Publicizing permit holders names (Indiana)

Status
Not open for further replies.

madmike

Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2003
Messages
2,097
Location
In a well-equipped suburban bunker
Plan to post list of gun permit holders online causes debate
http://www.fortwayne.com/mld/newssentinel/8191628.htm

COMMENTARY

By Linda Austin

of The News-Sentinel


My phone started ringing almost as soon as the ad appeared in The News-Sentinel on Wednesday promoting today's story on gun permits in Allen County. Several gun permit holders called to protest our plan to post online the list of gun permit holders, which is a public record.

They expressed concern that the list would provide burglars who want to steal guns with a road map to their homes. Or they said the information would make it easier for stalkers to find their victims, who may have obtained a gun for protection. Or they said posting the list would weaken a gun permit holder's defense by removing the element of surprise.

Their calls prompted a re-examination of our plans. I set out to talk to editors and ethicists, professors and prosecutors from across the country to try to assess what would provide the greatest good for the most people: posting the list or not.

The more than two dozen people with whom I spoke, including readers, staffers and the previously mentioned experts, seemed evenly split. So, I decided to delay posting the list while I solicit more feedback. You can register your views either online at www.news-sentinel.com, or by calling 423-4646 if you favor posting the list or 423-4793 if you oppose posting it. Keep in mind that if we do post the list, it would consist of names and towns only of the permit holders.

I can't promise the majority will rule here, but I can promise that I'll consider everyone's opinion. As a firm believer in the marketplace of free ideas, I'm hoping that the truth will come out.

If you're still making up your mind, here's a review of the pros and cons from the people with whom I've already spoken.

Some argued that because the list is a public record available to everyone, we should post it. Others said because it is available from the state to anyone with $25 to buy the database there is no need to post it.

Some viewed it as a logical extension of the other public records that we publish in the paper, including marriage licenses, divorces and births; or the public records we have posted online, including tax assessments, real estate sales prices and tax delinquents.

They said by putting the information online or in the paper, we're just making it more convenient for people to exercise a right they already have to examine the records.

Another argument advanced for posting the list is that the state has determined that there's a public good in licensing people to carry handguns and making such information accessible to others.

The information has the potential to warn people about others who may be carrying a gun. If you're sending your child to my house to play, perhaps you'd like to know if I have a permit to carry a gun.

Or maybe you're curious about whether a potential business associate, or
a neighbor or new acquaintance has a permit.

"There is danger for children when there is a gun present, and that is a strong point," said Gregory E. Favre, distinguished fellow in journalism values at The Poynter Institute for journalism training in Florida.

"There are too many cases when youngsters have been killed or when parents' guns are used to kill others, as has happened in the school shootings. Will knowing about the gun permits completely stop this? No, but it might prevent some. Even one would be worth it.

"And while I am a strong advocate that people have a right to a private life, these folks have interjected themselves into the public by purchasing a gun permit," said Favre, former president of the American Society of Newspaper Editors.

The list doesn't include everyone who has a gun. Plenty of people carry guns illegally. No permit is required for rifles and shotguns. And just because you have a permit doesn't mean you have a gun.

Fort Wayne Police Chief Rusty York doubted burglars would use the list to target the homes of permit holders. "Burglars are opportunists," he said.

On the flip side, some said knowing a person has a gun permit could send burglars or stalkers looking for easier marks.

Weighing in against posting were Maxwell E.P. King, former editor of The
Philadelphia Inquirer; Bob Steele, Nelson Poynter scholar for journalism
values at the Poynter Institute; Allen County Prosecutor Karen Richards;
and reader Fran Hale.

"The two reservations you report -- that gun thieves will be aided and that people who bought guns for personal protection may be compromised -- do have some merit," wrote King, former chairman of the Values and Ethics Committee of the American Society of Newspaper Editors. "Publishing the names could seem needlessly intrusive." Or as Steele put it: "I don't see the journalistic purpose of this one."

Prosecutor Richards described posting the database as "a very dangerous thing to do. ... I think you're putting people at risk, especially putting them at risk for burglaries."

And finally Hale described the situation of a relative who has a gun permit and frequently leaves his pregnant wife and two children home alone. "You're putting my family in danger," she said.

Please let me know what you think.


What do you think?
Should The News-Sentinel post on its Web site a searchable list of the names of gun permit holders in Allen County, listing only their names and the towns where they live? Click here to register your views online, or call in your response (423-4646 to answer yes or 423-4793 to answer no). The list is a public record.

#######

My comments:

"And while I am a strong advocate that people have a right to a private life, these folks have interjected themselves into the public by purchasing a gun permit," said Favre, former president of the American Society of Newspaper
Editors.


Right, so we're forced to beg permission to exercise a right, and by PAYING for that permission, we're somehow agreeing to a third party publicizing personal information about us.

"There are too many cases when youngsters have been killed or when parents' guns are used to kill others, as has happened in the school shootings. Will knowing about the gun permits completely stop this? No, but it might prevent some. Even one would be worth it.

No permit is needed for a gun at home, only to carry. So the logic fails. And "if it saves one life..." I guarantee if we ban cigarettes we will save more than one life. How about booze? Oh, wait, we tried that.

That this vomitous piece of debris is quoted as relevant and an authority, rather than being ignored for the reprehensible scumsucker he is, tells me all I need to know. Thank God this atheist lives in Greenwood and not Ft Wayne.

But hey, didn't Ft Wayne have the mayor who wanted to adopt daylight savings time because "more crime happens at night"? Considering the lack of logic and reason up there, perhaps you should be more concerned about the schools than whether or not my friends are licensed to carry guns.

I am disgusted, I am enraged, I am incensed. If this comes to pass, I will configure my future travel plans to avoid getting gas or otherwise spending money in that waste of a town.

And I will follow through with my promise to post public information about anyone who posts public information about my fellow gun owners. Tit for tat. Mayor, owner, publisher, editor, reporter. After all, it's all public information. Somewhere.

######

If you call the NO number above, 260-423-4793, you will find the mailbox full. It will forward you to another voice mail.

And the editor's phone number is
Editor in Chief Linda Austin, 260-461-8239

Hey! Why don't we have them post the names of people who buy the Quran? Or the bible? Or books on gay sex? What if you're curious as to whether your secretary buys thongs or briefs?

What if we all mind our @#$^%#$^% business?
 
This happened a couple of years back in the Elkhart Truth published in Elkhart, IN. In Indiana the names of license holders are public record. You can order a CD of the list from the Indiana State Police.

My attitudes remain the same...GOOD! This gives a clear picture of exactly how many people are licensed to carry concealed in Indiana. You don't need to be any kind of genius to realize that this list represents an extremely small percentage of the firearms owners in Indiana. This list also represents only the tiniest fraction of the firearms in Indiana residents possession.

As to privacy issues, you gave up your claim to that when you applied for the license. You have four choices:
1) obey the law as it is - get the state's permission to defend yourself and be exposed on public record

2) lobby to change the law - with the attendant risk of opening the law to further expand the power of the state and to further shrink your liberty

3) lobby to repeal the law - a viable option but also carries the attendant risks as mentioned above

4) ignore the law - at your own risk

Chipper
 
I found the voting link dead. I went to the article by the first link, and voted there. I included this comment.

"The number of ccw license holders will be a single digit percentage of population. The number of permittees that carry full time will be a minority of the permit holders. Persons legally carrying concealed will less than half of one percent of population. Violent crimes will drop by ten percent or more. Check statistics from other states. The criminals fear of armed citizens reduces crime. I feel publication is counter productive."

I do not see the publication of this list as important. It would be something for a few busy bodies to gossip about. It may stress a few social situations. I do not think criminals will pay any attention.
 
Better

Better then most newspaper who think that the fact that we don;t want our names in the paper means we must have something to hide.
 
Interesting article here:
http://jordan.fortwayne.com/ns/gundata/guns0.php

Just a few blurbs:
The average Allen County resident with a gun permit -- who may not actually carry a gun -- is a middle-aged white male between 41 and 50. He's short -- 5 feet to 5 feet, 6 inches -- and overweight -- 190 pounds to 200 pounds. He has brown hair and eyes, and lives in the 46809 ZIP code on the city's southwest corner. When he votes in primary elections, he casts a Republican ballot.

I wonder what the average journalist looks like there?

Variations from the average gun permit holder
* There's one man in Allen County with a permit who
stands less than 5 feet and weighs less than 100 pounds. Forty-four women are shorter than 4 feet, 6 inches, and 20 women weigh less than 100 pounds.
* The tallest men are between 6 feet and 6 feet, 6 inches, and the tallest women -- eight of them -- are taller than 6 feet. Among the men, eight weigh more than 400 pounds, while the heaviest women -- six in all -- weigh more than 300 pounds.
* Fifty-one permit holders are younger than 20 years old. Five of them are older than 90.

This is interesting, but what is it relevant to?

Jeff
 
...while I am a strong advocate that people have a right to a private life, these folks have interjected themselves into the public by purchasing a gun permit...

Wrong. Those of us who choose to exercise our constitutionally guaranteed freedoms have not so-called "interjected" ourselves into the public. We are the public as much as anyone and everyone else.

Indiana needs to changes its law.
 
Just because the info IS public record doesn't mean the paper has to report it. Would they report the names of people who have abortions? (quoting Shamaya here). Attend synagogue or mosque? Open new checking accounts? Apply for food stamps?


And IN CCW exceeds 5% of the population. No training required, $25 for 4 years, only restrictions are fed offices and school buildings, and no waiting period to purchase if you have it. Class III state, plenty of guns (1500 table show this weekend :D) and very few areas (Ft Whine and South Bendover being the only two notable) where guns aren't worshipped with the reverence they deserve.
 
"There is danger for children when there is a gun present, and that is a strong point," said Gregory E. Favre, distinguished fellow in journalism values at The Poynter Institute for journalism training in Florida.

"There are too many cases when youngsters have been killed or when parents' guns are used to kill others, as has happened in the school shootings. Will knowing about the gun permits completely stop this? No, but it might prevent some. Even one would be worth it.
HA! Is he that concerned about his kids using MY weapons to commit murder? Perhaps the public would be better served to have a pic of his offspring printed! Yet this "distinguished fellow" wouldn't think twice about letting his kids ride in a car with someone else driving to a movie or a church outing. I am SICK of this "if it saves even one kid it would be worth it" BS! People die. Kids die. Fill in your pool. Cut down all the climbing trees. Shred the trampoline. Melt the 5 gal buckets. Crush the cars. If we all lived in sterile environs they STILL would die. People pull out this horse-hockey trump card when they don't have spit to hold up their end of an argument. Ask the newsie publisher to print their address & phone at the end of that CCW list.
"There is danger for children when there is a gun present, and that is a strong point," No more so than bat, golf club, hammer, axe, saw, length of pipe, etc! Not a "strong point" fellow, no point. Totally fallacious, yet said with authority. STILL BS!
:fire:
 
My comments:

We applied for permits to legally carry firearms for our own personal protection. We passed all of the necessary background checks, submitted to fingerprinting and payed for the privledge of owning a permission slip issued by the state. We are not a danger to the public. By publishing the list of permit holders you jepordize our safety from an educated criminal. Not all criminals are as ignorant of the information available to them as you would like. By making it easier for a criminal to choose his victims, myself and many others would likely hold your paper partially responsible for publishing our names should our homes be robbed as a result. If you're so intent on protecting the public from firearms wielding citizens, then I suggest you print the names and addresses of those criminals convicted of gun crimes. They're far more likely to assualt you or your children than we are.
 
The only reason newspapers get excited about publishing CCW lists is that anti-gun reporters and editors see it as a way to discourage CCW when the legislative and legal avenues to block it have been exhausted.

Since the info is public record to anyone who really wants it already, the re-reporting of this information is not "unbiased journalisim". If they wish to maintain any intelectual honesty, and decide to post the information anyway, it ought to be placed in the editorial pages. While the information is indeed fact, the act of posting that information is an act of advocacy.

The addresses, phone numbers, and property tax records of the editors and staff of the Fort Wayne News-Sentinel are public record as well. I would encourage some pro-RKBA groups to start looking up that information.
 
I wrote them too, saying that all this does is fuel the anti-gunners to chastaise me for observing my rights.
 
I wrote Miss Austin & explained to her that there were no valid reasons for publishing the names. There were however a few reasons that could only be justified by the media's bias against gun owners.

But I went on to explain that if they published the names of CCW permit holders w/o each ones' consent then I & a few other bloggers would publish all legally obtainable info we could find on the staff at the News-Sentinal.

A few other bloggers are on board with me & now it's mainly a waiting game. I haven't received any response yet from Miss Austin.

What y'all could do is if you have access to any legally obtainable info on any of the staff of the publication in question, e-mail me at [email protected]. I'll sit on the info until they publish the names of CCW holders, then I'll post it on my blog & send it to the other bloggers who are in on this.

& just to be clear - I still think that having to grovel for permission & then pay extortion to carry is a perversion of the concept of "Right to Carry". But I understand how some would feel compelled to obey an unjust law rather than face down the government. So I see no need in adding insult to injury by publishing the names of those who merely wish to protect themselves.

BTW, the names & other info of police officers are a matter of public record - do any of y'all think a paper would publish them? Or do y'all think a paper would show some discretion about publishing the names, pics & other info of agents who may have to work undercover? If any of y'all have a chance to, bring that up to a journalist & see what their response is.


But if y'all could send me any & all legally obtainable info y'all can find I'd appreciate it.
 
Has anyone found a lawyer, consulted him/her about the possibility of a class action suit for harassment and invasion of privacy (or just plain old emotional distress)?

The time is now. Every gun owner who currently subscribes to that liberal rag needs to cancel their subscription to the newspaper immediately, but not before they flood the editorial department with examples of why gun ownership is, in fact, good for the children--if one child's life is saved because a violent home invader got put down before he could kidnap/molest the children, then their logic is nullified.

If these two-faced liberals really wanted to save children, then why do they support abortion?
 
Get the database of the CCW people. Find out EVERYTHING you can about those who AREN'T on it. Once a week, you could run a full page ad of just a few hundred people who are on the non-ccw list. Headline: These people are unarmed and easy targets for criminals. Then list where they live, where they work, the company's work hours, plate numbers, car descriptions, etc. Everything you can. Maybe do a journalist as "Easy pickings of the week" and go into extremely fine detail.

Don't do TOO many at once, when it's someone's week to be in the ad, it should be pretty easy to find.
 
The addresses, phone numbers, and property tax records of the editors and staff of the Fort Wayne News-Sentinel are public record as well. I would encourage some pro-RKBA groups to start looking up that information.

Were I an Indiana resident, this is exactly what I would do. I would then let these presstitutes know that if the list of people exercising a constitutional right to bear arms is published, so will a list of those editors and staff that DON'T bear arms. I'll bet dollars to donuts that they won't like the implications of that. I'd also throw in a few anti-gun politicians, just for the fun of it - maybe that will help to get the law changed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top