Pardon me for bringing this up, and the length of this description, because I really like my new Carbine.
It has been kept clean and has reliability problems. It is an Auto-Ordnance, about five weeks old. The store price was about $700.
My quite limited gun background has been with a single-shot bolt-action .22 Savage, plus a few unique opportunities to shoot some handguns etc.
This carbine has been fired about seven times, and cleaned after the last five with nitro solvent, then oil. Using the small single patches, also wiped down the chamber and also oiled all the slots, moving parts, plus oiled both the short and long magazines (15/30 rounds).
Almost each time I put about six rounds in the short mag., the gun jams and one round is cocked at an angle, usually just below, or partly in the chamber. Even when the other two much more experienced guys used it today, the same problem happens. Really disappointing more than frustrating.
This was with the shorter (15 rd.) GOOD magazine, which might have sat in the store for months attached to the gun.
Today, I assumed that the large magazine, which cost extra, would be better.
The rounds were not even going up into the chamber most of the time!
Maybe these are NOT built to the same specs as they were during WW2 and Korea? I read this in a discounted book on combat rifles at Borders Books today. It covers guns all over the world since WW1. The M-1 Carbine paragraph stated that some recent manufacturers were under-capitalized and took shortcuts. I've not seen this yet in Highroad or generic Internet articles.
A friend brought his AR-15 today, and there was no comparison at all regarding reliability. I could have gone to war with his gun. Even at a fairly short distance, in a survival situation against his AR-15, I would have been dead very quickly, round for round and all else being equal. A bit ironic? This friend from Germany bought a small Walther pistol, yet also an AR-15.
A few hunters I've chatted with at random suggested that the springs on the better magazine are not good.
A knowledgeable deputy near here with a solid background with semi-auto. guns suggested that the receiver (?) or ejector might be bad. The lingo is still new to me.
I'm not hinting that anybody buy another gun. I've always liked the classic looks and wooden stock of both the Garands, Carbines and M-14s, and I really like this gun. Part of the problem might be my inexperience.
What if the store's gunsmith has no dummy rounds to test it with? How will it get repaired for free while under warranty? The store already lubed/oiled it about three weeks ago. But I don't think that the gunsmith saw it. The gun was brought out from the main room behind the loooong glass counter which contains many interesting handguns....the store is "G. & A.".
A second gunsmith at a different (sporting goods) store is recommended by two or three other guys who are familiar with various guns.
Frankly, I feel like maybe I did not get my money's worth. Even if we never have a civil insurrection or chaos after an earthquake from the New Madrid Fault nearby, it would be nice to have a smoothly operating machine. A major problem could spread to other areas. We are just one deliberately edited/cut videotape away from a nightmare (as in L.A.). Presented with the chance to shoot an old but very reliable Carbine, I might consider an offer to trade guns, until mine works much better.