Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Question regarding Border Security

Discussion in 'Legal' started by TX1911fan, Jun 12, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. TX1911fan

    TX1911fan Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2006
    Messages:
    2,013
    An idea came up in a discussion with a friend of mine. He suggested that the Federal Government hire private security guards to arrest and detain illegals crossing the southern border. We went back and forth on the reasons why that would make any more sense than just hiring more border guards, but one thing we couldn't resolve on our own was this. Could a private security guard hired by the Federal government legally arrest and detain a suspected illegal alien, and use deadly force in performing their duties? Does anyone have any comments on this?
     
  2. atlctyslkr

    atlctyslkr Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2006
    Messages:
    477
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    How would this be any different than the private armed security that is in some Federal buildings? I don't know where the actual statue is but I'm sure somewhere it is written in to law about use of private security.
     
  3. HankB

    HankB Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2003
    Messages:
    5,213
    Location:
    Central Texas
    The government hires private security firms all the time. But as for border security, there's a part of the U. S. Constitution which looks suggestive.

    Article 1, Section 8 grants Congress the power:

    "To declare war, grant letters of marque and reprisal, and make rules concerning captures on land and water;"​

    and

    "To provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions;"​

    IANAL, but by my plain reading of the Constitution, hiring private security for border patrol ("grant letters of marque") or calling out the militia (to "repel invasions") looks OK.
     
  4. Freddymac

    Freddymac Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    285
    We should put bounties on them

    Alive, of course, but we should pay citizens to caputure illegals and detain them:D
     
  5. AJAX22

    AJAX22 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2005
    Messages:
    1,161
    If there was money in it, I'd go do it as a summer job. I'd like to do it for free, but as a student I have to keep an eye on the bottom line.
     
  6. rustymaggot

    rustymaggot Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2005
    Messages:
    838
    if someone comes to our country illegally then they should not be counted as a person. no rights. i think we should form a hunting club and raffle off hunting licences. get people to pay for the chance to sit out at the fence with a rifle. sell hotdogs and beer. sell " big fence hunting club" tee-shirts.
     
  7. Thefabulousfink

    Thefabulousfink Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    1,506
    Location:
    Spokane, WA
    Historically, when a kingdom has to rely on mercenaries to gaurd its borders, things are going badly.:uhoh:
     
  8. MICHAEL T

    MICHAEL T Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2004
    Messages:
    6,011
    Location:
    outback Kentucky
    We have the manpower all ready. Their sitting in Airports bothering Marines in uniform and old folks . Pull these over paid rent a cops out of the airports and put on the boarder. Who knows they might catch a real terrorist. :what: They would be more use on border than in the Airports wasting tax payers money stealing nail clippers .
     
  9. crazed_ss

    crazed_ss Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2005
    Messages:
    1,652
    Location:
    Sunny San Diego
    No we shouldnt.
    First of all.. How will you tell and illegal Mexican from a citizen born in on US Soil? What happens when one of these bounty hunters tries to "apprehend" a citizen who is mistaken for an illegal and the bounty hunter gets shot in the face?

    Bounty Hunters and Mercanies = Bad idea.
     
  10. crazed_ss

    crazed_ss Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2005
    Messages:
    1,652
    Location:
    Sunny San Diego
    Stuff like this is constantly posted, yet people here still wonder why gun owners are stereotyped as violent and backwards hicks and hillbillies. I guess stereotypes truly do exist for a reason.
     
  11. crazed_ss

    crazed_ss Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2005
    Messages:
    1,652
    Location:
    Sunny San Diego
    These guys work along with DHS employees at the Port of Entry here in San Diego. http://www.usprotect.com/ They carry pistols so I assume they're authorized to use deadly force if needed.
     
  12. HankB

    HankB Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2003
    Messages:
    5,213
    Location:
    Central Texas
    I'd agree if we were hiring commandos from, say, Germany (Hessians!?) to do the job, but would we really be hiring mercenaries in the traditional sense if the country is paying its own citizens to do a job that needs doing?
     
  13. seeker_two

    seeker_two Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    3,616
    Location:
    Deep in the Heart of the Lone Star State (TX)
    I like the idea of bounties, but catching them on your own brings up a lot of legal problems.... :uhoh:

    Do it like "Crimestoppers" tip lines. Call them in and, if the tip leads law enforcement to actual illegals, you get a reward.

    No anonymous calls, of course.... :D
     
  14. Thefabulousfink

    Thefabulousfink Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    1,506
    Location:
    Spokane, WA
    HankB, the general differnece between a professional soldier and a mercenary is a soldier loyal to their country. They have been instilled with ideas of duty, honor, and commitment. Most soldiers are willing to lay down their lives because they know that they are protecting their families and countrymen.

    Mercenaries are employees. They may or may not be loyal to the country they are gaurding, but at the end of the day they are doing it for a paycheck. The number one rule when fighting for a paycheck is be alive to spend it. Mercenaries may be well trained and fierce fighters, but they typically only fight hard enough to not dishonor their company. When faced with laying down their lives to complete an objective, they have very little incentive.

    Look at the Romans, the Swiss and other mercenaries in the Thirty Years War, the Hessians, and various other mercenary groups used by third world countries in this last century.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page