Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Rock River Arms Car-A4

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by imprezagm4, Jul 20, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. imprezagm4

    imprezagm4 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2006
    Messages:
    266
    Location:
    Bend, OR
    I'm seriously considering a RRA Car-A4 to be my "go-to" rifle. I want it to handle everything from casual target shooting, social purposes, and varmint (coyote and ground squirrel mostly). I know RRA makes a coyote ar, but I want an all around gun.

    Does the car-a4 fit the bill? Anyone have experience with one? I'm somewhat concerned that it wont have the long range accuracy I need.

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Jul 20, 2007
  2. DMK

    DMK Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,766
    Location:
    Over the hills and far, far away
    For a 16" AR, I'd go with one of RRA's Midlength guns. I don't see the point to buying the AR with the shorter sight radius and more violent gas system.

    If you want to shoot out to 200-300 yards, get a 20". It will add about 100fps and flatten the ballistic curve a bit.
     
  3. rdaines

    rdaines Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2007
    Messages:
    191
    Location:
    St. Charles County, Missouri/ Pinal County, AZ
    I have two 16 inchers and they are great and accurate. Should be able to dispatch a coyote at 300 yards with the right loads and sighting in with a scope. Sight radius would apply if you didn't put a scope or dot on it. I recommend you do.
     
  4. benEzra

    benEzra Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    8,536
    Location:
    Down East in NC
    That page says that RRA guarantees 1 MOA with match ammo, i.e. 1" groups at 100 yards. That's excellent accuracy.

    I would second the recommendation to go with a midlength handguard/gas system and a 16" barrel, like this:

    [​IMG]

    Or this:

    [​IMG]

    The one on the bottom is my personal favorite. All are guaranteed to shoot 1 MOA with match ammo.
     
  5. Ash

    Ash Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    5,358
    Location:
    Anywhere but here
    From what I understand, the mid length still uses the short gas system and so the only advantage is the longer sight radius.

    Ash
     
  6. rdaines

    rdaines Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2007
    Messages:
    191
    Location:
    St. Charles County, Missouri/ Pinal County, AZ
    This is the one I'd pick,
    [​IMG]

    The 16 inch. Forget those silly sights, you can add pop-ups later if you want. Just put a good scope or dot on it. You can add the collapsible stock too but must sold today are crappy, there are better after market ones.
     
  7. ZeroCool

    ZeroCool Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2006
    Messages:
    148
    My RRA Midlength (which I got right after the ban) has the proper "midlength" gas system.

    Unless they changed things (which I doubt they did, considering that the gas tube should connect the the front site base), RRA's middy's should still have the arguably less violent, more reliable midlength gas system.

    I really like my middy, and have it set up as a KISS rifle. They do however look really good as a RECCE setup.

    As soon as the funds allow, I am going to get an M4 Tacti-cool rifle as well.
     
  8. fastbike

    fastbike Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2007
    Messages:
    102
    Location:
    North Texas
    I have a 20" Predator Pursuit. Outstanding rifle. A bit lighter than an equivalent Varmint. The trigger is easily the best standard AR trigger I have experienced. Overall construction and fit is excellent.

    I would recommend any RRA.
     
  9. txgolfer45

    txgolfer45 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    679
    Location:
    Texas
    I thought about getting the RR. Also considered a Stag Arms, Bushmaster and S&W. Went with the S&W M&P15A. Quite similar to the RR you are considering.
     
  10. RockyMtnTactical

    RockyMtnTactical Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,539
    You should consider a Stag-15.
     
  11. Eightball

    Eightball Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2005
    Messages:
    4,257
    Location:
    Louisville, KY
    Well...no offense, but your understanding (at least so far as RRA is concerned) is wrong. My Middy that I bought yesterday says otherwise (the Mid-Length M4 pictured above). On most companies' dissipator models, however, your understandings seem to ususally be correct.
     
  12. DMK

    DMK Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,766
    Location:
    Over the hills and far, far away
    You're thinking of the Dissipator (and some Dissys use midlength or rifle gas systems, verify what you are buying).

    Midlengths all use a gas port about halfway between a CAR/M4 and rifle gas system (right under the sight block in the pics above).
     
  13. Bazooka Joe71

    Bazooka Joe71 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    2,803
    Location:
    Southern Indiana
    With the right optic and the right loads, you will have plenty of accuracy with the 16".

    Well I guess I should ask, how far out are we talking about shooting?
     
  14. KC&97TA

    KC&97TA Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    792
    DO NOT GET A STAG! Everyone I've seen has been horrible, in every respect.

    I do notice a difference between a M16A4 20" and the M16M4 16", but it's pretty minimal, I think alot has to do with the cheak weld and sight radius, with the RCO's minimal 4x32 power, most of that is difference is made up for. If I remember right muzzle velocity on the 20" is 3110 f/s and on the 16" is 2970 f/s. For the record, the M4 barrel is a bit less than 16", I think it might be 16" from the back of the chamber to the flass suppressor, the RRA is about 1.5" longer when the uppers are laid next to each other.

    My Personal Rifle and Wifes ;)

    I have a RRA Entry Tactical as I just stated in another thread, 16" barrel, 6pos stock. With M885 SS109, other wise known as 'green tip', I've scored shots @ 750m with an ACOG, 10 back to back shots on a 12" steel target, she had 10 little holes blasted through her.

    My wifes RRA NM, will hold SUB MOA @1000m, 5 shots on a 19" silhouette target with a 12" center circle, shots measured 7-3/4" at the farthest, from sand bags on iron sights, 77gr Blackhills, molly coated hollow points, mid morning dessert shooting.

    I think 90% of rifles will out shoot the guy squeezing the trigger. RRA makes a great rifle. I think they're just as good as Colt.

    Remember the US Marines shoot rack grade M16's at 500 yrds on iron sights scoreing on a 19" wide target, only useing a web sling for support from the prone. You're talking about useing a scope and have the ability to use support.
     
  15. no_problem

    no_problem Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2006
    Messages:
    342
    Go with the A2 for the full stock

    I'd go with the A2 with the full stock. IMHO, it gives you a better sight picture and cheek weld for long range shots.
     
  16. Eightball

    Eightball Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2005
    Messages:
    4,257
    Location:
    Louisville, KY
    Please, explain. I'm quite interested. Other than the fact that they don't have the configuration I wanted, and of the only two decent-sized AR dealers in my area one was way overpriced and the other didn't have any STAGs that fit my bill, all the Stag's I've seen were quite well manufactured, with quality fit & finish, albeit not what I was looking for, and being too expensive to boot. Maybe the units you looked at were the lemons of the batch, or was there something about them that I just missed when looking over them?

    That being said, I like my RRA. Quite a bit. Though, I much prefer Middys for most of the reasons DMK has suggested, I also hold a bit long with my supporting arm (habit that has carried over from things like my Garand and other full-length wood-stocked rifles), so a CAR wouldn't work well for me; to each their own. However, RRA seems to make quite the quality product for the money.
     
  17. RockyMtnTactical

    RockyMtnTactical Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,539
    Stag has a much better track record than most AR manufacturers. It's a better value than RRA or Bushmaster. I've literally built dozens of rifles and Stag is by far the best bang for the buck out there. Great quality, very good guys to deal with too.
     
  18. imprezagm4

    imprezagm4 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2006
    Messages:
    266
    Location:
    Bend, OR
    Thanks for the help!
     
  19. JonB

    JonB Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2006
    Messages:
    966
    Location:
    Tampa
    ANother +1 on a RRA midlength. I have the Elite CAR A4 and love it. I'm not a 'go through 1000 rounds in a weekend' kind of guy, but really enjoy this rifle. I didn't like the looks of the M4 style short handguards, but wanted a 16 inch barrel so the RRA middy was the winner. I ruled out Stag as they didn't have a midlength version.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page