Poll - should the U.S. invade Iraq

[MitchSchaft]

Troll alert

 

[rick458]

Very Strange , His post count went from 1 to 0

 

[RustyHammer]

Tactical Nuke ... it's them now or us later! (They'd sure as hell do the same IF they could!)

 

[telewinz]

sometime before the next iceage would be nice.

 

[Gary H]

I love the strategy. Whenever the U.S. wants to attack another country, we simply instruct the opposing military as to when to attack themselves. I'm sure that this is plan "A" and I hope that it works, but I fear that we will need to put the fear of God into them before they take care of Saddam. The moment that the folks guarding Saddam fear the U.S. more than Saddam is the moment that Saddam no longer rules.

Next, we need to tell N. Korea to attack itself and then it is Iran's turn. This could revolutionize warfare.

 

[WilderBill]

If we tried that on France, would they surrender to themselves???

Oh yeah, if we invade let's use guns, OK?
( Helps keep it more on topic.)

 

[clem]

If we don't, well that will be it for "our word".

But, if Iraq does turn over...............

 

[larryw]

Yeah, you're right Med 10. Its pathetic that the farmers who grow the crops that feed us and tens of millions outside our borders rely on oil. Just think how nice things would be if they went back to ox and plow.

Think you'd be part of the 10% of the popluation who survive this Luddite dream?

Should we invade? Yes.

Will we? No.

 

[RustyHammer]

Invade, NO!

Drop a nuke on their *** ... maybe?!?!?!

 

[10-Ring]

Much sooner rather than later & probably w/o UN consensus (I say consensus because w/ don't need their approval for anything!)

 

[seeker_two]

Oh yeah, if we invade let's use guns, OK?

OK, but remember----use enough gun...



(Thanks to the 29th Field Artillery Regiment page )

 

[Med 10]

larryw. Where do come off thinking that my statement applied to farmers? That is a ludicrous thing to say. Re-read my post before you go shooting youre mouth off. Not one time did I mention farmers.