lizziedog1
Member
Does anyone else here think that the way recoil is decribed and reported in magazines and manuals is a bit exaggerated?
First let me say that I am not a particularly big or strong man. Call me average on both. Nor do I enjoy pain. I am the biggest sissy in the world when it comes to medical needles.
I was reading about guns almost as soon as I was able to read. I remember reading about those dreaded magnum handguns. 44 magnums could only be shot by men slightly stronger than Superman without suffering great bodily harm.
As young adult I bought a 44 magnum revolver. I would reload light loads, heavy loads, and everything in-between loads for it. Granted, some of the heavy loads had stiff recoil. They would not be my first choice for plinking loads. But, my wrist never broke, my face was never bloodied, the gun was never dropped, no harm at all ever came from shooting a 44 magnum.
The last couple of times I visited our local range I was given a chance to shoot a 338 magnum from the bench. Reading some of the stuff written about this cartridge would have you believe pulling the trigger would cause pain like being kick by a mule.
Again, the recoil was there. I wouldn't shoot boxes of 338 ammo at tin cans in the desert for fun. But I survived those shots quite nicely. Again, no bruises, broken bones, seperated joints or other maladies to report.
Do I like hard-kicking guns. Not really. The shotguns I use for bird hunting are autloaders. The main reason is that they soften recoil some. But it doesn't mean firing a single barrel 12 gauge would send me straight to the ER.
So, does anyone feel that recoil claims are exaggerated?
Why are they?
First let me say that I am not a particularly big or strong man. Call me average on both. Nor do I enjoy pain. I am the biggest sissy in the world when it comes to medical needles.
I was reading about guns almost as soon as I was able to read. I remember reading about those dreaded magnum handguns. 44 magnums could only be shot by men slightly stronger than Superman without suffering great bodily harm.
As young adult I bought a 44 magnum revolver. I would reload light loads, heavy loads, and everything in-between loads for it. Granted, some of the heavy loads had stiff recoil. They would not be my first choice for plinking loads. But, my wrist never broke, my face was never bloodied, the gun was never dropped, no harm at all ever came from shooting a 44 magnum.
The last couple of times I visited our local range I was given a chance to shoot a 338 magnum from the bench. Reading some of the stuff written about this cartridge would have you believe pulling the trigger would cause pain like being kick by a mule.
Again, the recoil was there. I wouldn't shoot boxes of 338 ammo at tin cans in the desert for fun. But I survived those shots quite nicely. Again, no bruises, broken bones, seperated joints or other maladies to report.
Do I like hard-kicking guns. Not really. The shotguns I use for bird hunting are autloaders. The main reason is that they soften recoil some. But it doesn't mean firing a single barrel 12 gauge would send me straight to the ER.
So, does anyone feel that recoil claims are exaggerated?
Why are they?