mmorris
Member
I tested these two units today, and I am posting the results here.
This was not scientific or rigorous in method. Just a few 22's over the end-to-end units. I don't know for sure what the ammunition was, I just used what was in the magazines. Could even be mixed.
I did remove these from the list below as erroneous data:
ProChrono Cauldwell (disagreement)
1008 1071 63
1054 1099 45
These were the last two shots in the string.
03/22/16 04:00 PM
Ruger MKIII
ProChrono Cauldwell (disagreement)
1054 1069 15
1042 1058 16
1013 1030 17
1059 1076 17
1004 1020 16
1029 1043 14
1001 1017 16
1049 1067 18
1054 1065 11
1029 1041 12
1031 1045 14
981 994 13
1018 1021 3
1040 1055 15
1064 1073 9
1008 1020 12
This was not scientific or rigorous in method. Just a few 22's over the end-to-end units. I don't know for sure what the ammunition was, I just used what was in the magazines. Could even be mixed.
I did remove these from the list below as erroneous data:
ProChrono Cauldwell (disagreement)
1008 1071 63
1054 1099 45
These were the last two shots in the string.
03/22/16 04:00 PM
Ruger MKIII
ProChrono Cauldwell (disagreement)
1054 1069 15
1042 1058 16
1013 1030 17
1059 1076 17
1004 1020 16
1029 1043 14
1001 1017 16
1049 1067 18
1054 1065 11
1029 1041 12
1031 1045 14
981 994 13
1018 1021 3
1040 1055 15
1064 1073 9
1008 1020 12