Rhetorical Question, I suppose

Status
Not open for further replies.

ilcylic

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2004
Messages
1,002
Location
Desert Southwest, USA
Republican House.

Republican Senate.

Republican President.

Why aren't they FIXING anything?

(1986, 1968, and 1934 all come to mind just off the top of my head...)
 
Because their hold on power is relatively weak, and they would rather take 15 years to accomplish somethign sneakily than do it openly and risk a voter rebellion when someone takes away their entitlements.

Legalizing controversial classes of guns isnt something that they feel will win them elections right now. As long as their opposition continues to run on gun grabbing they dont have to be very pro to get our vote. We need to focus on primaries more to ensure that really pro-gun people make it to the elections.
 
Also because "they" are not monolithic, and a lot of "them" are hostile to the solutions you propose, with a much larger number simply not caring at all whether certain classes of guns are legal or illegal.
 
The Unfortunate Truth

Is that the only difference between R and D is the methodology used to screw us. The R's use lube, the D's don't.
 
I think Nightwatch's work answers the question quite nicely.
syst10.jpg
 
Republicrats.

Modern political parties might as well be sports teams. Whether it's the Spurs or the Pistons, both are playing the same game. Sometimes one wins, sometimes the other wins. As long as the people and the pundits are entertained, it's all good. Ya got yer money's worth.

If they think an issue is less than sure to get more points for either themselves as individuals or for their respective teams, they ain't gonna touch it.

They do not see problems that need to be addressed or liberties to be protected. They see opportunities to garner votes.
 
Because they have no principles (except re-election), they have no spine and they don't represent the people who elected them. They believe in their arrogance that their opponents (the Democrats) are so far out of the mainstream that their constituents have nowhere else to go. They have a pandering liberal leader in the person of George W. Bush showing them the way to bigger more intrusive government and a country without borders.

I will never never vote Republican again. :fire:
 
Ok, I guess I was a little over focussed on machine guns, in the laws I cited. But there are lots of other things that would be really nice to get rid of, that don't offer anyone any new capabilities, (such as free ownership of fully automatic weapons) but would go a long way towards reducing the headache I get every time I think about playing around with a configuration. 922 would be a good one to get rid of. The Chinese and Russian import bans. Heck, every AW import ban.

*shrug*

I run to libertarian tendencies anyway, so I'm not actually all that surprised that the Republicans aren't doing squat for us 2A people, I'm just trying to verify independantly that they are not our friends either.
 
I think the biggest problem stems from the fact that we have too many branches of government "working for the people."

Look at how everyone talks, this is for the people, that is for the people. Even our representitives do not understand the system. Quite frankly, the 17th ammendment has thrown the whole system out of balance. Now people write and call their senators. The senators are supposed to represent the states best interest, not the people. That is why each state has equal representation.

The peoples branch of government was supposed to be the house. That is your voice.

In the past (prior to the 17th), the peoples voice, "the majority," could not overrule the constitution, because the states were represented. Now, we truly live in a majority rules society. Democracy is quite frankly one of the most distirbing forms of government that mankind places upon themselves. Democracy destroys the individual and places importance upon groups of people. Unfortunatly, the war against the individual is succeeding, and the constitution is no longer a factor. It is not a rule of law, but a "living breathing document, " as the destructors like to say. The most recent example of this was when GW signed McCain-Feingold stating that he knew it was unconstitutional.

Unfortunatly, most of us are confused as to where we stand. History shows it takes approximately 200 years for a free society to destroy itself. The question is not whether or not we are destroying our free society, but what stage of the destruction we are in. Are we at a point where electing libertarian minded individuals could turn this around, or are we now at the stage where we are bound by the state.

In conclusion, I believe Marx stated that the first step to destroying a free society was allowing the government to educate. We are now seeing several generations of government educated individuals running the country. They were not properly taught the system, so how can they run the system.
 
I run to libertarian tendencies anyway, so I'm not actually all that surprised that the Republicans aren't doing squat for us 2A people, I'm just trying to verify independantly that they are not our friends either.

The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Voting GOP is probably the most expedient way to hold the Demosocialists at bay. I did that and expect to continue.
 
I'm not convinced that the GOP actually holds the demosocialists at bay; they constantly capitulate and roll over in the interests of 'comity'. As a result, we continue down the path into totalitarianism. Remember also that is it the GOP who spearheaded the Patriot Act and are pushing for its renewal.

It is the GOP who have grown government to epic proportions, adding government agencies and spending like drunken sailors.

No, the GOP no longer represents me.
 
The more things you control, the more things will appear to further tempt you. This goes on until the system collapses under its own weight. Then you get chaos, then peaceful freedom and the system begins to build itself up again.

A healthy system would tear itself down voluntarily to prevent it from becoming too much of a burden to itself. But these systems are governed by men. It doesnt take a lot of bad people to make tyranny.
 
STATIST House

STATIST Senate

STATIST President

STATIST Supreme Court


...


They *are* fixing things.
 
Who is under the delusion that the GOP is any more in our camp (at heart) than any other?

The republicans are guarding the door and we're still losing liberties.

Just because they haven't initiated new gun control legislation, you think they're "friendly." :banghead:

Today's republican party is just as anxious to put their mighty thumb on the American people as the Democrats ever were. It's very sad, but it's true.
 
Who is under the delusion that the GOP is any more in our camp (at heart) than any other?

I certainly am. We have plenty of allies in the GOP. There are no Democrat Senators with decent records, but there are 10 or so House Democrats with excellent records and high ratings.

Are our issues high on their list right now? Absolutely not.
 
The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Voting GOP is probably the most expedient way to hold the Demosocialists at bay. I did that and expect to continue.

A good observation, in my view.

Also, I remain unconvinced that any of the alternative parties would serve us any better should they ever gain real power in the government. They would encounter the same pitfalls the GOP and Dems have.
 
George Bush is a big government, big spending LIBERAL. He's proponent of open borders and globalism. He makes JFK look conservative.
 
One thing Bush has taught me, don't pay any attention to what he says - just watch what he signs. And he'll sign anything.
 
The enemy of my enemy is my friend
THERE YOU ARE. If you think for one second the liberal tranzi gun stealing Demogogs are like the Repubs you are deluded. You are out of your mind.

The Repubs look a lot like the Demos because they are POLITICIANS. I am a libertarian, but the Libertarian Party looks (and acts) like kooks. I am not real happy with my representatives (who are all R's now that I have moved out of St. Louis Kounty), but the R's are the only ones who are viable.

Keep in mind, if you are an R you have to not only run for reelection against a D, you also have to run against the Socialist Mainstream Media. If you are the greatest person in the Congress or State Assembly or whatever, you won't get a letter or word of press from the SMSM. If you have one hangnail they will be all over you quicker than a fly on ....

If you are guilty of negligent homicide, rape, or being a Klansman you get a pass, but only if there is a big fat D behind your name.
 
Here's your answer:

http://www.washtimes.com/national/20050614-114627-2954r.htm

President Bush last night ripped the Democratic Party as do-nothing obstructionists bent on derailing his reform agenda, saying that on issue after issue, Democratic leaders in Congress 'stand for nothing except obstruction, and this is not leadership.'
At an evening congressional gala at the Washington Convention Center -- which drew $23 million for House and Senate Republican candidates and amounted to the kickoff of the 2006 political campaign season -- the president drew standing ovations from Republican faithful as he hammered Democrats for offering no solutions to the nation's most pressing problems.
'If leaders of the other party have innovative ideas, let's hear them. But if they have no ideas or policies except obstruction, they should step aside and let others lead,' Mr. Bush said to thunderous applause from more than 5,000 supporters.
The president, who has spent the past several months seeking consensus on his Social Security reform package and reaching out to Democrats with nonconfrontational rhetoric, said opposition party leaders are pursuing 'the philosophy of the stop sign, the agenda of the roadblock, and our country and our children deserve better.'
'Political parties that choose the path of obstruction will not gain the trust of the American people,' he said at the event dubbed 'the 2005 President's Dinner.'
Mr. Bush said political parties can take one of two approaches: 'One approach is to lead, to focus on the people's business, to take on the tough problems, and that is exactly what our party is doing.
'The other approach is to simply do nothing, to delay solutions, obstruct progress, refuse to take responsibility. Members of the other party have worked with us to achieve important reforms on some issues, yet too often, their leadership prefers to block the ideas of others.'
Democrats have filibustered John R. Bolton, Mr. Bush's nominee to become ambassador to the United Nations; blocked his judicial nominees, some for as long as four years; and demanded that he withdraw his idea to create personal Social Security retirement accounts before they will offer their own plan or negotiate in earnest over Republican proposals.
Congressional leaders such as House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi of California and Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada have also blocked the president's energy bill, his medical-liability reform legislation and his plan to extend his tax-relief plan beyond its 2010 expiration date.
'We hear 'no' to making tax relief permanent, we hear 'no' to Social Security reform, we hear 'no' to confirming federal judges, we hear 'no' to a highly qualified U.N. ambassador, we hear 'no' to medical-liability reform. On issue after issue, they stand for nothing except obstruction, and this is not leadership,' he said to resounding applause.
On Congress' first full day back to work after their Memorial Day recess, Mr. Bush said he is proud to 'be the head of a party that has a positive and hopeful and optimistic vision for every single person that lives in this country.'
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist of Tennessee and House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert of Illinois also spoke at the gala, taking aim at Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean, who has spent the past few months deriding Republicans in Congress.
'I was hoping that Governor Dean could make it tonight,' Mr. Frist said of the former Vermont governor. 'But sadly, he's too busy to make it. He's too busy helping us expand the Republican majority.'
The senator, a doctor like the DNC chairman, invoked a James Bond villain in saying that obstructionist tactics have forced the Democrats to 'change Dr. Dean's nameplate over at the DNC to 'Dr. No.'?'
Mr. Hastert also lashed out at the agenda of 'the other side of the aisle.'
'It is not enough to be against everything: What are their ideas' While Republicans are working to meet the needs of the American people, the Democrats are in meetings to figure out what the heck to do with Howard Dean.'
To laughter and applause, Mr. Hastert delivered the punch line: 'And between you and I, they might have the tougher challenge.'
ha ha clap clap

Oh, that Bush feller ripped the Dems. Tore 'em up. It's the other guys' fault. As to the specific question as to why no politicians are seeking to repeal infringements on our liberty, it's because they are tripping over each other to point fingers at each other. The agenda for the Repugnantcan party appears to be:
*Democrats are weasels
*Reform wealth redistribution
*Democrats are laughingstocks
*Reform how we control energy resources
*Democrats are whiners
*Reform legislative control of the courts
*Democrat permission is required for all we do
*We wouldn't let Clinton stack the courts and now they won't let us boo hoo
*Democrats won't let us Save America
:barf: :barf: :barf:
Read about the two major political parties' concerns. See how much it has to do with protecting our liberty and the Constitution or perverting it. Read about our founding fathers and their concerns and figure out how it applies to modern life and law. Vote accordingly.
 
Standard bully pulpit fare. I thought it was a good article, more quotes than any real spin. I didn't read anything I regarded as untrue or even misleading.

The President would like to have his way, but I think his statements about his opposition were factual. The reason I would take it all seriously is that the opposition is absolutely predictable. There is no way that everything the GOP proposes is wrong and should be opposed. Some of it is certainly debatable to say the least.

If the Democrats want to be taken seriously, they better pick their battles. What makes it look bad is that many GOP proposals are a direct frontal assault on everything the Democrats stand for.
 
feh. It's just posturing. GWB should be preaching to his own party in the House and Senate who have the means, but not the will, to enact his legislative desires. Instead, congressional Republicans are more interested in 'comity' and being like by their 'colleagues'. Bunch of spineless do-nothing country club wimps.

I'm done voting for Republicans.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top