Okay, have a question that may require some math.
I am looking at this scope at Kalinka Optics. I have bought from them before and things go relatively smoothly. However I notice that this scope, along with another scope I have has an MOA of 1.8 at 100m. My other scope that isn't variable has the same layout.
Now I was looking to get another scope, a Trijicon but I noticead that the MOA was 3 inches at 100 yards.
When I converted cm to inches for my POSP scope, it came out to 1.96 inches (5cm) at 109.36 yards. So it would seem as though the POSP scope is a bit more accurate. (however I cannot use the bullet drop compensator as it is not designed for .223 but the website claims it works with all calibers which I haven't figure out...or maybe it would work since gravity pulls on all objects at the same rate...I dunno....didn't major in math).
Am I correct in this or the Trijicon have a better MOA? Please help
- Signed
Mathematically challenged
I am looking at this scope at Kalinka Optics. I have bought from them before and things go relatively smoothly. However I notice that this scope, along with another scope I have has an MOA of 1.8 at 100m. My other scope that isn't variable has the same layout.
Now I was looking to get another scope, a Trijicon but I noticead that the MOA was 3 inches at 100 yards.
When I converted cm to inches for my POSP scope, it came out to 1.96 inches (5cm) at 109.36 yards. So it would seem as though the POSP scope is a bit more accurate. (however I cannot use the bullet drop compensator as it is not designed for .223 but the website claims it works with all calibers which I haven't figure out...or maybe it would work since gravity pulls on all objects at the same rate...I dunno....didn't major in math).
Am I correct in this or the Trijicon have a better MOA? Please help
- Signed
Mathematically challenged