Power Loads For The .40 S&W

Status
Not open for further replies.
A Zen like question for the group to meditate on...

If a wolf is shot in the forest... and no one is there to hear it...Is there a sound?

And further....

Can the wolf tell the difference between a 180 HP travelling at 1050 fps vs 1000 fps... or even 950 or 900 fps?

Think on it Grasshopper...

If you believe there is... then you must never shoot game beyond very strict distance parameters... within about 20 yards or so, and never shoot if the outside temperature is lower than 72 degrees! That 180gr bullet travelling at 1050fps at the muzzle will only be travelling at around 1000fps within 25 yards, 900 within 50 yards, and that same load will start out 100-150 fps slower at the muzzle if you shoot at 20 degrees Fahrenheit or below.

If the wolf CAN tell the difference... then you have run into a Wolf that is way smarter than you... and you are already DEAD MEAT !!!


See what I am getting at here...?

Bullet performance is more a function of SHOT PLACEMENT ... bullet construction and bullet weight in that order...

For defence against unknown and various size threats, (ie... man to moose in your case...) moderate loadings of a reasonably substantial bullet weight is the best you can do.

You can optimize a load for one type of target..man or beast... but not for both at the same time.

So... My main concern is always to achieve 100% functional reliability in the weapon I am literally staking my life on.

I would always...DEFINITELY choose a loading a few fps slower if I could save 6000psi in chamber pressure...absolutely!

Best thing you can do with a handgun after you make damn sure it goes BANG every time, is put a big deep hole in one side and out the other. T/C bullets are about as good as HP or semi-wadcutters in real life performance on game, in my experience, and they penetrate deeper and feed better. The only real underachievers are Round Noses... (except for .45 hardball of course!)

IMHO - 800x is the best powder for top velocity loads is 40s&w, if you don't mind weighing charges, a lot of lot to lot variation, and temperature sensitivity. Power Pistol and Longshot eliminate some of the temperature sensitivity, measure much better, and don't really give up that much velocity ...except at the top end... like Clark sez.

If I am feeling particularly indecisive, and I often am, I load my 40 or my 10 mags with alternating 180 gr FMJ T/C and Speer Gold Dots...both real good performers at this velocity level.

Don't load up a whole lot of ammo before you test a few loads in YOUR pistol...and btw...what pistol are you getting?
 
It's Not Dead Yet!

BTT for Clark or.......someone to post some new warm .40 s&w data preferably with 3n38 or?
So Many Powders and so little time! Thanks feller loaders!
 
experimentally posting

May have to try a 'faster' powder under those 200's, 'cause I'm otherwise out of room.

Hmmm........


FWIW, I have no desire to shoot 200's @ 1200, but maybe somebody else does.....for good reasons, too.
I have bigger guns uh-huh.
 
BTT For Outside The Box .40 S&W Loads

Hello again, I clocked some more X-sperimentals yesterday.
The suprise (or not!) was the 200gn XTPs that were accurate from the G-23 and clocked an honest 1050 fps with 7.0gns of trusty ole 800x. This load also was on the light side of recoil compared with the Longshot loads.
I had no visable or measureable smilies with any of the loads tested, temp was a balmy 50degrees.
Since I'd not seen much work with Unique I tried 9.0gns with a Sierra 135gner that clocked 1360fps, again from a G-23..not bad compared to the same bullet with 11.5gns of Longshot which chronoed an honest 1500fps and feels like the gun is on the outer level of survival tho gain, no case expansion. The test load of 135s with 10.1gns of Longshot clocked 1350fps and were comfy to shoot.
ALL normal warnings apply, my gun and experiences only
New Winchester brass with Fed Small Pistol primers and OAL around 1.130
Just for grins I ran some Ka-Boom level loads through a Para .40 with a Nowlin full supported barrel, the .40 ain't all that weak running 165gn Gold Dots to 1575fps!!!!!!!!! Don't try that in your Glock!
 
I really don't understand all this Clark bashing. While Steve Smith is a valuable poster sometimes, I have learned much more from Clark's posts. Not only that, but he is giving information that you can't find anywhere else. And he has been doing it for several years. Steve doesn't tell you anything that any experienced High Power couldn't already tell you.

On every occasion when Clark posts, there is always someone that has to bash the guy. All of you Clark detractors begin to sound like one of the following three:

1) Those whiny pacifists that rue, "Why do you NEED a gun?" Sounds alot like "Why, oh why do you NEED to exceed posted load data?!"

2) Those that said the world was flat. The king says it's flat. Everyone KNOWS it is flat. Good enough for me! MUST be true!

3) Charlie Brown's teacher. Wa. Wa-Wa-Waa Waaa Waaaah.....


JMO.....
 
Clark Etc

Mornin Mylhouse!
I too have had a few problems with Clarks enormous data dumps online BUT it's always been worth the reading time!
If only with all that data was accompanied with chronograph readings, some powders do not give more velocity when compressed and actually drop off velocity.
 
Just a comment on longshot.

It DOES NOT like to be loaded light or with a wimpy crimp. Going light with this powder is a recipe for a squib. Try to stay toward the middle to top of the published load recipes.
 
1100 with a 200

If you do it let me know how you did it. I like the sound of it. I can get 1200 with a 180.
 
Longshot powder

max load and the primer that gives the best velocity. For me it was federal. The mag primers gave a big velocity drop.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top