Reliability - current production Kahr PM9 or PM40 - opinions?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Everything I have heard about the Kahr PM9 so far is that it is a range gun.
"hundreds of rounds without a hitch, etc." But I have not heard anyone talk about actually shooting the thing away from the range. Even after having my 6-round magazine replaced by Kahr, the slide on my gun will not chamber the first round after I have carried the gun around for a few weeks. The hollowpoint ammo seems to slide around in the mag, and then the follower loses control of the stack so the top two rounds will "jaw" open relative to each other causing severe rimlock. This will happen with either 5 or 6 rounds in the mag. I am hoping that some of you guys out there that have been shooting the Kahr PM9 only as a range gun actually shoot the defense rounds that you have been carrying in the clip for awhile to see if the gun even works! If it does, then you either haven't been shaking around a lot, or you do have a concealed carry gun that you can depend on. I know that I can't depend on mine.
 
...the Kahr PM9 ... is a range gun.

Huh? Don't know quite what you mean. I haven't heard anyone say it's finicky like a tight competition gun. :confused:

If you mean that you go to a range that doesn't let you shoot premium hollowpoints; that's too bad. :(

In any case, my PM9 has digested a wide variety of brands and bullets without failure.

A carry gun has to earn it's position. For me, the Kahr PM9 has done that very well.:cool: :)

Larry
 
That's what I keep hearing - hundreds of rounds and it still keeps ticking....
But I am assuming that those rounds are shot at the range, and not in a defensive situation. Therefore, the Kahr PM9 has been continuously represented in this forum as a range gun. I have not yet read a thread where someone had used this gun off the range, e.g. a defensive situation. The one time I had to answer a thump in the basement, the PM9 locked up hard (that was only the first time). I am waiting to hear if anyone has actually shot this gun after having the magazine jostled for a while. I know that when I am at the range, I push each round back in the magazine so that the cartridge rims are all aligned. I don't take the magazine and shake it all around. I can shoot all day with my PM9 if the mag is not shaken. But if it is, and it will be if you carry the gun around town, then I am afraid that you cannot stake your life on the gun.
 
...But I am assuming...
Yep, you are.

The pistol is used, trained with, and tested in the same situations as most other carry guns. Most folks are not as limited as you on the range they can use.

Return your particular pistol to the manufacturer for repair or replacement. Then you can join the happy crowd.:)

Larry
 
Kahr PM40

I am responding to the discusion about the reliability of the Kahr PM40. I wanted to add my experience here. I am a novice handgunner. I have practiced for about a year with a Taurus 9mm. When I thought about carrying,I knew the Taurus was out of the question for me. I looked at everything that was out there and decided on the just released PM40 with the night sights. That was about one year ago (April 2005).

The Kahr PM40 shot very well right out of the box. My first trip to the range I shot 50 rounds and no mis-haps. Then I started getting into problems with the Taurus misfeeding and jamming the slide. It got so bad that I couldn't get through one magazine without at least one jam. Then, like a virus, I started having the same symptoms with the Kahr.

This was the clue that helped me fix both guns. Remember I said I was a bit of a novice? Well, when I clean my guns I spend a fair amount of time on them to be sure they are spotless. Then I put a little oil on the slide and maybe some places I shouldn't, and put them away. I examined the barrels after some misfeeds and found powder, but not dry and granular. It was a little gooey - oil mixed with powder.

So I cleaned both of these guns and dried them thoroughly - including the magazines. I went with a small amount of oil on the slide rails and put them back together. They both worked perfectly, every time.

I felt like a real dummy for a while, but I am glad I figured it out. I have put over 1,000 rounds through the Kahr and carry it confidently. This model is not for everyone, but I believe it is well made and reliable.
 
I read a lot of threads that gave me pause.

I wanted a PM9 but didn't want the heartache. I held off for quite a while, but finally found a used one here on THR. The owner seemed to be a straight shooter, told me he had put about 150 rounds through it and it had gone back to Kahr for night sites. Came with an extra recoil spring assembly, but no trouble reported.

I have a lot of faith in THR'ers so I took the chance. It arrived, I took it to the range with about 150 rounds of FMJ reloads and about 150 rounds of JHPs--CorBon 115 JHP and 100gr PowRball, Golden Sabre 124+p, Federal 115 +p+. It digested and cycled everything flawlesly. Since then I have put probably another 150 rounds of various ammo, including Winchester Ranger 127 +p+.

It has taken the place of my prior CHL weapon, the S&W 340PD. It only weighs about 3 oz more, carries 6+1 instead of 5+0, I shoot the Kahr better and reloading is quicker. I have faith in it and my abilities with it. I am now looking to add Kahr P45...
 
I bought a NIB P9 a few months ago and had a lot of initial problems with it. Put about 500 rounds (WWB FMJ and 115gr Rem +P JHP) through it and experienced numerous FTF's. It frequently failed to fully chamber the round and close when releasing the slide and when firing. Sent it to Kahr and they polished up various surfaces and returned it about a month later. I've put about 250 rounds thru it since getting it back and it has run flawlessly.
 
I recently purchased a new PM9 using an excellent G36 in trade.. well worth it. I had one minor problem..
..emailed to Kahr on Sun pm 6/18..

First trip to the range I fired 300 rounds of Winchester and Remington 9mm 115gr FMJ ammo, intermittently the cocking cam failed to fully engage the striker sear and would slip past it. Pulling the trigger through and letting it snap back allowed it to fully engage. I had not fully cleaned the gun prior so I thought it was a combination of new weapon "roughness" and too much factory grease in the nether regions. On returning home I detail stripped the entire gun to investigate my potential problem.. while flushing the striker bore in the slide I noticed a good amount of what appeared to be metal shaving on the cloth I had to collect the solvent and dirt. I inspected the entire slide assy in and out with a magnifying glass and bore light but could find not obvious cause and assumed it was a sloppy cleanup at the factory finished cleaning and lubing the firearm and reassembled it.
Today I returned to the range and fired another 400 rounds and all went well until the last box of ammo when it repeated the previous malfunction 3 times in 50 rounds. I first believed it to be due to powder fouling because it was getting very dirty. On returning home I again detail stripped the firearm and in flushing the striker bore again found what appeared to be metal shavings that looked brassy and sparkly on the pad.I reinspected each part inside the slide with a magnifying glass again and found that in the open space where the striker spacer rides and makes contact there appears to be, for lack of certainty, what I tentatively identify as a chrome finish that is separating and blistering from the inside of the striker bore. It feels like a hard chrome and is about 75% missing from inside the striker bore. I removed the loose chips and one blister but would like to receive a replacement striker. The striker spacer has no evidence of same.



CS immediately offered me a new striker which I have already received, their service was exemplary. The weapon rides in my waistband daily and fires everytime.. I have no problem keeping 6 of 7 in 3" circle at 15" rapid fire.. to date it has just under 800 rounds through it. I have found the sights to be useless and get better performance using point/shoot techniques and will remove them and fill the dovetails. I also plan to dehorn the entire gun very soon.. Kahr uses a "tempering" process similar to case hardening for stainless on the slide so simple bead blasting after shaping is all I should need..

If any of you are experiencing the failures I did make sure to check your striker for signs of lifting or blistering. its a simple fix. Kahr's CS is quick and sharp.
 
Reliability Issues Resolved?

I know this thread is old but I find it every time I search for PM9 reliability on various search engines. I have some new, important information regarding a 2007 black model slide problem.

That is why I am adding this information on things I have experienced that resulted in poor reliability of the Kahr PM9. I hope others considering this gun, or who have it, can better evaluate its potential- primarily because there still is not anything quite like it in size for its price. My brother has two 9s and one 45 Rohrbaughs and has had more problems with them, before and after returning them all for service, than I have with the Kahr.

After buying a new black PM9 about May 2007 for personal protection, I was extremely disappointed by reliability problems.

There was a Speer FMJ target ammo the range sold which was somewhat pointed- that would never feed, ever. I used it in an SA XD9 which will cycle nails, rocks, . . .

But even with a variety of rounded FMJ target ammo, the Kahr PM9 every 2-3, sometimes every round, failure to feed, jam on the ramp.

Failure to go into battery common, often, sometimes every shot.

Can't shoot +1. If have round in chamber, regardless how you put it in there, and full mags (I have three 7 rnd and one 6 round mags), got a FF for first 2 to 3 rounds out of mag.

This was still happening after 200+ rounds . The more you shot the gun after cleaning it, the worse the first two problems became.

Sent it to Kahr. Kahr polished the feed ramp, change the recoil spring assembly and returned it with a note saying they shot several mags with no failures.

Immediately the gun would still not shoot +1. With a round in the chamber and a full mag, the first 2 to 3 bullets out of the mags, all 4 of the mags, would FF.

The FF were less frequent but it still would not ever shoot more than 2 mags without a FF. Sometimes the FF would be more often.

The failure to go into battery would reappear and get progressively worse after firing about 4 mags without cleaning.

I fired about 250 more rounds through the PM9 and these problems were rather consistent throughout that time, cleaning the gun after every 5th or 6th mag was fired.

June 2007 I scheduled $700+ of custom work for this at Cylinder and Slide. I received a call this morning, April 18, 2008 (I got a letter at the end of March 2008 to send in the gun, they were ready for it) from the gunsmith working on my PM9, John. He believes he found the cause of the FF problems. The slide is cut at the wrong angle, in fact, instead of so many degrees in one direction, for example such as clockwise from vertical, it was cut at that degree but counterclockwise from vertical. He said that would cause the FF problems. He had already called Kahr with this information and was told to send back the slide. They want to measure it themselves to verify what John found. It looks as if a batch of slides might have been machined incorrectly, or maybe the machining periodically goes out of tolerance to produce this problem. Kahr promised to provide a new slide. I of course have to pay shipping but hopefully this will solve the FF problems both during firing and in the +1 situation.

Maybe there is also a machining issue on that slide that is causing the failure to go into battery.

Mistakes can happen- I bought a new Springfield Armory XD-45 that had FF problems. Turns out there was a bad batch of (improper machining) locking blocks, and that gun had one. They put in a new locking block and the gun is flawless.

But it concerns me that Kahr, for as much at the PM 9 costs, their service department didn't take the time and or have the expertise to identify this problem when I sent it back the first time.

I will say, the accuracy of this PM9 as it was, out to 15 yards, was incredible. And with with a variety of the same type of hollow point bullets fired from the PM9 as was with the XD9, the PM9 has less felt recoil. It was easy to shoot accurately with one hand, right or left. At three yards, it was easy to consistently center mass targets firing from the hip close to the body.

I hope when I get back this now $1500 Kahr PM9, it will shoot reliably including with no failure to go into battery after only 4 mags are fired (that is only 27 rounds, about 1 1/2 mag out of the XD9 through which I have fired more than 500 rounds flawlessly without cleaning, as well as through the XD45).
 
Reliability Issues Resolved?

I don't think so. The Kahr poly line has been out since 2000 and people continue to report a significant number of issues with them to this day. I have a P9 and it's a wonderful little compact CCW gun. I bought it NIB in 2006 and it immediately had to go back to Kahr because it was a jam-o-matic. It's an absolute abomination that Kahr hasn't solved their QC problems after 8 years in a premium priced handgun.
-
 
I bought a PM9 a few years ago from a guy that said it was a "problem gun" -- he'd had it back to the factory and they had done a reliability job, then told him the gun worked perfectly for them before and afterward. He got it back and still had lots of jams. I had a hunch, and bought the gun from him for cheap, and sure enough -- it was him. I put about 2,000 rounds through that gun with no malfunctions. Zero. Everything from HPs to ball to FPs, everything I had or could find. They're not tolerant of limp-wristing, and require a solid grip. Otherwise, the ones I've shot have been great.

By the way, for those who like .45ACP AND the PM frame -- try the PM45. I bought one and it's my first-choice carry gun now. I have 450 rounds through it and it has yet to malfunction in any way, and I can purposely limp-wrist it and it still functions perfectly. Downside is that it won't quite fit the PM9/PM40 holsters, so I had a buddy make some kydex versions for me. Shoots like a big .45 but carries like Barbie's Dream Gun! :D

Specialized
 
Size PM9 vs PM45

Yes, the PM45 is tiny, relatively speaking. For me however it was just too big to conceal easily in a fine dress slacks or suit pants pocket with no other concealment. I wanted the PM 9 for that specific situation where I would have to remove my jacket. Otherwise, I carry the full sized 13+1 xd-45 Tactical in a canted belt or paddle holster from Comp-Tac, and a couple of spare mags on the other side, under a suit or sport jacket when I don't have to remove the jacket for some reason and am not wearing a sweater. With a sweater I can appendix CC the full sized XD45 Service. There are however weather, homes and offices I know I will go into here in the southwest US where I have to spend hours and the temperatures are too hot to be comfortable with a sweater or jacket for very long.

The PM9 disappears in a front pants pocket but the PM45 won't.

Now if I could wear cargo pants instead of suit slacks. . . !
 
I have one of the "had to go back but came back OK" PM9s. There is really nothing else on the market that combines the small size, light weight, full-power cartridge, trigger pull, sights and overall shootability (for a little gun).

I would get a PM9 in preference to a .40. The .40 is likely to be quite a handful in such a little gun, with nasty bite as well as bark, as well has having one less shot.
 
Last edited:
reliable

would you consider 10,550 rounds out of a pm9 without one malfucntion--reliable????

best damn gun I ever owned and shot...
 
My PM9 is also reliable and accurate -- it has been going strong for at least 2,000 rounds with no failures. Would not hesitate to get another one.

I discovered limp-wristing on lightweight polymer pistols when Glocks were first introduced. After I fixed myself, I discovered that the pistols were fixed too.
 
swps
Why are you responsible for shipping?

I've actually been wondering about shipping under Kahr's warranty - do they generally cover it?
 
Just thought I'd share

Bought a new kahr PM9 (black slide) last week everything has been great with the gun except 1 thing. The mags. will not drop free.

Called kahr twice on friday and was told by two different techs. they have someone new making the frames and there not supposed to drop free anymore. Was told they were having trouble with the followers breaking and they don't want the magazines to drop free. Well after looking at my dad's pm9 (his is around 4 years old but only has around 400 rounds thru it) I noticed the rails inside his mag well didn't stick out near as much as mine and none of his magazines had marks from the rails rubbing. I used a file and lightly filed the rails inside the mag well where it was leaving marks on my mags. just alittle at a time untill they dropped free. I also polished the mag. release where it contacts the magazine but I don't think that made any difference. Also my dad has around 6 extra magazines, the followers that have the silver metal piece on the follower (I think the older follower) had no trouble dropping free before I did anything in my kahr pm9. The newer designed follower has a brass color metal piece and to me they don't look like they stick out as far, they didn't drop free from my kahr but would drop free from his pm9 and my cw9 of course they're the ones that came with my new pm9 and my cw9 I bought last year.

Anyway you would think if they're having trouble with the followers breaking they would fix them not make it so the mags. don't drop free . I hope they were feeding me a line and my frame wasn't quite right. and that they really haven't changed there frames to make them not drop free. I will not carry a gun that the mags. don't drop free period. We'll see what a couple hundred more rounds will bring if all is well I'll be a happy man.
 
Pm 45

How do you like your PM45???

What is the recoil or kick like???

I try a Glock 30 in 45 and I thought it was going to fly out of my hands.
 
PM9

My vote would be to go with the 9. If I wanted an experimental heavy weight I would pick up a PM.45. They are in the stores now; somewhat larger though.

I like my 9 and the recoil is easily manageable and provides for rapid follow-up shots. You can run Plus P also in the Kahr. I have heard the .40 is a handful, but that is here say.
 
Seems to be Kahr week. I just posted this over in the TFL:

I have avoided the PM-9 for a long time. I felt that it built to close to the "edge" has I call it. Full power round, tiny pistol. That ended when I got a realy good deal this winter. I finaly took it out to the range today. It was used, but I did a 200 round break in just in case. No issues, no failures(fired it w/o lube to). I have XS big dots sights on it and shot both the flush mag and the +1. It's a ok pistol for me. The grip is to short for my taste leaving only 2 fingers holding on. With the +1 mag you get all three fingers on it, but the butt is still not supported has well as I would like. The result is a differant feel then from the "full sized" P-9, it doesn't point has well. Would be nice if Kahr gets out a wrap around mag extension like the Walther PPS.

Bottom line. The PM-9 is harder to shoot well then the P-9, is not much easier to conceal then the P-9, while being harder to draw due to the reduced size of the frame. The up side is I can use the PM in a pocket holster (something that doesn't normaly fit my body type) which suprised me. Will I keep it yes. Is it my top pick no, the P-9 remains my go to pistol.

The PM-40 would be just to much for me. Maybe a MK-40?
 
Must be something in the water.

I just bought a PM-9 as well. 50 trouble free rounds fired in the first outing and dryfired it about 150 times while watching tv. Now to find magazines.

Tim
 
I have a PM9 (stainless slide) and have not had a single FTF/FTF in about 450-500 rounds. I sent it to Kahr to have night sights installed (free labor!!) and they polished my feed ramp to a mirror shine for free (I sent my barrel in for inspection)

love my PM9

fred
 
hate to say it

my PM9 has 12,650 flawless rounds through it. I think I just shoot it to much but it is such a pleasrure to shoot and more accurate than I am. Love the trigger system. Glocks do't lite a candle to the kahr system. Read where kahr actually has 7 patents on their handguns.

These kahrs today and just extremely reliable right out of the box. Most issue you read about are guns 2 plus years and older, I think kahr is way beyond that now. Can't wait tilltheier little p380 hits the market. I expec t it to be every bit as reliable and quality built abnd the PM9 are. After all it is a scaled down model of the pm9.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top