Pigoutultra
Member
I hear regularly about how a bullet that "over-penetrates" is not as good in terms of stopping power as one that dumps all it's "energy" into the subject. It just seems ludicrous to me that anything but wound cavity would matter at all in arguments of "stopping power". Evidence of this is how people who are hit by cars that weigh thousands of pounds moving at 50 mph, certainly these dump much more "energy" into someone than a bullet, yet people still survive. Of course penetration is important, but only in minimum penetration, not "over-penetration". If a bullet penetrates deep enough to damage vital organs then it is effective as long as the wound cavity is sufficient. The only situation where "over-penetration" is a factor is where there is risk of collateral damage. I don't want this tread to be about shot placement either because that has little to do with the type of bullet or the cartridge used. Permanent wound cavity is the most important aspect of stopping power, a .30 Carbine bullet has more "energy" than a .45 ACP, yet the .45 ACP delivers more devastating wounds.
I apologize for going on a rant, I just felt like stirring up a discussion.
P.S. This argument isn't by any means complete, it's just there to get things rolling.
I apologize for going on a rant, I just felt like stirring up a discussion.
P.S. This argument isn't by any means complete, it's just there to get things rolling.
Last edited: