To me, “soul” is a combo of frame and grip that gives me a “soul or no soul” vibe. Since polymer framed guns don’t usually have grip panels, to me this pushes it more towards the steel framed guns.
The 1911 looks right with wood grip panels sitting on the alloy frame. It doesn’t necessarily have soul, but I think it looks good.
This 4013 is steel, alloy and plastic grips. This combo doesn’t really sing to me all that much.
Now these have soul, IMHO, even if they’re not first generation SAA’s. The shape, feel and materials of the Blackhawk/Vaquero combine to form guns that I find to be classic, and the two with the glossy walnut grips really pop.
These N frames are also classic, but IMHO the grips are a downer. The synthetic grips are for recoil control, as the .44 and .41 come with a kick thats a bit much for me with wooden grips.
On my Dan’s, the wooden grips go with lighter recoiling loads. The synthetic Hogues I prefer with magnums.
This Glock 34 wears a 5-color camo cerakote. I wouldn’t say that this gives it “soul”, but I do think it has a bit of pizzazz compared to the standard blah black on black. Additional plusses are perfect reliability (so far) and its really quite accurate.
Oh well, even if a gun’s soul can’t be truly nailed down it was a fun topic to think about
Stay safe.