Seancass
Member
http://www.purdueexponent.org/?module=article&story_id=9450
Feel free to comment on his flawless logic.
Feel free to comment on his flawless logic.
As of right now, the student is facing only drug charges. Why are there no charges concerning the weapon? Answer: The gun was probably in the residence legally.
In New York City, there's a slogan, "If you see something, say something." Every member of the Purdue community needs to follow this guideline. If your friend has such a gun, is doing drugs or things that just aren't right, tell them you think so.
If your friend has such a gun, is doing drugs or things that just aren't right, tell them you think so
No, not really a hotbed of Marxism here in West Lafayette--students are busy studying, working or drinking beer. Maybe a hotbed of engineering or slide rule collecting.
The author is a disgrace to the once honorable profession of journalism.
It is the responsibility of city officials to do what they can to prevent another Virginia Tech incident; mandatory registration would be a logical step.
Me said:Mike Westervelt,
I just finished reading your article regarding the contents found in your neighbor's apartment. While I, at first, shared your concern regarding the drugs and rifle found inside your neighbor's residence, I quickly found myself shaking my head at your article.
First, you said the rifle was legal, yet you continue the remainder of the article talking about the rifle, instead of talking about the drugs. He didn't own the rifle illegally. So what's the problem?
Second, you didn't do any homework at all. As someone who's educated on the topic, you completely misrepresent the federal laws governing ownership and purchase of automatic weapons in the US. Whoever you got that information from obviously has no idea what they're talking about. It is irresponsible of a journalist to intentionally do such a thing, especially seeing as their work is read by the masses, which usually are easily swayed.
Finally, it seems to me that the whole purpose of your article was simply to say, "I don't approve of others exercising their Second Amendment rights for all lawful purposes, and will personally advocate legislature that will further restrict those that would seek to legally purchase firearms." If I were to say the same thing about the First Amendment, you'd be sending me a similar email.
The next time you write something about a Constitutional right, I recommend you do a little homework.
Rob F
What is even more scary is thinking of the clientel the drug dealer must have had if the AK was in fact there for protection and not just an unrelated hobby.
I'd like to say quite a few very specific things that would get me banned if I did say them.ROMAK IV said:Another reason a liberal arts degree is like no degree at all.