one of Sylvan-Forge's photos for comparison. I hope he does not mind me reproducing his photo here.


m10c-137.jpg



Here is a view of the disassembled revolver. I have to say at this point that my hat is off to Sylvan-Forge. I never disassemble the cylinder of a Smith unless I absolutely have to.

disassembled.jpg



Here is a closeup of the machining inside the frame. It is interesting to note that the frames of guns from this era were made long before CNC milling equipment existed. Parts like this were machined on pattern following equipment. The machine operator manipulated handles that kept a guide against a pattern to cut the complex curves inside the frame. That's why the machining marks look a bit irregular. Even with a skilled operator the feed rate of the cutter varied and this shows in the cutter marks left behind. It is also interesting to note that some blueing has rubbed off where the rebound slide moves back and forth.


framemachinging-1.jpg



This gun has the pre-WWII type hammer block. The hammer block is made from a piece of spring steel. It is peened in place into the side plate. The hammer block is normally in position to block the hammer. There is a ramp built onto the hand that engages a tab on the side of the hammer block. Arrows point to these two features. As the hand rises, the ramp wedges the tab on the hammer block over, withdrawing the hammer block and allowing the hammer to fall all the way forward.

triggerandsideplatewitharrows.jpg


Here is the gun, all cleaned out and relubed, ready to be buttoned up. If you look closely you can see there is no pin on the rebound slide for the modern style of hammer block.

reassembled.jpg


Here is another view of the action, ready to be sealed up.

reassembled02.jpg


Here is the gun all put back together. Sorry about the grips, they are incorrect but they are what came on it. Incidentally, I just got this gun lettered. It has an interesting history.

It shipped September 10, 1930, delivered to an employee of S&W. This revolver was one of a group of revolvers that was taken to The National Pistol Championship, Camp Perry Ohio in the summer of 1930. This revolver was sold at Camp Perry to a Lieutenant in the Army.

38-44HeavyDuty02.jpg


I really like working on these old Five Screws better than the Three Screws. For one thing, it is much easier to replace the cylinder stop and its spring in a Five Screw. The spring and its plunger have their own hole in front of the trigger guard. First you put the stop back in, then you pop the plunger and screw into their hole and cover it with the screw. Much easier than trying to get the spring in while replacing the stop, without mashing the spring or sending it across the room. And of course, there is no lock to worry about, and the firing pin is on the hammer, where it is supposed to be, but that's beside the point.

If you want to try taking apart a Smith, I admit it can be really scary the first time. I cannot recommend Jerry Kuhnhausen's book The S&W Revolver A Shop Manual highly enough. Use it the first few times, and eventually you will be confident enough to take one apart without the book in front of you. But don't keep the book too far away.

P.S. Just so you don't think I'm too much of a snob, I do have a 617 that I bought used last year. It does have MIM parts and the lock in it. I guess I ought to take it apart now to see how different it is.
 
Last edited:
Good stuff. Thanks for posting.

Interesting about the hammer block. Seems like it'd add something to the trigger pull. Maybe that's why they redesigned it?

The attachment of the sear to the hammer is certainly different than MIM, but different from earlier forged versions as well. Your photo's a good reference.

If you want to try taking apart a Smith, I admit it can be really scary the first time. I cannot recommend Jerry Kuhnhausen's book The S&W Revolver A Shop Manual highly enough. Use it the first few times, and eventually you will be confident enough to take one apart without the book in front of you. But don't keep the book too far away.

Agreed. Disassembly/reassembly is very straightforward. Do your homework (e.g. Kuhnhausen) beforehand, then go slow, be organized, and use the correct tools. Good lighting and some magnification are big helps, too.
 
The story I heard was that a Victory Model fell to the deck on a destroyer during WWII. Despite the fact that there was a trigger block in the gun, it discharged, killing a sailor. The Military told S&W that if they wanted to keep their contracts, they had to do something. S&W redesigned the hammer block to the current version in just a few days.

At least that is the way I heard it.
 
Quite a long time ago I took my 66-2 in to a smith to have the main spring replaced, and in addition to scratching the heck out of it, he warped the side plate because he didn't know how to properely seat it. I ended up having to flatten it out enough to function without binding and sold it. S&W said they didn't have a side plate for that one, I think it was a 10-5 if memory serves me correct. The moral to the story, don't let just any smith open up you piece without knowing first hand, that they know what they are doing.

After that experience and another really bad one I started doing all the work myself and have had absolutely no issues.

I noticed the pictures you provided didn't show the timing hand, spring, and trigger separated. Some of those require a spring block to reset the timing hand spring into the trigger. With exception to that portion of disassembly, anyone paying attention can easily take a S&W dowm for cleaning and maintance. I now disassemble all of mine for cleaning and lube every year, or after exposure to wet or dusty conditions.

BTW, those are some really great pictures!
 
Nice 38/44. For a Sep. 1930 gun I assume it has a fouling cup over the cylinder gap in the top strap?

Interesting that it has the wrong grips for a 1930 Heavy Duty. It should have Service grips instead of Magnas. Those look like Post War Magnas so they are probably a bit long if I remember right.

2-nice-3844s.jpg

The bottom one is an April 1930 factory original. While the top is my "Mcgivern look alike" model 1940 target 38/44 Heavy Duty conversion for comparison.


prewar_hds.jpg

This is an older picture of my 38/44 HD's for comparison. I love the older ones myself.
 
Nice 38/44. For a Sep. 1930 gun I assume it has a fouling cup over the cylinder gap in the top strap?

Interesting that it has the wrong grips for a 1930 Heavy Duty. It should have Service grips instead of Magnas. Those look like Post War Magnas so they are probably a bit long if I remember right.

Yes, it has the relief cut in the underside of the top strap above the barrel/cylinder gap.

Those are the grips that came on it. I don't know exactly what era they are from, I just know they are incorrect. They do fit quite well, they do not overhang at all. Unfortunately, somebody has slopped an extra heavy layer of varnish of some sort over the grips, including slopping the varnish onto the checkering, practically filling up the grooves between the points.

It would be nice if it came with the correct service grips, but you know how grips tend to disappear over 80 years or so. I come across lots of old Smiths that have the wrong grips on them. I am always on the lookout for nice original service grips for earlier Smiths, but they are few and far between. I do have a set of grips I took off a 44 Hand Ejector 3rd Model that would probably fit. But I took them off because they were very badly worn. I don't want to put them on this gun. More likely I will either strip all the varnish off of these magnas, or I will find another pair of N frame Magnas to put on. I doubt if I will find any original old service grips for less than an arm and a leg.
 
Decent sets of Service grips are now in the 1 to 3 bills (up to $300) range now. Expensive and getting more so every day. I no longer collect them off the net as it is just too expensive. I now just hit the gun shows and occasionally find some Pre-War N frame grips to add to the wood pile.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top