Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Rifle Scopes: 1" or 30mm Tube?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Brasso, Mar 7, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Brasso

    Brasso Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2003
    Messages:
    419
    Location:
    Alabama
    Most American scopes seem to have 1" tubes and the Euro scopes seem to have 30mm tubes. Is there an advantage to either one?

    Also, I was thinking about getting a Nikon Monarch Gold 1.5x6x42 scope for my newly aquired Rem 700 in 8mm Mauser. Anyone have experience with this scope or the Gold line? Most of the prices I've seen for these scopes run about $500, is this OK or is there a really cheap source out there?

    Thanks.
     
  2. P95Carry

    P95Carry Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    16,341
    Location:
    South PA, and a bit West of center!
    I have no Nikon scopes but - Nikon has an awesome reputation for quality optics.

    1" vs 30mm? Doesn't matter IMO re function .. as long as optics are good enough... main thing perhaps is there is a greater choice of 1" rings.
     
  3. patentnonsense

    patentnonsense Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2004
    Messages:
    534
    Location:
    Dallas
    yes, i believe it does matter somewhat - easier to have a bright image and wide field with a less restrictive tube. (I'm not an optical engineer, but have worked with a few.)
     
  4. clubsoda22

    clubsoda22 member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2003
    Messages:
    1,718
    Location:
    SE PA
    if you're looking for a good but inexpensive scope, try sightron. It's leupold quality for half the price. Really nice optics if you're on a budget.
     
  5. P95Carry

    P95Carry Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    16,341
    Location:
    South PA, and a bit West of center!
    I don't think the extra 4.6mm tube dia matters much . the objective lens is what gets the light gathering done. The tube really is just ''transmission''.

    Club ........ ''sightron'' ..... any good sources? This is not one I am familiar with ... and I have Leupolds etc, as well as Simmons cheapies too!
     
  6. 45crittergitter

    45crittergitter Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2003
    Messages:
    2,590
    Location:
    Mississippi
    The 30mm tube will not bend as easily as the 1" (though it may dent just as easily). Probably an academic point.

    Most 30mm scopes use the same optics as the 1" models, so usually it is not an advantage there.

    30mm tubes allow more room for movement of the internal optics, so you may have more range of adjustment....
     
  7. E=MC^2

    E=MC^2 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2003
    Messages:
    178
    Location:
    Up North
    Evidence of this can be seen in the design of bicycle frames. Notice the diameter of the oversized tubing used on high-end aluminum manufacturers. The larger diameter is reported to increase rigidity. Same with aluminum arrow manufacturers. When the wall thickness is the same(designated by the last 2 digits in the size), the largest diameter will always have a heavier spine than the smaller diameter arrow. The first 2 digits of the size denotes diameter. For instance, "2117".
    This is more true of american-based manufacturers. They use the same reticle tube diameter in the 1" and 30mm designs. Here the gain is added elevation & windage adjustment. Most European manufactureres use a larger diameter reticle-tube. While the elevation & windage adjustment is decreased, the area of light that's transmitted is increased.

    To see the difference, just look down the end of a small pipe into the distance. Then do the same with a pipe of larger diameter. The larger diameter pipe is allowing a greater amount of light and image to be gathered by the eye. This would simulate the larger diameter internal reticle tube used on European optics. While for many years people have claimed there is no difference between the 1" & 30mm in lowlight, it's only when the same diameter reticle tube is used in both. When you increase the diameter of the internal reticle tube, the transmission is also increased.

    Side by side, the difference between my Leupold MK4 and Swarovskis are very noticable. And both have 30mm maintubes. When I shine a light inside the objective-end of each I can see the difference in tube size is much different. While the MK4 has alot of space surrounding it for adjustment, the Swarovski's is much larger.

    Basically, there are 2 types of 30mm scopes. Those designed for 'optimum' adjustment, and those designed for 'optimum' transmission. Though it's very rare that this is mentioned. Most only refer to the american style and say there is no difference between the transmission of the 1" & 30mm.
     
  8. Brasso

    Brasso Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2003
    Messages:
    419
    Location:
    Alabama
    So the question is which type of internal tube does Nikon use?

    Btw, does anyone have any direct experience with Nikon vs Burris? I've just about decided on a 1.5x6x42 scope and am trying to decide between the Burris Signature Select or the Nikon Monarch Gold.

    If optics are about the same, which one might be the more durable?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page