Ramp and Throat Job

Status
Not open for further replies.
I agree that in the general definition, a revolver is "more reliable" than an automatic; but...
I have noticed over the years that while a mass produced automatic is occasionaly subject to "jams" requiring Immediate Action by the shooter, at a loss of 2 to 10 seconds in shooting; when a revolver quits, it is usually out of action until the right tools can be found and applied.
 
Folks, you have no idea of what a botched ramp job will cost you, including a trip to the hospital...

IN the old IPSC days when there were a few great smiths.. and LONG waiting lists... a lot of guys just had to try...... and we watched people go through all kinds of nightmares including the fellow that had a bunch of brass and hot gass pass out of the back of the area where the barrel and slide meet.. and straight into his eyes....

People, not worth it, have someone seriously qualified do it!!

Go to an IPSC match or IDPA and ask around for advise on current gun smithes...

Or even pick up Handgunner magazine, although there are a few less then reputable smiths advertising in there... :/
 
Request of 1911 Tuner

Under cover of the general caveat that there is no such thing as a stupid question (I hope), I was wondering if you (or someone) would post some pix of same angles of a WELL DONE polishing job?

I have just gotten interested in handguns this last year, and I realize there is a lot to learn. I have purchased a SA Mil-Spec 1911 and read about all the customizing tricks that can be done to enhance reliability, etc. It would help me and maybe other newbies to be able to compare right and wrong-side by side. Not that I would attempt to do it myself, but so that I could begin to recognize the real thing if and when I see it.

:confused:
 
Over Tuning the 1911

I have only been shooting 1911 pistols for about six months and I have been overwhelmed with all the advice that you see posted by so called experts on how to make them better. There are a few real experts like Tuner (Experience, skill, knowledge, with the right tools and gages) and a lot of hacks. The trouble is that if you are a new guy searching for knowledge it is hard to judge who to listen to. Sometimes it is even easy for the uninitiated to get suckered by a charlatan "gunsmith" face to face.

Now to what I want to say: I think that John Moses Browning set out to design a pistol that was powerful and reliable in all battlefield conditions. The 1911 was just such a pistol. He was also a tooling and manufacturing genius. He designed guns for a purpose that could be pratically and efficiently manufactured for that purpose. The 1911 pistol was designed for ease of manufacture without a lot of hand fitting and polishing. It was designed to tolerate mud, dust, water etc with only cursory attention. That required loose clearences (not Kalashnikov loose but loose nevertheless) with practcal tolerances.

Then a cult developed to turn his creation into a big bore target punching wonder. To achieve this all the tolerances were tightened and clearences were reduced. That tended to make the 1911 into something that JMB never envisioned. It also tended to make it a finicky wonder that became the subject of constant attention and fussing. The experts could make these refined toys run but the guy looking for the perfect blend of reliability and super tight groups fell prey to the heretics of basement gunsmithing. We have been struggling ever since as we polish, tune and tighten JMB's wonder into a prima donna pistol...Save us Tuner before we dremmel again. :banghead:
 
Last edited:
RAMP RAMP RAMP

I've got this range box, nice laminate, cool mounts and it holds 6 1911 style pistols. Needless to say I like to shoot them. All .45 cal.
Only one has a ramp job. Don't know who did it, but it sure is pretty. It was the first pistol in the 1911 style I bought.
It's selling point was the ramp job. The seller at the table in Pamona, Ca. showed it to me, then demonstrated it's ability to load 7 fired rounds of empty brass. They all chambered with out a hitch. Impressed I bought it. Since this purchase in 1982 it has continued to work flawlessly.[
Over the years as I see ones I like I buy and shoot them, some I keep, some are sold rather quickly, either I don't like them or a friend likes them $50.00 better than I. In our circle we have agreed to a $50.00 profit margin amongst us.
NONE of the other keepers I have, has had any ramp work done. Most will not feed empties........... So what.
The #6 slot was just filled with a Para Ord. 4.5" LTD with the super exctracter. In 3 sessions I have fired 1000 rounds through this weapon. Not a Single jam.
I buy bulk usgi magazines, and other than the sharp edges when loading them they work great.
The Para single stack handles and shoots well. The finish sucks, the part that sticks it to the metal must have been omitted, 'cuz it's just fallling off.
MY EXPERIENCE says leave the ramps alone, if they don't work sell 'em.
/B]
 
1911Tuner said:
I'm in the camp that believes that mirror polishing of feed ramps can actually be detrimental to reliability...and I only rarely do any polishing there at all... beyond addressing any obvious deep tool marks...and then only with emery or crocus cloth on a fingertip.
Tuner, would you please explain why you believe this to be the case? I would have thought that a mirror-polish on a feedramp is a good thing :confused:
 
re:

Sometimes it is...Sometimes it ain't. Due to a misunderstanding of the "Whys" and "Wheretofores"...the question was asked here:

http://forum.m1911.org/showthread.php?t=26657

And a fairly good explanation ensued. Most feed ramp polishing is unnecessary, and often done because it's expected. Correctly done, it won't hurt anything, and can enhance reliability...but incorrectly done, it can turn a reliable pistol into a pukin' buzzard in short order. If the frame ramp is to spec and proper magazines are used, it's not necessary, as the pistol will feed pretty much any reasonable ammunition that you can stuff into the magazine. A popular myth that's been around for years is that the old pistols...USGI and commercial Colts...won't function with anything except hardball unless they undergo a radical modification of the frame and barrel ramps...and it's just that. A myth. The pistols that refuse to do it are very likely either badly worn out, or are "Gunshow Specials" that have been thrown together from a gaggle of Who-Hit-John mismatched or out of spec parts...and many of those would have, had the "smith" refrained from doing a "Ramp and Throat" job because the 1911 pistol is a "Controlled Feed" design.

Controlled feed requires a certain amount of frictional resistance at several points on the cartridge. If things are too slick...and the frame ramp isn't dead on 31 degrees...that resistance is compromised...and so is controlled feed.

Going a little further:

Another common misconception is that the barrel ramp...commonly and incorrectly referred to as the "Throat"...is an extension of the feed ramp. It's not.

The barrel ramp isn't a bullet guide. It's a clearance. The bullet nose shouldn't touch it at any point below the top corner, where it becomes chamber. If the feed ramp is to spec...and proper magazines are used...and the barrel ramp is to spec...the bullet ogive skids across the corner and the cartridge places a downward force on the barrel as it breaks over to horizontal. This serves two purposes. It holds the barrel down on the frame bed, making the angle of entry into the chamber less acute, and it prevents the barrel from being pushed forward by the slide pushing on the cartridge.

When the barrel moves forward, it also moves UP-ward. If it moves upward too early, the lugs try to engage the lugs and slots in the slide. The lug corners are put into a bind...front barrel lug corners to rear slide lug corners...and everything usually comes to a halt because of the forward force on the slide and the upward force of the barrel causes a wedging action to occur. The cartridge is caught between the barrel ramp corner and the chamber roof. The slide keeps pushing, forcing the barrel harder upward, and our old friend, the "Three-Point Jam" is upon us, complete with the tell-tale mark on the side of the case.
 
WOW! Great Info

That post is chocked full of info, I'm impressed. I printed it off so I can take it to my gun bench and staple it to the wall for refence as I work the action on my .45's. It gives a feller alot to ponder, and whatch the parts as a round chambers.
Thanx for that info, I may never alter any thing with the info, but I'll sure understand why alot of the guys in the pistol club have all the jamming problems and cussing fits during a shoot.
 
Any 3 point jam advice? I have a base model Witness 10mm that had the usual sharp chamber edges on it. I was getting occasional jams so I eased them a tiny bit. I also polished the integral feed ramp. I occasionally. 3 or 4 per hundred, get the 3 point jamming and it's about the only issue I have left. I moved up to 5% Wolff mag springs, I'm thinking I may want to order some 10% for they are a no touch "possible" fix. What say the gurus.

I moved down from 20 lb wolff spring to 18 pound spring and it improved, but I still get these three point jams enough not to carry this hunking thing. Man, 15+1 of 180s and 33oz pistol make it a workout weight? ;) It's my woods gun, BTW. Handloads are worse, but it happens on factory ammo too. I know, you are the 1911 tuner, but any advice is helpful. I'm not super attached to this gun and it's price point does not make me want to take it to a gunsmith. I didn't go crazy by any means and did not alter the feed ramp into the chamber as so feared in the 10mm case due to high pressure. Never had any bulging or what not FYI.

Anyhoo, any advice on where to start? I think it may still be hanging up at 12:00 on the top of the chamber, but is some more easing here best, or maybe a little off the chamber part of the ramp, which is essentially untouched beside some flitz polish and a few fleeting moments with a dremel, probably less. Less is more as they say, and I have been ultra careful not to overdo it. I wish I had a range in my back yard.

I have been very careful, but admittedly, I don't have any angle measuring equipment. That said, if pics will help, please ask. If you don't work on stinking witnesses, that's okay too. Just looking around for helpful hints. I know these pistols will run well, but I also know, like the 1911, they can have their woes. Thankfully, it's not a high dollar gun, so I'm willing to learn and not willing to overdo it. I like my face just the way it is, thank you. Safety first, reliability last. On this one at least. I have a compact 45 for CCW that gobbles up everything. It's not a 1911 unfortunately.

Less is more, as I stated. I'm just trying to fix the right problem first, not last. You understand tuner, I'm sure of that.

jeepmor
 
Sorry my response is a wee bit tardy :eek: but thank you, Tuner - I can just about see the movie in my mind's eye ;)
 
Well, I had someone bring me a bubbafied 1911 to fix today. It appears to have the same problem. Here are some pics. Is there anything I can do for it? Its a Springfield and I noticed the feed ramp is a part of the barrel.
When you try to load it, the rounds "nose down" and get stuck on the feed ramp. I tried it with my Colt mags and Wilson Combat, and the factory mags that came with it. Same problem. Its pretty well worn.

Is there anything I can do for him? He helped me meet my wife, so I kind of owe him one.





 
turner is right sometimes it may take in mag arms 0.05 inch - 0.12 inch to get a good feed i had to do that with some "Chicago typewriters" Thompson's but like my instructor told me don't fix something that is not broke
 
looks like either an ametur job or the guy just got a little too carried away,

also anytime you remove that much metal you can comprimise the intregrity of the chamber, this is just a job left to people who know what thier doing

whats that old saying "measure twice and cut once"
 
that is A-W-F-U-L! did he think he was working on a crack pipe? or just using it as one. geesh. i always kind of thought polishing was supposed to GENTLY smooth machining marks out, not remove a portion of the gun.
 
I think I might also be the victim of a poor polishing job as I keep getting the 3 point jam with otherwise very reliable S&B FMJ. Changed to a heavier spring, tried different ammo, Wilson mags...etc. How much space between the barrel and the feed ramp should exist? Im at about 1/16 with the barrel pushed back against the frame.
 
The point of this thread was to show how badly a ramp and/or throat job can be botched. My removing metal and changing shapes or angles you can quickly render a handgun into a heap of junk. although, there does seem to be a thread within a thread here. Simply polishing a ramp should never entail removing metal or changing physical aspects of the gun.

I have been polishing the ramps of every semi-auto I have ever owned, and those of the people who know me and have never had a problem. Almost every mass produced semi-auto will have machine marks and imperfections that can cause feeding issues. A case in point would be my latest Ruger LCP... The slide would not go into full battery when chambering the first round when using truncated cone or hollow point rounds. The cause was slight machining imperfections in the surface of the ramp. The solution was - like all my semi-autos -to polish the ramp and the result was perfect feeding and cycling.

Anyone who is not an experienced gun smith should never try to change physical aspects of a weapon, but I hardly think that "polishing" is regarded as "changing" a gun.
 
"For another, the bottom of the barrel ramp isn't supposed to match the top of the feed ramp...feathered or not. It should sit slightly forward...a minimum of .030-.035 inch. It can be a little more...but not less.

The problem with working on barrel ramps is that you can easily cut the top corner too deep into the chamber and undermine head support. Not a huge issue if the headspace is at or near minimum and downloaded ammo is used...or at least no hotter than factory hardball spec...but it often only takes a little too much to be way too much."

Thanks for that good information, Tuner. You obviously have a lot of hard earned experience with correcting ones that have been done badly.

What is the cure for this ? To cut the frame for a ramped barrel and buy an expensive barrel ? Or is there an equally effective correction that wouldn't cost that much ?
 
IF the barrel was not boogered up to match, EGW can fix the frame. They make a ramp insert to fit a pocket milled into the wallowed out ramp. Works on steel, first choice on aluminum. $40, plus shipping and installation if you don't have local support. They will also weld up and remachine a steel frame's ramp area for $60 plus shipping.

If the barrel is ruined, you have the choice of replacing the barrel with standard and rebuilding the frame ramp as above or just going to an integral ramp barrel. Those can work pretty well IF you don't have the case support phobia and are willing to make it the same angle and depth as standard. I have a couple of Springfield 9mms that had to have that done to convert their integral ramps into feed ramps. They shoot fine and do not blow up.
 
Ugly ugly pics !!!

Why do people think they NEED a rotary tool to do a ramp an throat job????? I was blessed with growing up with a excellent custom rifle an pistol builder who i shot an hunted with for many many years . He was a Korean combat vet so when it came to a 1911 i really paid close attention to what he said . As for the remarks about people not wanting ramp an throat jobs on pistols of 50-60-70's has more to do with the fact that most people only shot 230gr ball ammo in 1911s . Suprisingly that just happens to be what the GREAT JOHN BROWNING designed the pistol to feed an function with. The sport of Bullseye shoot was really big in the 50's an so people started to tighten up the frame slide fit along with bushing , slide an barrel fit . Jim Clark an some other smiths of the time actually made slide barrel sets that were in .38 special as with a 148 gr hollow base wadcutter was the most accurate bullet of the time due to it being able to expand at the base of the slug an grip the rifling extremely well . so bullseye shooting is actually what started most of the reliability thing as was the introduction of many new styles of bullets to enhance stopping power for law enforcement . i was taught to due this by hand an at a very slow pace . with the barrel in the full rear position there should be a gap .050 to .075 its going to be different as to the best gap for each individual gun an also the sharp edge of the chamber /throat crest should be de-burred with a hand held hook style de-burring tool just on the bottom 60 degrees or ramp width. NO ROTARY TOOLS HERE!!! the de-burr should be very slight as to much can cause case rupture with +p ammo !!!!! SO NOT TO MUCH!! Best advice is if you dont know DON'T TOUCH!!!! This information is for educational use only !!!! Last thing for polishing the ramp a piece of 7/16 hard wood dowel is very helpful to keep the the radius in the frame an please only use 600 grit wet sand paper to start 2000 grit to finish .
 
Last edited:
I know this post is for attention on over polishing ramps and barrels but I'm surprised no one pointed out most feed problems are caused by; 1. magazine feed lip angles and release point, 2. slide stop angles and bevels (3 point jams), 3. extractor fit (number 1 cause of feed problems in my opinion.
The older I get the worse that factory barrel ramp machining marks get. I like polished ramps because done properly they can't hurt. Those darn machining marks can cause problems though. You must remove the cutting marks first then polish, if you just polish cutter marks you still have ridges they are just polished.
 
I'm surprised no one pointed out most feed problems are caused by;

It's been covered. Trust me... ;)

The older I get the worse that factory barrel ramp machining marks get.


I've noticed exactly the opposite in most modern pistols. They're actually quite smooth and don't need any polishing at all. The biggest thing that I've seen in regards to feed function is the ramp angles themselves...frame and barrel...are all wrong.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top