BrokenWheel
Member
It has to small and reliable. Here is what I narrowed it down to
Kel-tec p3at: Pros very small, light and therefore most likly to be carried more often. Lifetime warranty. Trigger light and decent. Cons: concerned about reliability. Feels cheap.
Ruger LCR (the revolver) : Pros Solid trigger pull, feels more comfortable because of larger size. Solid feel to it.
Cons because of the cylinder, physically larger and heavier. Might not carry it then. Whats the use then?
I'm really torn with these two. I feel that if I go with the keltec it may not go boom when I need it to and the smaller size may cause it to fumble in my hands when I need it. However, the Ruger is dimensionally larger and I would want to avoid wearing a IWB holster because I dont want to go out and buy new pants, 2 sizes bigger to fit the holster).
Sorry confused....
Kel-tec p3at: Pros very small, light and therefore most likly to be carried more often. Lifetime warranty. Trigger light and decent. Cons: concerned about reliability. Feels cheap.
Ruger LCR (the revolver) : Pros Solid trigger pull, feels more comfortable because of larger size. Solid feel to it.
Cons because of the cylinder, physically larger and heavier. Might not carry it then. Whats the use then?
I'm really torn with these two. I feel that if I go with the keltec it may not go boom when I need it to and the smaller size may cause it to fumble in my hands when I need it. However, the Ruger is dimensionally larger and I would want to avoid wearing a IWB holster because I dont want to go out and buy new pants, 2 sizes bigger to fit the holster).
Sorry confused....