I know in general this has been beat to death, but I do have a question that I would like some serious thought on.
I've read a bunch of the bear defense threads and did quite a bit of research on the subject. Almost always it's said that if you have to shoot a charging bear, your only hope is for a good shot into the brain pan. This being the case, wouldn't .357 Mag be just as good as the larger .44 Mag and up calibers? Or, do the larger calibers offer some better effect in the case you miss the head?
I guess my train of thought is that .357 Mag would penetrate the skull fine (with a good hardcast load) and do the required damage and allow faster follow up shots (if you ever got any).
Now, if I was hunting bear, I would be looking to shoot other places and .44 Mag and up makes sense, but I'm thinking from a purely "I'm screwed and have no other choice" scenario.
I've read a bunch of the bear defense threads and did quite a bit of research on the subject. Almost always it's said that if you have to shoot a charging bear, your only hope is for a good shot into the brain pan. This being the case, wouldn't .357 Mag be just as good as the larger .44 Mag and up calibers? Or, do the larger calibers offer some better effect in the case you miss the head?
I guess my train of thought is that .357 Mag would penetrate the skull fine (with a good hardcast load) and do the required damage and allow faster follow up shots (if you ever got any).
Now, if I was hunting bear, I would be looking to shoot other places and .44 Mag and up makes sense, but I'm thinking from a purely "I'm screwed and have no other choice" scenario.