Ranchers decry U.S. 'occupying force'

Status
Not open for further replies.

2dogs

Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
1,865
Location
the city
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=31516

Ranchers decry U.S. 'occupying force'
Forming group to press for Border Patrol reforms, protect property

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: March 14, 2003
1:00 a.m. Eastern



© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com


Calling the U.S. Border Patrol an "occupying force," owners of ranches along the frontier with Mexico have formed a new association to resolve grievances and help officials bolster national security.

The Border Land Association in an attempt to strengthen cooperation with U.S. agents, said Laredo, Texas, rancher Gene Walker, who serves as the group's president.

"Historically, border landowners have been citizen volunteers, working with the USBP and others to ensure that our nation is safe and secure," he said.

Walker charges, however, that "over the past four years – long before September 11 – the USBP has begun to act like an 'occupation force,' ignoring, not only private property rights, but repudiating the assistance that landowners can provide – and have previously provided – to help control illegal entry into Texas."

Consequently, Walker said, "landowners have begun to fear the USBP's practices more than they fear the illegal aliens crossing their land."

In a statement, Walker listed examples of alleged Border Patrol practices:


Agents have constructed roads and "drag lines" and installed wireless monitors without landowner permission;

Agents and pilots have used helicopters, fixed-wing aircraft and vehicles, to chase and harass wildlife, livestock, property owners, ranch employees and commercial hunting clients;

Agents have destroyed private roads, fences and gates, and replaced private locks on gates with government locks, barring owners, employees and guests from entering – and sometimes exiting – their own property;

Agents leave gates open and cut fences, allowing livestock to wander onto roadways or other pastures where they could mix with livestock of different ownership or genetics, causing enormous potential expense to ranchers;

Agents on horse patrol ignore the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Fever Tick Quarantine Zone and regulations, endangering herds of livestock and placing significant ranch investment at precarious risk.
Walker said that many landowners have tried to negotiate conduct agreements with the Border Patrol but have been rejected by agents and supervisors.

He said that after these individual efforts failed, the Border Land Association was formed to bring change through political action.

"The Border Land Association was not created to dwell on past incidents, but to lay the groundwork for better cooperation and stronger national security," Walker said. "With the recent formation of the Homeland Security Department, we have an unprecedented opportunity to help restructure and reform the fundamental policies of the USBP, enlisting – instead of alienating – the citizens it is trying to protect."

Walker said there are many issues to address, but changing the patrol's measure of performance, which he calls a disincentive, is a top priority.

"Rewarding border patrol sectors for apprehending more aliens is backward," he said.

"If a sector successfully deters crossings, its apprehension numbers go down, and the successful efforts of those agents aren't recognized," Walker explained. "On the other hand, a high level of apprehensions indicates a high number of crossings, and the system rewards sectors that allow illegal aliens to enter the country initially."

Walker said he wants to prevent border properties from being turned into a vast "chasing ground."

"Regardless of motivation, all illegal aliens have one thing in common – they cross an international border," he said. "Deterring them from entering the U.S. certainly seems more effective than having to catch them once they get here."
 
It's just possible that this organization misunderstands the Government's true agenda here: to dissolve the borders and increase the flow of cheap labor and impressionable voters. Still, seeking "cooperation" is an honorable ideal.
 
They need to get video and photos of the actitivities by these federal agents.

The Homeleand defense bounces us, in and out different threat levels.

But along the border it's business as usual.

There is only one person to blame.. the Prez

waterdog
 
At some point it may dawn on these folks that the people they are appealing to aren't on their side... What goes on on the border happens by design, not by accident. There is only ONE member of Congress who has truly put himself on the line regarding this issue--that's Tom Tancredo of CO--and he was told by Karl Rove "never to darken the door of the White House again." (That's a direct quote from Mr. Tancredo). Sad but true.
 
Wonder what the greivances would sound like if the military were posted at the border. Sounds like the .gov groups can tend to be a little heavy handed.
 
In theory I agree with the sentiment (gov’t agency gets in the way of private property owners). I would suggest that everybody that calls for a military presence on the border and for increased detention measures take this concept to heart. As I have said time and again, the more gov’t presence there is on the border (military or otherwise) the more impact it will have on private property owners. You really can’t have things both ways. However, Gene Walker is an idiot and needs to figure out what he’s talking about before he opens his mouth. Some of what he said is flat out incorrect and some is not exactly the real truth.
 
Sorry about just now responding to you. I took (and am still taking) a little vacation so I hadn’t read your question until now. Anyway…

The first thing I can tell you that is a flat out lie (in actuality it is probably more just Walker’s ignorance than willful lying), is his comments about “rewards†based on apprehensions instead of deterrence. I believe I detailed some of this in another thread, but I’ll try to summarize it here. Under Clinton/Reno policy changed to a deterrence focus instead of apprehension. In fact, agents are openly praised by management for low numbers. I’ll avoid my personal rant on this issue and just say that Walker doesn’t have a clue about how things are done and if he did he would know that matters are actually the exact opposite of what he said. As to his other points, I’ll just say that anytime you have an agency with thousands of agents there are bound to be some mistakes, some the fault of the BP some not. The important thing is to determine if such mistakes are common, encouraged, or “winked†at. I can tell you quite strongly that they are not. In fact, as far as I am aware, anytime an agent inadvertently locks out a rancher, or busts a fence or whatnot, steps are taken to rectify things. I can also assure you that there are indeed occasions where fences have been broken or gates left open or something else of that nature. Let me explain by way of example. Suppose you have a new agent, a little overeager and perhaps not totally sure of surrounding property lines and pastures. He cuts some sign along the border and begins to track a group. After five miles, he begins to think he is getting real close. Based on various “clues†he also thinks they might be carrying heavy loads of dope and soon, based on signs, he feels they are less than 30 minutes in front of him. Following this groups tracks, he comes across a local ranchers land and notices that the gate the illegals went through is open. Following the “rule of the ranchâ€, he also passes through this gate and leaves it the way he found it, open. Sure enough about half an hour to forty-five minutes later he apprehends his group and low and behold they have a LARGE stash of dope on them. Excited about all of this he “does his thing†and never even thinks about the gate he went through and whether or not it should have been open. Perhaps a more “seasoned†agent would have known that that particular gate is an outside boundary fence and would have gone ahead and shut it for the rancher. Of course, even the most seasoned of agents can’t always know the proper status of random gates on random ranches so he also can fail to shut a gate that should be. I could change this example from a gate to a cut fence. In that situation the rancher should be notified but perhaps the new agent in his eagerness forgot about it, or he couldn’t even tell in the dark that he went through a fenceline. The point I am getting at it that the BP takes great pains to work with local ranchers and by and large the local ranchers work with the BP. The vast, vast majority of the time something happens to a ranchers land, it is not the BP that did it but rather the illegals. At worst, the BP inadvertently neglected to notify the rancher. And that’s at worst.
 
They need to get video and photos of the actitivities by these federal agents.

The Homeleand defense bounces us, in and out different threat levels.

But along the border it's business as usual.

There is only one person to blame.. the Prez

waterdog

I have been think about this too. I wonder if some pictures got sent to the New York Times or The Washington Post if this would get people to wake up about what is going on the border.
:banghead:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.