Range Report: S&W Model 28 w/6 " Barrel...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Stephen A. Camp

Moderator In Memoriam
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
2,430
Hello. Normally I shoot primarily automatics but continue to have a fondness for revolvers and some revolvers in particular; such is the case for me with N-frame Smith & Wesson's.

Realizing that surely and steadily S&W revolvers are "evolving" from their traditional S&W "look", I've been eager to add to my meager collection of S&W revolvers in general and N-frames in particular. I much prefer no locks and the older look.

At a recent gun show, I was able to do this. A trade here and there and a most reasonable amount of cash resulted in my getting a like new Model 64 with 3" barrel and a 6 " Model 28. The latter is the topic of this review.

The Revolver: The gun has an "S-Prefix" serial number and is not as old as my 4", which has the screw in front of the trigger guard. I'd estimate this one to be about 96 to 98% though it did have a very slight ding here and there. Also present was a minor amount of holster wear. The screws were not buggered up and the yoke/crane fit was great and has no play. Timing was fine with the cylinder positively locking before the
hammer falls in DA and before full-cock position is complete in SA. There is no push-off with the hammer from full-cock. There is minimal movement in the cylinder when locked. The previous owner had painted the front sight blade red. I personally prefer plain black-on-black but have not removed the paint yet.

f6d15e11.jpg

This Model 28 has the "classic" S&W "look", one that I find appealing. More importantly, these revolvers normally shoot extremely well in my experience.

This revolver came with a pair of the smooth S&W "coke bottles" that were very clean and certainly useable, but I replaced them with a pair of the now-discontinued Fitz "Gunfighter" grips. I find these exceptionally comfortable.

Ammunition: One handload and four factory loads were fired through the revolver:

158-gr. CSWC
8.0-gr. Unique
Federal SP primer
New Starline Cases

Remington 125-gr. Golden Saber

Federal 125-gr. JHP

Winchester 145-gr. Silvertip

Speer 158-gr. Gold Dot Hollow Point


Additionally, 12 rounds of each load were fired 10' from my chronograph screens to provide the following average velocities, extreme spreads, and standard deviations:

158-gr. Handload:
Average Velocity: 1215 ft/sec
Extreme Spread: 45
Std. Deviation: 17

Remington 125-gr. Golden Saber:
Average Velocity: 1282
Extreme Spread: 55
Std. Deviation: 19

Federal 125-gr. JHP:
Average Velocity: 1358
Extreme Spread: 75
Std. Deviation: 29

Winchester 145-gr. Silvertip:
Average Velocity: 1270
Extreme Spread: 54
Std. Deviation: 19

Speer 158-gr. Gold Dot Hollow Point:
Average Velocity: 1117
Extreme Spread: 76
Std. Deviation: 27


Shooting: This was done seated and I used a rest. My goal was to see just how tightly the gun might shoot with a few loads and I'm just not good enough to see otherwise.

Once the gun was sighted in, shooting for groups was done at 25 and 50 yards. The only shots at closer ranges were to adjust the sights.

f6c723c9.jpg

I think I've found an inexpensive cast bullet load that works plenty good enough in this particular revolver. These 12 shots were fired at 25 yards. It is accurate and has enough punch to handle anything I might encounter here in Texas. Mainly, it will "encounter" paper, but I might try for a deer with this gun soon.

f6c72313.jpg

Winchester's 145-gr. STHP was no slouch on paper, either. At 25 yards it grouped more than adequately for me. One nice thing about revolvers is that if they're in good shape, a shooter can get very fine accuracy.

f6c72316.jpg

At 50 yards, Speer's 158-gr. GDHP hit just a bit too the left and high. At closer ranges, its groups overlapped with the others.

Bullet Expansion: Two rounds were fired into water in an informal expansion test. I do not have the coin for ballistic gelatin nor do I have a means of shooting it at a constant temperature each time a test is to be performed. Most of us have seen the full-power 125-gr. JHP's that are often suggested as effective "manstoppers" but I decided to try the attenuated Remington 125-gr. Golden Saber and the Winchester Silvertip today.

f6c723e2.jpg

As can be seen, the Winchester 145-gr. STHP fragmented at an average velocity of 1270 ft/sec when impacting water while the 125-gr. Golden Saber did not at 1282 ft/sec. Normally there is some jacket slippage in the Golden Sabers when fired into water, but I've seen very little of it in actual tissue from javelina to deer in calibers 9mm and .45 ACP. Water exaggerates the "fragmentation potential" as it more easily gets between the jacket and the lead core of the bullet. When shooting super-saturated newsprint I see much less tendency toward fragmentation or jacket separation. Be that as it may, the Silvertip still penetrated approximately 3" deeper than the Golden Saber. In my opinion, either would make a capable defense load, but the Golden Saber has noticeably less felt recoil than the other loads fired for this report. The STHP expanded bullet measured 0.52 x 0.43 x 0.29" tall and the recovered weight was 105.8 grains. The GS measured 0.61 x 0.59 x 0.36" tall and weighed 124.4 grains.

Observations: There was not much felt recoil with any of the ammo shot today. The N-frame S&W revolvers may be called "boat anchors" by those preferring lighter weight, but at the firing line I find their
generous size and heft an advantage.

I do not know if Speer envisions their 158-gr. Gold Dot as a defense load and has it more lightly loaded for recoil management, but I was genuinely surprised at its barely breaking 1100 ft/sec. The Federal 125-gr. JHP and Winchester 145-gr. STHP had the sharpest "kick" though neither were "bad" in my estimation.

The groups shown were the best ones I shot and are not representative of my typical abilities. Exceptionally pleasing is that they do indicate that this particular revolver can group plenty well and is not "picky", showing a distinct preference of one load over another, at least not in today's somewhat limited ammunition menu.

f6c723bf.jpg

It didn't take long for the Model 28 to get dirty...especially with the cast bullet loads. (This thing is death on falling plates....)

I don't foresee this as a defensive handgun at all, but I would not be hesitant to use it for such if push came to very hard shove. Having spent the best years of my life in police service, I went in harm's way more than a few times and practiced firearm skills accordingly. I still do the "practical" type shooting, but my deadly force concerns now have shrunk to simply include protecting me and mine from unlawful deadly aggression.
Fun is waaaaaaaaaaaay on the top of my list and with each passing year I appreciate not having to pick up empty cases slung here and yon by whatever automatic I was using.

That does not mean that this revolver will not draw blood. I hope to shoot a deer with it in the near future...as well as others with yet other handguns, but I doubt that I'll be toting this revolver for anything more "serious."

With the AWB gone, at least for now, we see folks picking up standard capacity magazines and handguns so equipped. (They SHOULD have been able to legally do this all along.) There is nothing "wrong" with this at all and I own more than a few, but this might be a good time to pick up a clean, used S&W revolver. The old timers are getting harder to find with each passing year.

Just a thought...

Best.
 
Last edited:
Not a big deal but I don't think the 28 was offered with a 6.5 inch barrel. Should be 6 inch unless someone swapped on an early M27 tube. (Nope, just saw the pic showing the Highway Patrolman marking.)

Also, I'm not sure if the "Coke bottle" target grips that came on some 1950s S&Ws were made in smooth configuration. I could certainly be wrong but every set I have seen were checkered.

I find all of the velocities for the factory ammo somewhat disappointing. I'm afraid the lawyers have made the ammo companies cut back to the point where I'm not sure if we can rightly call them "magnums" any longer. The Rem 125s were only going 1282 FPS? I load 125 JHPs to 1250 from my 4 inch .38 Specials. This load came from a mid-1970s manual and causes no problems in my K frame S&Ws but recoil is a bit much in the J frames.

On recoil you noticed something I have also noted. Bullet weight has more effect than does velocity. A 158 at 800 feels heavier to me than a 110 at 1200.

Very nice group at 25 yards. I love it when the group is perfectly centered. Wish I could do it once in a while.
 
Hello and thanks for catching the bbl length error. I've corrected it now and appreciate your keen eye.

You are exactly correct; the grips were not original, but that's how it came.

The Remington GS load is sort of a mid-range load by design, I'm told. I suppose this is to make it more easy on recoil for the smaller .357 revolvers.

I do recall factory loads having more velocity in year's past, however.

Best.
 
Dear Mr. Camp, ...

...quite a great report, sir! Going out to the range trying out a new gun is one thing, but making a detailed, informative report about the session is quite another. It must be a lot of work actually - albeit a pleasant one...

Thanks for posting it, Mr. Camp.

The S&W M28 "Highway Patrolman" (what a cool name for a gun, eh?) is one of the models I miss the most in S&W's lineup. Its styling is what I regard as that of a "real" sidearm.

I wish they'd bring the original M28 back or at least a "modernized" version, perhaps in stainless-steel (M628 ?).

All the best.
 
Great writeup.

You know, some of these loads appear to be "slow" when compared to reports of their use in, say, Ruger GP100s.

First, I'd like to know what the barrel/cylinder gap on that gun is like. But that may not be it; look at these performance numbers from the Bufbore site on their 357s:

---------------------------------

http://www.buffalobore.com/ammunition/default.htm#357

Make special note of the Marlin 1894, 18.5 inch barrel velocities. Item 19C/20, supercedes 30-30 energies!!!

1. 3 inch S&W J frame

a. Item 19A/20-180gr. Hard cast LFN = 1302 fps
b. Item 19B/20-170gr. JHC (jacketed hollow cavity) = 1299 fps
c. Item 19C/20-158gr. Gold Dot = 1398 fps
d. Item 19D/20-125gr. Gold Dot = 1476 fps

2. 4 inch S&W L frame Mt. Gun

a. Item 19A/20-180gr. Hard cast LFN = 1375 fps
b. Item 19B/20-170gr JHC = 1411 fps
c. Item 19C/20-158gr. Gold Dot = 1485 fps
d. Item 19D/20-125gr. Gold Dot = 1603 fps

3. 5 inch S&W model 27

a. Item 19A/20-180gr. Hard Cast =1398 fps
b. Item 19B/20-170gr. JHC = 1380 fps
c. Item 19C/20-158gr. Gold Dot = 1457 fps
d. Item 19D/20-125gr. Gold Dot = 1543 fps

4. 6 inch Ruger GP 100

a. Item 19D/20-125gr. Gold Dot = 1707 fps

5. 18.5 inch Marlin 1894

a. Item 19A/20-180gr. Hard Cast = 1851 fps
b. Item 19B/20-170gr. JHC = 1860 fps
c. Item 19C/20-158gr. Gold Dot = 2153 fps---- Can you believe this?!!!
d. Item 19D/20-125gr. Gold Dot = 2298 fps---- Or this?!!!
----------------------------------

Jim again.

So what are we seeing here?

The 5" S&W 27 of more or less similar barrel and vintage to Stephen's gun is shooting slow, not just in comparison with the 6" Ruger over 150fps faster, but also the newer 4" barrel S&W - it's an inch shorter and 50fps faster?

So...there's something about those 27s and 28s that...shoot slow? Rifling pattern maybe? Gap size? It can't be the cylinder throats or it wouldn't be so accurate.

Odd, isn't it?

I'm also curious about whether or not a fire-lap job on the 28 followed by one of a number of "metal slicker" treatments such as spray-and-set moly might speed it up some?
 
A 6" Model 27-2 was the first hand gun I bought 30 yrs. ago. Still have it, still like it. Don't shoot it as much as some of my more recent acquisitions, but it is a great gun. Not surprised you like your Model 28. Same gun, different finish.
 
Can't say enough about the 28. In the past year I've added three of them to my collection (two 6" models, one 4" model). They're great duty guns which represent a look and style that's going away fast.
 
A 6" 28 was also my first centerfire handgun. My dad bought it for me when I was 18, but unfortunately it was stolen in a burglary a year or so later. I recently bought 4" and 6" Model 19's, and a 4" 28. The 19's are delightful, but there's just something about the 28...

It is massive, overbuilt, precision, and it locks up like a bank vault. To top it off, there's that matte blue that says "I was made to be used". If I had to grab one gun to hide in a closet with, it would be my 4" 28 because of it's heft and it's reassuring weight.

So thank you Mr. Camp for allowing me to recover some of the memories of that first 6" Model 28. It's been much appreciated, really truely.
 
Great report as always. I have a 4" Model 28 which wears a set of Herret's Shooting Star grips. It's really a fantastic gun.

There is nothing "wrong" with this at all and I own more than a few, but this might be a good time to pick up a clean, used S&W revolver. The old timers are getting harder to find with each passing year.

<grin> This reminds me of something Walt Rauch recently told me:

"Buy pinned and recessed N-Frames, they aren't making them anymore."
 
Hello and thank you all for your responses. I'm tickled that the post was of interest.

Best.
 
I chrono'd the Fed 357B load (125gr hp) back when they were sold in the red and white boxes, and IIRC, I got 1600+fps from my 6" M28, and a skosh over 2000(!!!!) from my 10" Contender. Now those were some loads.:D
 
Fitz Gunfighter Pistol Grips

It is nice of Steve Camp to appreciate the efforts of my 1919-1979 Fitz Pistol Grips and Ammo boxes company and his excellet Range reports are assisting my sale of the few archived grips remaining for Smith, Colt, Ruger and High Standards.

My Smiths are for the J, K-L and N frames and model 41, 46 and 52 target pistols.

The grips are Gunfighters (To assist police to shoot better), Target with thumb rest, Target with thumb rest and Palm Swell Plate we invented in 1924 and Olympic/ISSF/ISU grips.

The Same for Colts plus frontier models
Ruger for the 22 auto, Frontier models
High Standard 102-3-4 Target
In Walnut, Cherrywood and Duramite.

That is ALL and only a handful or less of each left.
Ask for e-mail flyer or picture of an individual grip.
Fitz Grips were sold worldwide until factory burnt in 79
There is only one remaining of some items.
I am not in business.

Paul
[email protected]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top