J.T. Gerrity
Member
These questions are always a pissin' match because they're subject to opinions, and everybody has their own. Both of these pistols are excellent, hard-hitting weapons that have their own pluses and minuses, and one doesn't necessarily shine over the other. On the Colt, you'll have more cap jams, and on the Remington, the cyl pin needs constant attention or it will jam up after as few as five rounds (from personal experience). Arbor vs top strap is merely a matter of perception as the Colt arbor system is every bit as strong as the top strap, it just isn't as visible and so seems a little like magic to some folks. I think, after 175 years of testing, that it's proven itself to be reliable.
Changing out cylinders is faster on the Rem, but by only about five or ten seconds. The hammer notches on the Rem are a better safety system than the pins on the Colt (but that has no bearing on how the pistol shoots), and the sighting system on the Rem is possibly better than the hammer nose "sight" on the Colt (but not by much).
I could go on, but why? I had a NMA and an 1860 Colt, and after shooting both, I gave the NMA to a friend for his birthday. I just liked the Colt better; I thought it "looked" a little less modern than the Rem with its top strap, and I liked the way it fit my hand. And that is the the point I'm trying to make: just get what you like. Neither gun is superior over the other, they both have their little quirks that you'll have to deal with, so just go by your gut and sense of history; try them both, if you can, and get the one that tickles your fancy. Besides, if you're like a lot of folks on this site, you'll end up owning both, anyway!
JMHO
Changing out cylinders is faster on the Rem, but by only about five or ten seconds. The hammer notches on the Rem are a better safety system than the pins on the Colt (but that has no bearing on how the pistol shoots), and the sighting system on the Rem is possibly better than the hammer nose "sight" on the Colt (but not by much).
I could go on, but why? I had a NMA and an 1860 Colt, and after shooting both, I gave the NMA to a friend for his birthday. I just liked the Colt better; I thought it "looked" a little less modern than the Rem with its top strap, and I liked the way it fit my hand. And that is the the point I'm trying to make: just get what you like. Neither gun is superior over the other, they both have their little quirks that you'll have to deal with, so just go by your gut and sense of history; try them both, if you can, and get the one that tickles your fancy. Besides, if you're like a lot of folks on this site, you'll end up owning both, anyway!
JMHO
Last edited: