Pistol packers challenge police

Status
Not open for further replies.

jsalcedo

Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2002
Messages
3,683
Pistol-packers challenge police
By ROGER TALBOT
Sunday News Staff
http://www.theunionleader.com/articles_showfast.html?article=62485


Police took Michael V. Pelletier’s loaded pistol while he browsed in a bookstore; David K. Ridley’s mistake was to change jackets in a mall parking lot, and Penny S. Dean’s encounter happened during a late-night constitutional on a city street.

Because the New Hampshire Constitution guarantees the right to bear arms — no license needed, unless the weapon is concealed — all three got their guns back within minutes, but the confrontations caused them unease.

“The bottom line is that this type of thing shouldn’t be happening in a state where (carrying a pistol) is perfectly allowed,” said Dean, a lawyer and consulting counsel to Gun Owners of New Hampshire, the gun-rights advocacy organization.

Dean, in a routine followed often in the 10 years she has lived on Warren Street in Concord, was taking a late-night walk on June 16. She was on Pleasant Street out by St. Paul School when state trooper Abbott Presby stopped his cruiser.

“He must have asked me six times for a driver’s license. Then he proceeded to ask what I was doing there and I kept asking him, ‘Are you detaining me?’” Dean said.

She didn’t have her driver’s license. She had a cellular phone, a credit card, her license to carry a concealed pistol and her Glock 23 in a nylon, neon-pink fanny pack.

Dean wrote a letter to state police Col. Frederick H. Booth citing her constitutional rights and complaining of her “detention” by Presby.

“Had I not vigorously, repeatedly and firmly asserted that I wanted to (be) released from this detention I could have been illegally held there indefinitely. I firmly believe that it was only after I explained to trooper Presby that I was an attorney that the impetus to release me awakened,” Dean wrote.

Three months later, state police Lt. Mark J. Myrdek responded, writing that a review of the incident had found Presby’s “actions and conduct were justified, lawful and proper.”

On March 27, 2004, at about 9:15 p.m., three police officers in uniform and two detectives in plain clothes converged on Michael Pelletier as he thumbed through a book at Barnes & Noble store in Manchester. Pelletier and his wife had marked their 11th anniversary with dinner, then gone to the bookstore, where his coat stayed in the car. He had forgotten the change in attire left visible the holstered Glock 30 pistol tucked into his belt at his back.

A shopper telephoned police.

Pelletier said the officers “basically grabbed me by the shoulder, disarmed me and took me out of the store. They ran my license and registration and the serial number on the gun and stood around lecturing me for 20 minutes. It was irritating, but at least I wasn’t arrested.

“What boggled my mind was that out of at least seven officers and dispatchers involved not one seemed to know that open carry is legal in New Hampshire and they basically treated this like they would a felony stop. . . . I wasn’t doing anything illegal. I was minding my own business and I think they could muster the ability to treat me with courtesy and respect in that situation,” said Pelletier, who lives in Merrimack and is a West Coast transplant drawn here by the Free State Project’s pick of New Hampshire in 2003 as the place to promote its minimal-government agenda.

Alan M. Rice of Brookline, the treasurer of the New Hampshire Firearms Coalition, has been dealing with gun use safety for 10 years. He is certified as an “instructor-trainer,” qualified to teach even the firearms instructors.

Commenting on what Pelletier has written on the Internet about his bookstore experience, Rice said, “I think he exercised extraordinarily poor judgment on that particular night (because) he had an open-top holster in the small of his back in an unconcealed fashion. . . .

“Most professionals do not carry a gun there because it’s hard to access the weapon and hard to retain the weapon if someone wants to take it away from you.”

Rice prefers holsters with retention features that thwart efforts to extract the handgun, and he advises students to place the belt holster at their right or left side, where it is protected by the arm.

As a firearms instructor, Rice views concealed-carry as “a good way to deter crime because they don’t know who is carrying.”

Though it is legal to carry a gun in plain view, “open-carry is not a bright idea,” Rice said. “You are a target. If someone comes in with criminal intent, the first thing he is going to do is neutralize any person with a weapon who can hurt him.”

Like Pelletier, David Ridley’s move to New Hampshire was inspired by the Free State Project. He came from Texas, which he described as having restrictive gun licensing laws.

“When you come to a place where the right is recognized by government and you’ve never had it before, it’s a right you want to celebrate. At the same time, if you don’t exercise the right, I think you will eventually lose it. So for me, open-carry is primarily a political thing,” said Ridley, who lives in Keene.

Ridley had changed jackets and was engrossed in lettering a placard on the hood of his car in a supermarket parking lot in Salem on March 21 when five police officers, responding to a citizen’s call, asked about the holstered Glock 19 on his hip.

“They said, ‘You alarmed a person who saw the gun.’

“When that is the situation, they have to respond to the call. I understand that, but what was wrong was when they started talking about arresting me when I hadn’t done anything illegal,” Ridley said.

In responding to a letter from Ridley, Salem Police Chief Paul T. Donovan wrote that his officers would continue to respond “with an open mind” when a complaint comes in about someone carrying a firearm.

“In this day and age where people have committed some very violent attacks using firearms, it is understandable that people who do not understand the values of law-abiding firearms owners run scared. We need to work at improving our image with those who don’t understand,” Donovan wrote.
 
But, we are supposed to trust the police. They walk the walk, and are professionals. Who am I to second guess?:cuss:
 
I remember this incident from some time ago... pelletier was carrying on his six dressed in slacks and shirt and tie and was accosted in a barnes and nobles here in manchester NH where I reside. I never had any problem with the local police when they found out I was armed, but apparently he experienced a much different scenario. I forget his handle on here, I think it was mvpel. if you do a search you can see the debate that ensued regarding this. a few overzealous LEO's accosting him for displaying a firearm in an open carry state... now I dont agree with carrying in a position where you can easily be stripped of your firearm, but the action that was taken was over the top imo... its not like he had jeans sagging to his ankles and was wearing a doo rag.

I believe he had intention to sue the city... anyone know what came of that? on a side note, a few days later a man had his dog shot to death by an off duty cop in the same city claiming it attacked him and his children, but the circumstances were pretty much a he said, he said thing.
 
[Though it is legal to carry a gun in plain view, “open-carry is not a bright idea,” Rice said. “You are a target. If someone comes in with criminal intent, the first thing he is going to do is neutralize any person with a weapon who can hurt him.”]

...

And they'll take your gun away from you.

Because they are villians with super powers. And laser beams on their heads.

FEER THE LASERHEADVILLIANS! GIVE US YOUR GUNS BEFORE THE LASERHEADVILLIANS COME FOR YOU!
 
“In this day and age where people have committed some very violent attacks using firearms, it is understandable that people who do not understand the values of law-abiding firearms owners run scared. We need to work at improving our image with those who don’t understand,” Donovan wrote.

Okay, I suggest training dispatchers to ask more specific questions about the person with the weapon and attempt to separate fact from perception. While the caller may feel threatened, the dispatcher needs to find out whether or not the caller actually was threatened. I would say to the caller, "carrying a firearm is legal in New Hampshire, whether openly or concealed. Is there anything else about this person's actions that would constitute a crime?"
 
Devonai said:
Okay, I suggest training dispatchers to ask more specific questions about the person with the weapon and attempt to separate fact from perception. While the caller may feel threatened, the dispatcher needs to find out whether or not the caller actually was threatened. I would say to the caller, "carrying a firearm is legal in New Hampshire, whether openly or concealed. Is there anything else about this person's actions that would constitute a crime?"

While I am about as Pro Gun as it gets and I believe every state should have open carry laws I am also a dispatcher - deciding if someone has commited a crime over the phone is not my job nor should it be. If someone "believes" themselves to be in danger I am not going to waste time by playing 20 questions with them....real or not that person believes there to be danger and its an officers job to show up and do his job - its not my place to do his job over the phone. The officer should have looked at the guy in his nice clothes browsing books and been very polite in his dealings with him - now if he would have had a ski mask on looking at Thug Gang Bangers Who Hold Their Gun Sideways Monthly then game on.......officers these days have a piss poor conception of discretion. The stories I could tell of officer out-right singling someone out and then bragging about it back at the station - makes me wanna blow chunks. Most are good guys but more and more are merely thugs themselfs.......somedays I wanna quit but you know what they say - keep your friends close and your enemies closer.
 
While I am about as Pro Gun as it gets and I believe every state should have open carry laws I am also a dispatcher - deciding if someone has commited a crime over the phone is not my job nor should it be.
Aaron,

I'm not trying to be sarcastic; this is a genuine question because I don't know how such things work.

If a citizen called in and reported, "I saw someone wearing a weird-looking hat," or "There's a guy here wearing a purple shirt," would you dispatch police based only on that? Or would you try to get more information? Or would you get more information while dispatching police?

What I'm getting at is, if somebody calls and reports something that is clearly not against the law, do you always send the police anyway? Do you any screening for them at all, on any other kind of report?

pax
 
Sarcasm? Oh, I'll get that one, pax.

Notice: I have called IPD (Internet Police Department) on you all for obeying the law.

As well, I have called the police in my city on: people walking down the street, people waiting for the bus, people sitting outside coffee shoppes drinking coffee (yes, drinking coffee! The horror!), and on the iron workers across the street working on the high rise office building going up.

All these people are obviously obeying the law [*shudder*]and the police should investigate at once as I believe I am in grave danger.
 
Hey, El Tejon - these people who were "obeying the law" . . . are you sure they weren't just exploiting a loophole? :rolleyes:
 
El T ~

No, it was an honest question. I don't know what the dispatcher's job is. Presumably they've got some sort of guidelines to work with.

I'm just wondering at what point in the process the brakes would kick in, and who would be responsible for applying them.

pax
 
The officers should have approached these people in a non-custodial way and simply asked for cooperation. IMO the officers used poor investigative and public relation techniques, I’ll leave it at that.
 
In our society any call with the word "gun" in it will get a police response.

Here in San Antonio it is perfectly legal for me to walk down the street with a fully loaded AK.

I will not get 4 steps before someone calls the cops and I get arrested for
"menacing" "brandishing" "disturbing the peace" etc...

So yes police respond to people obeying the law
 
aaronrkelly said:
While I am about as Pro Gun as it gets and I believe every state should have open carry laws I am also a dispatcher - deciding if someone has commited a crime over the phone is not my job nor should it be. If someone "believes" themselves to be in danger I am not going to waste time by playing 20 questions with them....real or not that person believes there to be danger and its an officers job to show up and do his job - its not my place to do his job over the phone. The officer should have looked at the guy in his nice clothes browsing books and been very polite in his dealings with him - now if he would have had a ski mask on looking at Thug Gang Bangers Who Hold Their Gun Sideways Monthly then game on.......officers these days have a piss poor conception of discretion. The stories I could tell of officer out-right singling someone out and then bragging about it back at the station - makes me wanna blow chunks. Most are good guys but more and more are merely thugs themselfs.......somedays I wanna quit but you know what they say - keep your friends close and your enemies closer.
Ok, I call you in a panicked voice explaining that I just saw a man on a ladder painting the trim on his house, and that I feel very threatened by this act. Do you immediately dispatch a squad car, or do you ask for more information first?
 
pax said:
Aaron,

I'm not trying to be sarcastic; this is a genuine question because I don't know how such things work.

If a citizen called in and reported, "I saw someone wearing a weird-looking hat," or "There's a guy here wearing a purple shirt," would you dispatch police based only on that? Or would you try to get more information? Or would you get more information while dispatching police?

What I'm getting at is, if somebody calls and reports something that is clearly not against the law, do you always send the police anyway? Do you any screening for them at all, on any other kind of report?

pax


Yes, if a citizen requests the police they will get them - even if what they are requesting isnt against the law. For one, Im a dispatcher - I got one week of training at the academy. A police officer knows the law, knows what is and isnt against the law and acts appropriately. I am not a police officer and I dont know the law. Even if I did my job is not to make such decisions. A dispatcher merely takes information and gives it to the most appropriate authority. Its not my job to decide what is and isnt worthy. For instance I got a call tonight from a parent that was having trouble with their daughter. That is not a crime but the police go down there and tell them that - I merely hand off the request, information or page to the correct agency be it fire, EMS or law.

From a liability stand point I am not going to decide when a person needs law enforcements presence over the phone - if you think you need help your going to get it. The officers can make the decisions when they get there.
 
aaronrkelly said:
officers these days have a piss poor conception of discretion. The stories I could tell of officer out-right singling someone out and then bragging about it back at the station - makes me wanna blow chunks. Most are good guys but more and more are merely thugs themselfs.

Why anyone would want to be a LEO and deal with the scum of the earth on a daily basis is beyond me, but thank G*d we have them. I'm glad you said that most are good guys because I'd like to believe they are. There are also bad lawyers, dentists, business people, teachers, etc.
 
HankB, I have opened a file on you, sir.:D You just keep up that law-abiding behavior and see where that gets you, young man!

pax, I know but the flow chart law enforcement that we have now drives me nuts--personally and professionally. I know it's nothing the dispatchers do, but shift command or the deputy chief or somebody should step in and say "No!"
 
jsalcedo said:
Pistol-packers challenge police
By ROGER TALBOT
Sunday News Staff
http://www.theunionleader.com/articles_showfast.html?article=62485


situation,” said Pelletier, who lives in Merrimack and is a West Coast transplant drawn here by the Free State Project’s pick of New Hampshire in 2003 as the place to promote its minimal-government agenda.
might be time to consider a new location for the free state project.
 
Aaron ~

Thanks. That makes sense.

So where this battle is going to be fought is either at the citizen level -- increasing awareness that merely carrying a gun isn't breaking the law -- or at the level of the local police, educating them about what the law actually says and convincing them to respond less aggressively in such cases.

Um, what kind of influence do you have on the type of police response? Do you, for instance, suggest multiple units? Or is that also entirely up to police discretion?

pax
 
If someone "believes" themselves to be in danger I am not going to waste time by playing 20 questions with them....real or not that person believes there to be danger and its an officers job to show up and do his job - its not my place to do his job over the phone.

As a dispatcher, it is your job to play 20 questions over the phone, and relay that info to the responding LEOs. And based on my (limited) experiance, dispatchers do a poor job of that.

Every time I or someone in my family has had to call 911 the dispatcher plays 20 questions, and as far I can tell, doesn't tell the officer a damned thing other than an adress and what might be happening.
 
pax said:
Aaron ~

Thanks. That makes sense.

So where this battle is going to be fought is either at the citizen level -- increasing awareness that merely carrying a gun isn't breaking the law -- or at the level of the local police, educating them about what the law actually says and convincing them to respond less aggressively in such cases.

Um, what kind of influence do you have on the type of police response? Do you, for instance, suggest multiple units? Or is that also entirely up to police discretion?

pax


In the case of "amount" of officers to send - I dispatch the call to the appropriate agency (either SO or PD) and the responding officer will tell me if he needs/wants more help - I go from there. I dont automatically call in more officers. Alot of dispatchers make their jobs more complicated then they are. All I do is take information and dispense it - I dont make any decisions because thats were you start making yourself liable. I do what people tell me to do and nothing more or less.

I have certain protocol that says if there is a chase, shooting etc that I am to phone the chief of police or sheriff and notify them of the situation - from there they make the decisions.
 
Zach S said:
As a dispatcher, it is your job to play 20 questions over the phone, and relay that info to the responding LEOs. And based on my (limited) experiance, dispatchers do a poor job of that.


True but read it in context - Im not going to play twenty questions before sending someone. If I heard there is a guy down here with a gun Im going to dispatch a guy with a gun then get more information while units are on the way. Im damn sure not going to ask if hes a concealed weapons carrier, is he threatening people with it, does he look like a criminal etc *before* alerting officers - the questions comes after dispatching the calls primary purpose. They can be half way across town before I even get to those questions........

Dispatch centers are setup differently so I cannot comment on your other comment.....most dispatch centers have 2 staff. One is a dispatcher and the others is a call taker. The call taker answers the phone, types the information into the system and the dispatcher reads off that screen to send the appropriate units. This is the most common setup for any but the smallest towns - in this setup you would not hear the dispatcher because they are atleast setting at another desk and possibly in another room entirely. All setups are different.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top