Monkeyleg
Member.
Caveat: anyone who's read my posts for the past year or so knows that I have a vested and somewhat monied interest in seeing independent gun stores survive.
And so do you, if you believe in being able to buy handguns, or Evil Black Rifles, or even ammunition.
There's a lot of 2nd Amendment purists here on THR, as well as hard-core "from my cold dead hands" types.
Maybe that's why keyboards are cheaper than guns. Or at least easier to buy.
When WalMart stops selling guns in CA, and Dick's takes over Galyan's and stops selling handguns, and K-Mart stops selling anything that Rosie O'Donnell objects to...aren't you hearing the message? Or is your tinfoil hat so thick that you can't hear the news?
Sportsmens Warehouse, Galyan's, Dick's, Gander Mountain, WalMart, KMart, and all of the other big discount chains are controlled by boards of directors who just ask the anti's when to bend over and how far. God forbid they should stand up for the Second Amendment.
Their only job is to use the Second when and if it pleases their customer base. If not, bye-bye.
I ask often for recommendations about quality gun shops all over the country, and for reasons that I hope most here understand.
The two most comments I hear are: great prices, but poor selection; or great selection, but high prices.
The two are mutually exclusive. You cannot run an independent store and deliver both.
Unless you run a discount chain like the ones mentioned above.
Of course, the discount stores can spread out the profits and losses across the coasts, meanwhile gouging people on every other item.
But what about the independent shop owner who carries compact .45's, or AK's, or--gasp!--Barrett .50's?
Well, if enough of you think it's worth saving a few bucks to frequent the discount stores, that independent will be out of business.
Soon.
And then where will you buy your handguns, or Evil Black Rifles. Or even your handgun ammo, should Rosie O prevail?
If any of you think I'm paranoid (and I know that at least Hunter Rose thinks so ), consider this: the anti's have re-examined their strategies and adjusted. We're still thinking of them in terms of what they did in the 1990's.
They're not trying to ban whole classes of guns. In fact, they're usually not even trying to ban any classes of guns.
What they're trying to do is ban the sale of certain guns.
Same outcome, but entirely different approach.
An approach that Sportsmens Warehouse, Galyans, Dick's, WalMart, KMart, and all the others will buy. It's piecemeal gun-grabbing, and those corporate types will abide that.
So, who's your friend? The corporate types who will undercut your local shop by $10? Or the independent shop owner who will continue to stock the guns that the anti's want to eventually ban?
Those who don't like smoking may not appreciate this analogy, but it's true: the hard-core anti-smokers didn't try to ban cigarrettes, but rather tried to reduce the areas where smokers could smoke, and the outlets where smokers could buy cigs.
The anti-smokers started long before the anti-gunners, and the anti-gunners learned a lot from the efforts.
Target used to sell cigarettes and ammunition; they don't now. KMart used to sell cigarettes and guns and ammunition; they don't now.
Is it worth it to you to save $10 or even $50 on a gun, knowing that the mega-mart store you bought it from may sell your rights down the river next year?
The absolute and only defenders of Second Amendment rights are the independent gun shop owners who respond to the anti's with a middle finger, and continue to sell the guns that you want.
It's your choice.
And so do you, if you believe in being able to buy handguns, or Evil Black Rifles, or even ammunition.
There's a lot of 2nd Amendment purists here on THR, as well as hard-core "from my cold dead hands" types.
Maybe that's why keyboards are cheaper than guns. Or at least easier to buy.
When WalMart stops selling guns in CA, and Dick's takes over Galyan's and stops selling handguns, and K-Mart stops selling anything that Rosie O'Donnell objects to...aren't you hearing the message? Or is your tinfoil hat so thick that you can't hear the news?
Sportsmens Warehouse, Galyan's, Dick's, Gander Mountain, WalMart, KMart, and all of the other big discount chains are controlled by boards of directors who just ask the anti's when to bend over and how far. God forbid they should stand up for the Second Amendment.
Their only job is to use the Second when and if it pleases their customer base. If not, bye-bye.
I ask often for recommendations about quality gun shops all over the country, and for reasons that I hope most here understand.
The two most comments I hear are: great prices, but poor selection; or great selection, but high prices.
The two are mutually exclusive. You cannot run an independent store and deliver both.
Unless you run a discount chain like the ones mentioned above.
Of course, the discount stores can spread out the profits and losses across the coasts, meanwhile gouging people on every other item.
But what about the independent shop owner who carries compact .45's, or AK's, or--gasp!--Barrett .50's?
Well, if enough of you think it's worth saving a few bucks to frequent the discount stores, that independent will be out of business.
Soon.
And then where will you buy your handguns, or Evil Black Rifles. Or even your handgun ammo, should Rosie O prevail?
If any of you think I'm paranoid (and I know that at least Hunter Rose thinks so ), consider this: the anti's have re-examined their strategies and adjusted. We're still thinking of them in terms of what they did in the 1990's.
They're not trying to ban whole classes of guns. In fact, they're usually not even trying to ban any classes of guns.
What they're trying to do is ban the sale of certain guns.
Same outcome, but entirely different approach.
An approach that Sportsmens Warehouse, Galyans, Dick's, WalMart, KMart, and all the others will buy. It's piecemeal gun-grabbing, and those corporate types will abide that.
So, who's your friend? The corporate types who will undercut your local shop by $10? Or the independent shop owner who will continue to stock the guns that the anti's want to eventually ban?
Those who don't like smoking may not appreciate this analogy, but it's true: the hard-core anti-smokers didn't try to ban cigarrettes, but rather tried to reduce the areas where smokers could smoke, and the outlets where smokers could buy cigs.
The anti-smokers started long before the anti-gunners, and the anti-gunners learned a lot from the efforts.
Target used to sell cigarettes and ammunition; they don't now. KMart used to sell cigarettes and guns and ammunition; they don't now.
Is it worth it to you to save $10 or even $50 on a gun, knowing that the mega-mart store you bought it from may sell your rights down the river next year?
The absolute and only defenders of Second Amendment rights are the independent gun shop owners who respond to the anti's with a middle finger, and continue to sell the guns that you want.
It's your choice.