Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

QUALITY of AK recievers...

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by briang2ad, Nov 8, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. briang2ad

    briang2ad Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2005
    Messages:
    671
    Plenty of AKs now on the market, with MUCh to choose from. Not as much "milspec" available as with the AR market.

    I know that many say that having a 'REAL' AK receiver as in a WASR 10, SAR, FEG, or SAIGA/Arsenal are preferable - why? What makes their sheet metal better?

    Reason I ask, is that I saw an add from one maker of a "premium" AK, and they touted that DCI make the only receiver BETTER than original...

    Thanks.
     
  2. stubbicatt

    stubbicatt Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2007
    Messages:
    3,413
    Location:
    Colorado
    I remember earlier in the century when parts kits abounded, and the receivers available were Ohio Rapid Fire and ITM. These were OK shells, but then NoDakSpud came on the scene. These are very fine receivers, and I would put them up against any other stamped receiver for straightness, and uniformity any time.

    Now, slip into the world of milled receivers and you step into a realm in which I am only comfortable with the PolyTech and Arsenal offerings. This is not to say that others are not good, just that I know these and I am comfortable with them.

    As far as "MilSpec" goes, I don't even know what that means. Do you? I mean, really, do you? I don't think anybody knows what that means.

    If your receiver shell is straight, and the rivets all line up and it is properly heat treated, you will build a nice Kalashnikov.

    :)
     
  3. GunTech

    GunTech Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2007
    Messages:
    3,878
    Location:
    Helena MT
  4. Shear_stress

    Shear_stress Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    2,728
    Buy a B-west-made AK and find out. . .seriously, though, the com-bloc countries devoted a lot of attention to the single-most important facet of their national security. Like practically any gun part, AKM receivers need to be dimensionally accurate and properly heat treated to work well and last more than a few rounds. It's easy to take for granted the notion that "all AK receivers are the same" until you find some that are junk. As Stubbicat pointed out, some of the U.S.-made ones were just that.
     
  5. zhyla

    zhyla Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2009
    Messages:
    894
    You know all those AK's you've seen with cracked or warped receivers? Yeah, me neither. People got to have something to worry about though.
     
  6. briansmithwins

    briansmithwins Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2005
    Messages:
    4,132
    How about egged out FCG pivot holes and ejectors that are dented into uselessness after 200 rounds? Those things have happened to people that used crap receivers. BSW
     
    Last edited: Nov 9, 2010
  7. briang2ad

    briang2ad Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2005
    Messages:
    671
    OK - which ones are good???

    Are they as good as an ORIGINAL FEG, Rommy, Russian. etc.?
     
  8. Ian

    Ian Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    3,857
    I have been very happy with a variety of NoDak receivers. OTOH, I've made a couple from flats and they work just fine too.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page