Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

"practice" rifle.....?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by MikePaiN, Feb 2, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. MikePaiN

    MikePaiN Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Messages:
    1,029
    Location:
    CT, USA
    This is my main rifle. An AO M1 Carbine in a Choate fixed stock.
    DSC02971.jpg

    I don't get to shoot it much because I belong to an indoor club that does not allow centerfire rifle. .22lr rifle is okay, so I want to get a practice rifle in .22lr to use at my club.
    Its down to two choices. Help me decide...
    First choice is a Ruger 10/22, put it in a Choate fixed stock like the one my M1 is in, add a set of peep sights(Tech-Sights) and a Steel Lips mag or two. This will be very close to the M1 in all ways and will cost ~$400.
    The other option is to get a S&W M&P15-22 the cost around here is ~$430 w/2 25r mags and a BUIS set. The feel will be a little different but sights will be close and there will be no farting around, just take it out of the box and start "kicking brass" ... :D
     
    Last edited: Feb 2, 2011
  2. BrocLuno

    BrocLuno Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2010
    Messages:
    2,088
    Location:
    Kalif Kollective
    I'd build the 10-22 or a Remington 597 with the same or close stock as your center fire. If you are trying to build muscle memory and ergonomic training so you can transfer those practiced skills to the center fire, you have to do it that way.

    If you just want a 22 rifle, do anything that catches your fancy.
     
  3. henschman

    henschman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2010
    Messages:
    2,880
    Location:
    Oklahoma City
    I'd go 10/22. Closer to the rifle you're trying to simulate, especially since you can get the same stock for it, and those Tech Sights are great. I am a Shoot Boss with Project Appleseed, and I have a Tech-sighted 10/22 that I've used as a loaner rifle for marksmanship clinics for about a year and a half. It has had thousands of rounds put through it during that time, some under less than great conditions, and it has always worked well. By contrast, I have seen 4 or 5 M&P 15-22s on the line, and every one I've seen has spit out the extractor! One is owned by a fellow instructor, and he as had to send it back to S&W 3 times because of that! That can't be a coincidence.

    The 10/22 is just way more tried and true, and has way more after-market parts available for it if you want to do something else to it later.
     
  4. CraigC
    • Contributing Member

    CraigC Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2006
    Messages:
    15,327
    Location:
    West Tennessee
    I'd do the 10/22. It'll be super easy to put together and you can upgrade it as time and money allow. Plus the ergonomics will more closely mimic the M1.

    Tactical Innovations has the best 25rd magazines available. Worth every cent.
     
  5. MikePaiN

    MikePaiN Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Messages:
    1,029
    Location:
    CT, USA
    Thanks, I hadn't heard about the "problems" with the 15-22....
    I'm leaning hard toward the 10/22 build anyway, I did a couple 10/22 projects in the past
    and even have a few extra parts hanging around.
    I'll post some pics when its done, which should be by the end of the month...
     
  6. TonyAngel

    TonyAngel Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,735
    I have two of the Rugers and one of the Smiths in .22. I bought the Smith shortly after they were released. My subjective opinion is that the Smith AR is a cool little rifle, but doesn't shoot nearly as well as the 10/22 and mine is particularly ammunition sensitive. It's gotten to a point that I only shoot Mini Mags out of it.

    Now that I think about it, I haven't touched the Smith in a couple of months. If I had to choose, it would be the Ruger all the way. Besides, the price on the Smith is rediculous for a plinker. You can by a tack driver bolt gun for less than the price of the Smith.
     
  7. HM2PAC

    HM2PAC Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2007
    Messages:
    868
    Location:
    Maine, USA
    10/22

    Having an M1 carbine and a 10/22 set up the same way is one of the more practical things I've read in quite a while.
     
  8. WNTFW

    WNTFW Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,906
    I would go tech sights on a .22 over the .22 AR. The 10/22 would be good as would others but the 10/22 could mimic the m1.
     
  9. FMJMIKE

    FMJMIKE Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2007
    Messages:
    1,577
    Location:
    Copper Hill, Virginia
    10/22.....................:d
     
  10. MikePaiN

    MikePaiN Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Messages:
    1,029
    Location:
    CT, USA
    Its a done deal.. The 10/22 project it is :)
    I'm ordering up the parts before head out work this this morning.

    Besides 10/22 Tech-Sights......XS also makes a Ghost-Ring set for the 10/22
     
  11. MikePaiN

    MikePaiN Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Messages:
    1,029
    Location:
    CT, USA
    I bought the basic carbine today(what a great deal from the LGS NIB $199, incl. 1 25round Steel-Lips, 1 10round Ruger clear mag and the 10round black that comes with the rifle), installed the Tech-Sights and Tuffer-Buffer(had an extra). Its Choate stock is on the way and soon it will be a real close match to its big brother. I should be able to get it out for a break-in/sight-in Sunday.
    Here's the build so far.
    DSC03214.jpg

    DSC03215.jpg

    DSC03216.jpg
     
  12. MikePaiN

    MikePaiN Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Messages:
    1,029
    Location:
    CT, USA
    I'll get them out in natural light to get some better pics soon. For now these will have to do. The 10/22 feels amazingly like the M1 Carbine...I'm happy with how these came out..

    DSC03225.jpg

    DSC03224.jpg

    DSC03220.jpg

    DSC03219.jpg
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page