SKILCZ,
It contains more than you want to know, at this point, but we just went through a major thread on reflex sights, which includes both reflective and holographic types:
http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=439899&highlight=reflex. The major point was that non-reticle types can give fuzzy aiming dots, which is probably due to some kind of retinal "flare", while reticle types give cleaner looking dots (or triangles or whatever-you-want shape). The last posting has a link to an especially good background article, apparently by Oleg Volk:
http://www.thehighroad.org/showpost.php?p=5499179&postcount=52. Based on that, I think all holographic types are, effectively, reticle types. Volk also discusses the tube-type versus the "heads-up" or compact type reflex sights. Which do you prefer?
To your question. There are any number of Chinese-made reflex sights are available new for $40. On the THR Trading Post/Accessories, there are some knock-off Aimpoints for ~ $80. Some good usage reports.
The ~$200 Burris Fastfire compact type is what I have experience with, and I don't like it due to too bright dot and no reticle (fuzziness of dot). Other people love 'em and use them all the time. Maybe I just got a bad one.
My point: If I don't like the full-priced Burris, I am probably not going to like any of its knock-offs. There are lots of different variations and choices. You could get a good knock-off (i.e., does everything just as well as the full-priced original) and still not like it. But if you sort out what you like about the various choices within the full-priced originals, and you get a decent copy, you'll probably be happy. I don't know how to tell you to sort out what you like about the various choices within the full-priced originals. That's the problem.
But you came to the right place. If THR can't do it, can't nobody can.